Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: fix function comments #21814

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Wukingbow
Copy link
Contributor

@Wukingbow Wukingbow commented Sep 19, 2024

Description

Partially address #19585

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation Updates

    • Adjusted comments for clarity in various functions, ensuring better understanding of their purposes.
    • Renamed comments to reflect accurate function names, enhancing documentation consistency.
  • Interface Accessibility Changes

    • Updated the visibility of the IsReferenceType method to isReferenceType, restricting its access to internal use only.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request includes several minor changes primarily focused on modifying comments and method names in the codebase. These changes involve renaming comments for clarity and adjusting method visibility from exported to unexported. The functionality of the code remains unchanged across all affected files.

Changes

File Change Summary
indexer/postgres/select.go Renamed comment for count method from "Count" to "count".
schema/type.go Renamed IsReferenceType method to isReferenceType, changing it from exported to unexported.
x/evidence/keeper/infraction.go Modified comment for handleEquivocationEvidence function to start with a lowercase letter.
x/upgrade/plan/downloader_test.go Updated comment for saveSrcTestZip function to clarify its purpose without changing functionality.
x/upgrade/plan/info_test.go Renamed comment for saveTestFile method from saveSrcTestFile to saveTestFile, aligning name and purpose.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

C:orm, backport/v0.52.x

Suggested reviewers

  • sontrinh16
  • lucaslopezf
  • akhilkumarpilli

Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b8014df and 69240d3.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • indexer/postgres/select.go (1 hunks)
  • schema/type.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evidence/keeper/infraction.go (1 hunks)
  • x/upgrade/plan/downloader_test.go (1 hunks)
  • x/upgrade/plan/info_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • indexer/postgres/select.go
  • x/evidence/keeper/infraction.go
  • x/upgrade/plan/downloader_test.go
  • x/upgrade/plan/info_test.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
schema/type.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Additional comments not posted (1)
schema/type.go (1)

21-22: Unexporting isReferenceType() may break external implementations

The method isReferenceType() has been unexported by renaming it from IsReferenceType() to isReferenceType(). This change may impact external code that implements or calls this interface method, as it will no longer be accessible outside the package. Please verify that this change does not break any external dependencies or consider keeping the method exported if it needs to remain accessible.

Run the following script to check for external usages of IsReferenceType:

Verification successful

Change to isReferenceType() is correctly implemented and consistent

The modification from IsReferenceType() to isReferenceType() has been successfully implemented across the codebase. This change is consistent with the pattern of using unexported methods in interfaces to prevent external implementations while still allowing the interface itself to be used externally.

Key observations:

  • The ReferenceType interface in schema/type.go now includes the lowercase isReferenceType() method.
  • The ReferenceType interface remains exported, allowing external code to use it.
  • There are no remaining references to the uppercase IsReferenceType in the codebase.
  • The EnumType in schema/enum.go correctly implements the lowercase isReferenceType() method.

Based on these findings, the change appears to be intentional and doesn't seem to break external dependencies, as the interface itself is still accessible.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for references to `IsReferenceType` in the codebase.

# Test: Find all references to `IsReferenceType`. Expect: No results outside of the `schema` package.
rg --type go 'IsReferenceType'

Length of output: 30


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Perform a comprehensive search for ReferenceType-related code

# Search for lowercase isReferenceType
echo "Searching for lowercase isReferenceType:"
rg --type go 'isReferenceType'

echo -e "\nPerforming case-insensitive search for ReferenceType:"
rg -i --type go 'ReferenceType'

echo -e "\nExamining interface declarations in the schema package:"
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type $_ interface { $$$ }' schema/

Length of output: 12019


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 19, 2024
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit 29077c8 Sep 19, 2024
71 of 72 checks passed
This was referenced Sep 24, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants