Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(store/v2): add version exists #22235

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024
Merged

feat(store/v2): add version exists #22235

merged 8 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

tac0turtle
Copy link
Member

@tac0turtle tac0turtle commented Oct 11, 2024

Description

ref: #22243

this pr adds version exists in order to make stateat work for the state machine.


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • New method StateAt added to check for the existence of a requested version in the state storage.
  • Improvements

    • Updated return types for state storage methods to enhance functionality and consistency.
    • Enhanced query logic with a fallback mechanism for migration scenarios.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Minor adjustments made to comments and formatting for clarity.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2 C:server/v2 appmanager labels Oct 11, 2024
@cool-develope cool-develope changed the title store/v2: add version exists feat(store/v2): add version exists Oct 15, 2024
@cool-develope cool-develope marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2024 22:30
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant changes to the store package, primarily focusing on the transition from using VersionedDatabase to VersionedWriter. This includes updates to method signatures, the addition of a new method, and modifications to existing interfaces and structs. The changes aim to enhance the functionality related to state storage management, specifically with respect to version control and retrieval capabilities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
store/v2/root/store.go Changed stateStorage field type to VersionedWriter, updated constructor and method signatures, added StateAt.
store/v2/root/store_test.go Updated newStoreWithBackendMount parameter from VersionedDatabase to VersionedWriter.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

C:server/v2, C:Confix

Suggested reviewers

  • kocubinski
  • sontrinh16
  • hieuvubk
  • facundomedica
  • akhilkumarpilli

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@cool-develope your pull request is missing a changelog!

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
store/v2/mock/types.go (1)

15-15: Consider adding documentation for the StateStorage interface

The change from store.VersionedDatabase to store.VersionedWriter aligns with the PR objectives and reflects a shift in the expected functionality. This modification narrows the interface from a full database to just a writer, which could impact how the mock is used in tests.

While the code adheres to the Uber Golang style guide, it would be beneficial to add a comment explaining the purpose of the StateStorage interface and the rationale behind using VersionedWriter instead of VersionedDatabase. This would improve code clarity and maintainability.

Consider adding a comment above the StateStorage interface to explain its purpose and the reason for using VersionedWriter. For example:

// StateStorage is a mock interface that represents a versioned storage writer.
// It uses VersionedWriter to focus on write operations in the context of versioning.
store/v2/storage/database.go (1)

19-19: New method addition looks good, but consider documentation.

The new VersionExists method is a valuable addition to the Database interface, allowing for version existence checks. The method signature follows Go naming conventions and aligns well with the existing interface design.

However, to improve clarity and maintainability:

  1. Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose and behavior of this method, following the style of other methods in the interface.
  2. Ensure that all implementations of the Database interface are updated to include this new method.

You might want to add a comment like this above the method:

// VersionExists checks if a specific version exists in the database.
// It returns true if the version exists, false otherwise, and any error encountered.
VersionExists(version uint64) (bool, error)
store/v2/storage/rocksdb/db_noflag.go (1)

39-41: LGTM with a minor suggestion for consistency.

The new VersionExists method is correctly implemented and follows the same pattern as other methods in this file. It appropriately panics when RocksDB is not enabled.

For consistency with other methods in the file, consider adding a blank line after the method definition.

Here's a suggested minor change:

 func (db *Database) VersionExists(version uint64) (bool, error) {
 	panic("rocksdb requires a build flag")
 }
+
store/v2/storage/storage_bench_test.go (1)

27-43: LGTM! Consider grouping similar backend initializations.

The change from store.VersionedDatabase to store.VersionedWriter is consistent across all backend types and aligns with the PR objectives. This modification likely reflects a design change in the store package, moving to a more general VersionedWriter interface.

To improve code organization and readability, consider extracting the common storage.NewStorageStore(db, coretesting.NewNopLogger()) call into a separate function. This would reduce duplication and make it easier to modify in the future if needed.

Here's a suggested refactoring:

func newStorageStore(db store.VersionedDatabase) store.VersionedWriter {
	return storage.NewStorageStore(db, coretesting.NewNopLogger())
}

backends = map[string]func(dataDir string) (store.VersionedWriter, error){
	"rocksdb_versiondb_opts": func(dataDir string) (store.VersionedWriter, error) {
		db, err := rocksdb.New(dataDir)
		return newStorageStore(db), err
	},
	// ... other backends
}
store/v2/storage/store.go (1)

87-90: New method VersionExists looks good

The new VersionExists method is a valuable addition to the StorageStore struct. It correctly delegates the version existence check to the underlying database.

Consider adding a brief comment to explain the purpose of this method:

// VersionExists checks if the given version exists in the underlying database.
// It returns true if the version exists, false otherwise, and any error encountered during the check.
func (ss *StorageStore) VersionExists(version uint64) (bool, error) {
	return ss.db.VersionExists(version)
}

This comment would provide clarity on the method's functionality and return values.

store/v2/storage/rocksdb/db.go (1)

134-141: LGTM with a minor suggestion for improved clarity.

The VersionExists method is well-implemented and follows the Uber Go Style Guide. It correctly checks if the given version is within the valid range.

For improved clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the logic:

func (db *Database) VersionExists(version uint64) (bool, error) {
	latestVersion, err := db.GetLatestVersion()
	if err != nil {
		return false, err
	}

	// A version exists if it's between the earliest supported version (tsLow)
	// and the latest version, inclusive.
	return latestVersion >= version && version >= db.tsLow, nil
}

This comment helps future maintainers understand the version existence criteria at a glance.

store/v2/storage/sqlite/db.go (1)

130-137: LGTM: New VersionExists method

The new VersionExists method correctly implements the version existence check, considering both the latest and earliest versions. It follows Go naming conventions and the Uber Go Style Guide.

Suggestion: Consider adding a comment above the method to explain its purpose and behavior, enhancing code documentation.

Here's a suggested comment:

// VersionExists checks if the given version exists within the valid range of versions in the database.
// It returns true if the version is between the earliest version and the latest version (inclusive),
// and false otherwise. An error is returned if the latest version cannot be retrieved.
store/v2/commitment/store.go (1)

Line range hint 278-290: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for conv.UnsafeBytesToStr.

The Get method implementation looks good. It correctly handles the case when the store is not found and provides informative error messages. The error handling follows best practices by wrapping errors with additional context.

Consider adding a comment explaining the safety of using conv.UnsafeBytesToStr for converting storeKey from []byte to string. This will help other developers understand why this conversion is safe in this context.

store/v2/storage/pebbledb/db.go (1)

140-147: LGTM: New method VersionExists looks good.

The implementation of VersionExists is correct and follows good practices:

  1. It properly handles potential errors from GetLatestVersion.
  2. The logic for checking version existence is correct, comparing against both the latest and earliest versions.
  3. The method signature adheres to Go conventions, returning a bool and an error.

One minor suggestion for improvement:

  • Consider adding a comment explaining the method's purpose and behavior, especially regarding the earliest version check.

You could add a comment like this above the method:

// VersionExists checks if the given version exists in the database.
// It returns true if the version is between the earliest and latest versions, inclusive.
store/v2/root/store_test.go (2)

Line range hint 1-1010: Consider adding a specific test case for VersionedWriter.

The test suite is comprehensive and covers various aspects of the RootStore functionality. However, given the change in the newStoreWithBackendMount method signature from VersionedDatabase to VersionedWriter, it might be beneficial to add a specific test case that verifies the behavior of the RootStore with the new VersionedWriter interface.

This new test case could focus on the specific capabilities of the VersionedWriter interface and ensure that the RootStore correctly interacts with it. This would help validate the recent change and provide additional coverage for this specific interface.


Potential infinite recursion detected in newStoreWithBackendMount method.

  • The method calls itself multiple times without an apparent termination condition.

Please review the implementation to ensure that recursion is intentional and properly handled to prevent infinite loops.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 93-101: LGTM. Verify impact on test suite.

The change from store.VersionedDatabase to store.VersionedWriter in the method signature is appropriate, as it likely represents a more specific interface requirement. This change is consistent with the provided summary.

To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact the test suite, please run the following command to check all occurrences of newStoreWithBackendMount:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check all occurrences of newStoreWithBackendMount to ensure compatibility with the new signature.

rg --type go "newStoreWithBackendMount" store/v2/root/store_test.go

Length of output: 350


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all calls to newStoreWithBackendMount across the codebase to verify signature compatibility.

rg --type go "newStoreWithBackendMount"

Length of output: 462

store/v2/storage/storage_test_suite.go (1)

883-1021: LGTM! Well-structured and comprehensive test cases.

The TestVersionExists function is well-implemented with a good variety of test cases covering different scenarios. The table-driven test approach is excellent for maintainability and readability.

To further improve readability, consider grouping related test cases together and adding comments to separate these groups. For example:

// Fresh database scenarios
{
    name: "Fresh database: version 0 exists",
    // ...
},
{
    name: "Fresh database: version 1 exists",
    // ...
},

// After setting latest version scenarios
{
    name: "After setting latest version to 10, version 5 exists",
    // ...
},

// After pruning scenarios
{
    name: "After setting latest version to 10 and pruning to 5, version 4 does not exist",
    // ...
},
// ...

This grouping can make it easier to understand the different scenarios being tested at a glance.

store/v2/root/store.go (1)

126-126: Rename variable 'isExist' to 'exists' for readability

Consider renaming the variable isExist to exists to improve readability and adhere to Go naming conventions.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4733fc1 and fd3909c.

📒 Files selected for processing (17)
  • runtime/v2/store.go (1 hunks)
  • store/v2/commitment/store.go (1 hunks)
  • store/v2/database.go (2 hunks)
  • store/v2/mock/db_mock.go (1 hunks)
  • store/v2/mock/types.go (1 hunks)
  • store/v2/root/store.go (3 hunks)
  • store/v2/root/store_mock_test.go (1 hunks)
  • store/v2/root/store_test.go (1 hunks)
  • store/v2/storage/database.go (1 hunks)
  • store/v2/storage/pebbledb/db.go (1 hunks)
  • store/v2/storage/rocksdb/db.go (1 hunks)
  • store/v2/storage/rocksdb/db_noflag.go (1 hunks)
  • store/v2/storage/sqlite/db.go (2 hunks)
  • store/v2/storage/storage_bench_test.go (1 hunks)
  • store/v2/storage/storage_test_suite.go (1 hunks)
  • store/v2/storage/store.go (2 hunks)
  • store/v2/store.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (17)
runtime/v2/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/v2/commitment/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/v2/database.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/v2/mock/db_mock.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/v2/mock/types.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/v2/root/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/v2/root/store_mock_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.


Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/v2/root/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.


Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/v2/storage/database.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/v2/storage/pebbledb/db.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/v2/storage/rocksdb/db.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/v2/storage/rocksdb/db_noflag.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/v2/storage/sqlite/db.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/v2/storage/storage_bench_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.


Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/v2/storage/storage_test_suite.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/v2/storage/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/v2/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (13)
store/v2/storage/rocksdb/db_noflag.go (1)

Line range hint 1-71: Overall assessment: Changes are minimal and consistent.

The addition of the VersionExists method to the Database struct is consistent with the existing code structure and follows the established pattern for methods in this file. The new method maintains the same behavior as other methods when RocksDB is not enabled, which is to panic with an appropriate message.

The changes adhere to the Uber Golang style guide and do not introduce any new issues or inconsistencies. The file's overall structure and purpose remain unchanged.

store/v2/storage/storage_bench_test.go (1)

Line range hint 1-193: Overall assessment: Changes are consistent and well-implemented.

The modification from store.VersionedDatabase to store.VersionedWriter in the backends map is consistent with the PR objectives. The existing benchmarks (BenchmarkGet, BenchmarkApplyChangeset, BenchmarkIterate) provide sufficient coverage for the core functionalities of the new VersionedWriter interface.

No additional tests seem necessary for this specific change, as the existing benchmarks cover the main operations (Get, ApplyChangeset, Iterate) that are likely part of both the old and new interfaces.

The code adheres to the Uber Golang style guide, and the changes don't introduce any apparent issues or inconsistencies.

store/v2/storage/store.go (1)

19-19: Interface implementation change: VersionedDatabase to VersionedWriter

The type assertion has been updated to implement store.VersionedWriter instead of store.VersionedDatabase. This change suggests a shift in the expected functionality of StorageStore, focusing more on writing capabilities.

To ensure this change doesn't break existing functionality, please run the following script to check for any remaining usages of StorageStore as a VersionedDatabase:

Also, verify that all necessary methods of VersionedWriter are implemented:

Compare the output of these two commands to ensure all required methods are implemented.

✅ Verification successful

Verified: Type assertion change to VersionedWriter

All usages of StorageStore as VersionedDatabase have been removed, and StorageStore correctly implements all required methods of the VersionedWriter interface.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining usages of StorageStore as VersionedDatabase
rg --type go 'var\s+_\s+store\.VersionedDatabase\s+=\s+\(\*StorageStore\)\(nil\)'

Length of output: 83


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List all methods of VersionedWriter interface
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type VersionedWriter interface {
  $$$
}'

# List all methods of StorageStore
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type StorageStore struct {
  $$$
}

$$$

func (ss *StorageStore) $_($_) $_ {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 1238


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List all methods of StorageStore using ast-grep
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (ss *StorageStore) $_($_) $_ { $$$ }'

Length of output: 639


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List all methods of StorageStore using ripgrep
rg --type go 'func \(ss \*StorageStore\) ' --context 1

Length of output: 3154

store/v2/root/store_mock_test.go (3)

Line range hint 19-30: LGTM. Consider verifying interface implementations and updating documentation.

The change from store.VersionedDatabase to store.VersionedWriter looks good. It reflects a shift in the expected interface for state storage.

Please verify that store.VersionedWriter implements all necessary interfaces, particularly store.Pruner, as it's still being used in type assertions.

If there's a function comment for newTestRootStore (not visible in the provided code), please update it to reflect the new parameter type.


Line range hint 32-186: LGTM. Consider verifying test coverage with the new interface.

The test functions remain unchanged and continue to use the updated newTestRootStore function, which is good. This suggests that the interface change from VersionedDatabase to VersionedWriter doesn't affect the tested functionality.

Please verify that the existing tests still provide adequate coverage for all scenarios relevant to the VersionedWriter interface. Consider adding new test cases if there are any new behaviors or edge cases introduced by this interface change.


Line range hint 1-186: Overall, the changes and existing code look good.

The modification to use store.VersionedWriter instead of store.VersionedDatabase in newTestRootStore is the main change in this file. The existing tests remain unchanged and continue to use the updated function, which is positive.

Key points:

  1. The code adheres to the Uber Golang style guide.
  2. The tests appear to provide good coverage of the Store struct's methods.

To further improve the code:

  1. Ensure that the VersionedWriter interface is fully tested, including any new behaviors it might introduce.
  2. Update any relevant documentation (function comments, package documentation) to reflect the interface change.
  3. Consider adding a brief comment explaining the rationale behind the interface change from VersionedDatabase to VersionedWriter, if not already documented elsewhere.
store/v2/storage/sqlite/db.go (1)

106-110: LGTM: Improved SQL query readability

The SQL query has been reformatted from a single line to multiple lines, which significantly improves readability without changing the functionality. This change aligns with best practices for SQL formatting and the Uber Go Style Guide's emphasis on code readability.

store/v2/mock/db_mock.go (2)

408-415: LGTM: VersionExists method implementation

The VersionExists method is correctly implemented for the MockStateStorage struct. It follows the established pattern for mock methods in this file, using the gomock controller to record the method call and return mocked values.


417-421: LGTM: VersionExists recorder method implementation

The VersionExists recorder method is correctly implemented for the MockStateStorageMockRecorder struct. It follows the established pattern for mock recorder methods in this file, using the gomock controller to record the method call with the correct method type.

store/v2/root/store_test.go (1)

Line range hint 1-1010: Overall, the test suite looks robust and well-maintained.

The change in the newStoreWithBackendMount method signature from VersionedDatabase to VersionedWriter is the main modification in this file. The existing test cases cover a wide range of scenarios and appear to be comprehensive.

To further improve the test suite:

  1. Verify that all usages of newStoreWithBackendMount are compatible with the new signature.
  2. Consider adding a specific test case for the VersionedWriter interface to ensure proper coverage of the recent change.

These additions would enhance the robustness of the test suite and provide better validation for the VersionedWriter functionality within the RootStore implementation.

store/v2/root/store.go (3)

37-37: Updated 'stateStorage' field type to 'VersionedWriter'

The change of the stateStorage field type to store.VersionedWriter reflects the updated interface and aligns with the modifications in the codebase.


72-72: Updated parameter 'ss' in 'New' function to 'VersionedWriter'

The New function now accepts store.VersionedWriter as the ss parameter, which is consistent with the updated stateStorage field type.


137-137: Updated return type for 'GetStateStorage' method

The GetStateStorage method now returns store.VersionedWriter, matching the updated type of the stateStorage field.

@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ type RootStore interface {
// Backend defines the interface for the RootStore backends.
type Backend interface {
// GetStateStorage returns the SS backend.
GetStateStorage() VersionedDatabase
GetStateStorage() VersionedWriter
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Issues Found: Inconsistent Return Types for GetStateStorage()

The change from VersionedDatabase to VersionedWriter in the GetStateStorage() method affects the following implementations:

  • server/v2/cometbft/internal/mock/mock_store.go:86: MockStore still returns storev2.VersionedDatabase.
  • runtime/v2/store.go:46: GetStateStorage() returns storev2.VersionedWriter, which might conflict with existing mock implementations.

Ensure all implementations of the Backend interface are updated to use VersionedWriter to maintain consistency and prevent potential build or runtime errors.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Verify impact on dependent code.

The change from VersionedDatabase to VersionedWriter in the GetStateStorage() method signature looks good. This modification aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing the state machine functionality.

To ensure this change doesn't introduce breaking changes, please run the following script to check for any occurrences of GetStateStorage() that might be affected:

Please review the results to ensure that all occurrences are updated accordingly.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for occurrences of GetStateStorage() that might be affected by the interface change.

# Search for GetStateStorage() method calls
echo "Searching for GetStateStorage() method calls:"
rg --type go -n 'GetStateStorage\(\)'

# Search for VersionedDatabase type usage
echo "Searching for VersionedDatabase type usage:"
rg --type go -n 'VersionedDatabase'

# Search for VersionedWriter type usage
echo "Searching for VersionedWriter type usage:"
rg --type go -n 'VersionedWriter'

Length of output: 4583

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ type Store interface {
Query(storeKey []byte, version uint64, key []byte, prove bool) (storev2.QueryResult, error)

// GetStateStorage returns the SS backend.
GetStateStorage() storev2.VersionedDatabase
GetStateStorage() storev2.VersionedWriter
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Issues Found: Update Remaining VersionedDatabase References

The VersionedDatabase type is still referenced in multiple files:

  • store/v2/storage/store.go
  • store/v2/mock/types.go
  • server/v2/cometbft/internal/mock/mock_store.go

Please update these references to VersionedWriter to ensure consistency across the codebase.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM. Verify impact and update documentation if needed.

The change from storev2.VersionedDatabase to storev2.VersionedWriter for the GetStateStorage method return type looks good. This modification aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing the state machine functionality.

To ensure this change doesn't introduce any inconsistencies, please run the following script to check for any other occurrences of VersionedDatabase that might need updating:

Consider updating any relevant documentation or comments related to the GetStateStorage method to reflect this change in return type, if necessary.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other occurrences of VersionedDatabase that might need updating

# Search for VersionedDatabase usage
echo "Searching for VersionedDatabase usage:"
rg --type go "VersionedDatabase"

# Search for GetStateStorage method calls
echo "Searching for GetStateStorage method calls:"
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'GetStateStorage()'

Length of output: 897

Comment on lines 1023 to +1025
func dbApplyChangeset(
t *testing.T,
db store.VersionedDatabase,
db store.VersionedWriter,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Additional occurrences of VersionedDatabase found.

To maintain consistency across the codebase, please update the following instances from VersionedDatabase to VersionedWriter:

  • store/v2/storage/store.go
  • store/v2/mock/types.go
  • server/v2/cometbft/internal/mock/mock_store.go
🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Interface update is consistent with the codebase changes.

The change from store.VersionedDatabase to store.VersionedWriter in the dbApplyChangeset function signature is appropriate and aligns with the transition mentioned in the summary.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify if there are any other occurrences of VersionedDatabase that might need updating:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining occurrences of VersionedDatabase
rg --type go "VersionedDatabase"

Length of output: 662

Comment on lines +15 to +16
SetLatestVersion(version uint64) error
ApplyChangeset(version uint64, cs *corestore.Changeset) error
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add missing documentation for exported methods SetLatestVersion and ApplyChangeset

The methods SetLatestVersion and ApplyChangeset are exported but lack doc comments. According to the Uber Go Style Guide, all exported functions and methods should have comments that begin with the method name and clearly describe their purpose. Please add doc comments to improve code readability and maintainability.

GetLatestVersion() (uint64, error)
SetLatestVersion(version uint64) error
VersionExists(v uint64) (bool, error)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Use descriptive parameter name and add documentation for VersionExists method

The parameter v in VersionExists is not descriptive. For clarity and consistency, consider renaming it to version. Additionally, the method lacks a doc comment. As per the Uber Go Style Guide, please add a comment starting with the method name to explain its functionality.

// SetInitialVersion sets the initial version of the committer.
SetInitialVersion(version uint64) error

// GetCommitInfo returns the CommitInfo for the given version.
GetCommitInfo(version uint64) (*proof.CommitInfo, error)

Get(storeKey []byte, version uint64, key []byte) ([]byte, error)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add missing documentation for exported method Get

The method Get in the Committer interface is exported but doesn't have a doc comment. To comply with the Uber Go Style Guide, please provide a comment starting with the method name to describe its behavior and purpose.

@@ -120,19 +120,21 @@ func (s *Store) StateLatest() (uint64, corestore.ReaderMap, error) {
return v, NewReaderMap(v, s), nil
}

// StateAt checks if the requested version is present in ss.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider renaming 'StateAt' method for clarity

The method name StateAt may not clearly convey its functionality. Consider renaming it to GetStateAtVersion or GetReaderMapAtVersion to better reflect that it retrieves a ReaderMap for a specific version.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
store/v2/root/store.go (2)

130-130: Refine the comment for StateAt to accurately describe its functionality

The current comment does not fully convey the method's purpose. Consider updating it to reflect that StateAt returns a ReaderMap for the specified version if it exists.

Suggested change:

-// StateAt checks if the requested version is present in ss.
+// StateAt returns a ReaderMap for the specified version if it exists in the state storage.

133-133: Rename isExist to exists for idiomatic Go naming

Boolean variables are typically named using affirmative terms. Renaming isExist to exists improves readability and follows Go conventions.

Apply this diff:

-isExist, err := s.stateStorage.VersionExists(v)
+exists, err := s.stateStorage.VersionExists(v)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between fd3909c and 74de046.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • store/v2/root/store.go (3 hunks)
  • store/v2/root/store_test.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • store/v2/root/store_test.go
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
store/v2/root/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (3)
store/v2/root/store.go (3)

41-41: Change of stateStorage type to VersionedWriter is appropriate

The field stateStorage is updated to store.VersionedWriter, which aligns with its usage in the codebase.


77-77: Parameter type change in New function matches updated field type

The constructor now accepts ss store.VersionedWriter, reflecting the updated type of stateStorage.


144-145: Return type update in GetStateStorage aligns with field type change

The method now returns store.VersionedWriter, which is consistent with the updated stateStorage field.

Copy link
Contributor

@testinginprod testinginprod left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants