Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Error: rosetta: (502) bad gateway #12934

Closed
Tracked by #13327
rllola opened this issue Aug 16, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed
Tracked by #13327

Error: rosetta: (502) bad gateway #12934

rllola opened this issue Aug 16, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
@rllola
Labels
C:Rosetta Issues and PR related to Rosetta

Comments

@rllola
Copy link
Contributor

rllola commented Aug 16, 2022

Summary of Bug

Trying to start gaia from scratch with rosetta enable throw a Error: rosetta: (502) bad gateway.

Version

v7.0.3

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Download v7.0.3
  2. Setup a testnet node for theta network
  3. enable rosetta (and grpc to have rosetta working)
  4. start the node
@tac0turtle tac0turtle added the C:Rosetta Issues and PR related to Rosetta label Aug 17, 2022
@ainhoa-a ainhoa-a mentioned this issue Sep 19, 2022
Closed
20 tasks
@raynaudoe raynaudoe mentioned this issue Sep 27, 2022
Closed
@raynaudoe
Copy link
Contributor

We've already fixed this one in Zondax's fork.
The main problem was that the underlying error was being masked by the func ToRosetta which converts an error of type error to the type rosetta.Error, and the original error wasn't passing through that func.
Then, on this particular issue, the bug was that rosetta was trying to get the genesis block from the blockstore on a node which was synced using stateSync and that will just fail.

@raynaudoe raynaudoe mentioned this issue Oct 18, 2022
Closed
19 tasks
@rllola rllola mentioned this issue Oct 18, 2022
Merged
19 tasks
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 4, 2022
@rllola
fix: misc fixes for cosmos-rosetta (#13583)
39c5c07 
### Description

Closes:
#13083
#11402
#10678
#12358
#10776
#12934

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [x] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [x] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/building-modules)
- [x] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [x] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [x] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [x] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [x] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed 
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rllola rllola

Labels
C:Rosetta Issues and PR related to Rosetta
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@rllola @raynaudoe @tac0turtle @julienrbrt