Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added back package for python 3.7 #46

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vallsv
Copy link
Contributor

@vallsv vallsv commented Oct 31, 2022

It's a try to put back Python 3.7 packages.

Checklist

  • Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
  • Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
  • Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
  • Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
  • Ensured the license file is being packaged.

@conda-forge-linter
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe:

  • It looks like the 'silx' output doesn't have any tests.
  • Recipes should usually depend on matplotlib-base as opposed to matplotlib so that runtime environments do not require large packages like qt.

@tschoonj
Copy link
Contributor

Conda-forge has officially stopped building packages for 3.7.

Instead you should switch to using more recent versions of Python in your conda environments.

@tschoonj tschoonj closed this Oct 31, 2022
@vallsv
Copy link
Contributor Author

vallsv commented Oct 31, 2022

@tschoonj it's not true, according to the PR of the drop you still can pinpoint python 3.7.

conda-forge/conda-forge-pinning-feedstock#2623

"If any conda-forge package maintainers specifically need to keep Python 3.7 support they can ask on gitter for help"

So, will i have to ask on gitter for help?
Else ill just feed another channel with this recipe, but i prefer not.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants