-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
415a3ee
commit 2a1f265
Showing
3 changed files
with
318 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
Binary file added
BIN
+3.04 KB
...Online Communication and Their Effects on Relationship Research by Christian R. Genco.pdf
Binary file not shown.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ | ||
author: Christian R. Genco | ||
institution: Southern Methodist University | ||
title: Varying Definitions of Online Communication and\nTheir Effects on Relationship Research | ||
runninghead: VARYING DEFINITIONS OF ONLINE COMMUNICATION | ||
abstract: This paper explores four published articles that report on results from research conducted on online (Internet) and offline (non-Internet) relationships and their relationship to computer-mediated communication (CMC). The articles, however, vary in their definitions and uses of CMC. Butler and Kraut (2002) suggest that face-to-face (FtF) interactions are more effective than CMC, defined and used as “email,” in creating feelings of closeness or intimacy. Other articles define CMC differently and, therefore, offer different results. This paper examines Cummings, Butler, and Kraut’s (2002) research in relation to three other research articles to suggest that all forms of CMC should be studied in order to fully understand how CMC influences online and offline relationships. | ||
keywords: computer-mediated communication, face-to-face communication | ||
|
||
Numerous studies have been conducted on various facets of Internet relationships, focusing on the levels of intimacy, closeness, different communication modalities, and the frequency of use of computer-mediated communication (CMC). However, contradictory results are suggested within this research because only certain aspects of CMC are investigated, for example, email only. Cummings, Butler, and Kraut (2002) suggest that face-to-face (FtF) interactions are more effective than CMC (read: email) in creating feelings of closeness or intimacy, while other studies suggest the opposite. To understand how both online (Internet) and offline (non-Internet) relationships are affected by CMC, all forms of CMC should be studied. This paper examines Cummings et al.’s research against other CMC research to propose that additional research be conducted to better understand how online communication affects relationships. | ||
|
||
# Literature Review | ||
|
||
In Cummings et al.’s (2002) summary article reviewing three empirical studies on online social relationships, it was found that CMC, especially email, was less effective than FtF contact in creating and maintaining close social relationships. Two of the three reviewed studies focusing on communication in non-Internet and Internet relationships mediated by FtF, phone, or email modalities found that the frequency of each modality’s use was significantly linked to the strength of the particular relationship (Cummings et al., 2002). The strength of the relationship was predicted best by FtF and phone communication, as participants rated email as an inferior means of maintaining personal relationships as compared to FtF and phone contacts (Cummings et al., 2002). | ||
|
||
Cummings et al. (2002) reviewed an additional study conducted in 1999 by the HomeNet project (see Appendix A for more information on the HomeNet project). In this project, Kraut, Mukhopadhyay, Szczypula, Kiesler, and Scherlis (1999) compared the value of using CMC and non-CMC to maintain relationships with partners. They found that participants corresponded less frequently with their Internet partner (5.2 times per month) than with their non-Internet partner (7.2 times per month) (as cited in Cummings et al., 2002). This difference does not seem significant, as it is only two times less per month. However, in additional self-report surveys, participants responded feeling more distant, or less intimate, towards their Internet partner than their nonInternet partner. This finding may be attributed to participants’ beliefs that email is an inferior mode of personal relationship communication. | ||
|
||
# Discussion | ||
|
||
In 2002, Cummings et al. stated that the evidence from their research conflicted with other data examining the effectiveness of online social relationships. This statement is supported by the aforementioned discussion of other research. There may be a few possible theoretical explanations for these discrepancies. | ||
|
||
## Limitations of These Studies | ||
|
||
The discrepancies identified may result from a number of limitations found in the materials reviewed by Cummings et al. These limitations can result from technological constraints, demographic factors, or issues of modality. Each of these limitations will be examined in further detail below. | ||
|
||
### Technological limitations. | ||
|
||
First, one reviewed study by Cummings et al. (2002) examined only email correspondence for their CMC modality. Therefore, the study is limited to only one mode of communication among other alternatives, e.g., IM as studied by Hu et al. (2004). Because of its many personalized features, IM provides more personal CMC. For example, it is in real time without delay, voice-chat and video features are available for many IM programs, and text boxes can be personalized with the user’s picture, favorite colors and text, and a wide variety of emoticons, e.g., :). These options allow for both an increase in self-expression and the ability to overcompensate for the barriers of CMC through customizable features, as stated in Tidwell and Walther | ||
|
||
--- | ||
|
||
# Conclusions and Future Study | ||
|
||
In order to gain a complete understanding of CMC’s true effect on both online and offline relationships, it is necessary to conduct a study that examines all aspects of CMC. This includes, but is not limited to, email, IM, voice-chat, video-chat, online journals and diaries, online social groups with message boards, and chat rooms. The effects on relationships of each modality may be different, and this is demonstrated by the discrepancies in intimacy between email and IM correspondence. As each mode of communication becomes more prevalent in individuals’ lives, it is important to examine the impact of all modes of CMC on online and offline relationship formation, maintenance, and even termination | ||
|
||
--- | ||
|
||
# References | ||
|
||
Cummings, J. N., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social relationships. *Communications of the ACM, 45*(7), 103-108. | ||
|
||
Hu, Y., Wood, J. F., Smith, V., & Westbrook, N. (2004). Friendships through IM: Examining the relationship between instant messaging and intimacy. *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10*, 38-48. | ||
|
||
Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. *Human Communication Research, 28*, 317-348. | ||
|
||
Underwood, H., & Findlay, B. (2004). Internet relationships and their impact on primary relationships. *Behaviour Change, 21*(2), 127-140. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,274 @@ | ||
_ = require 'underscore' | ||
md = require('markdown').markdown | ||
coffee = require 'coffee-script' | ||
PDFDocument = require 'pdfkit' | ||
|
||
Array::first ?= -> @[0] | ||
|
||
Array::last ?= -> @[@length - 1] | ||
|
||
process.chdir(__dirname) | ||
|
||
# style definitions for markdown | ||
styles = | ||
default: | ||
font: 'Times-Roman' | ||
fontSize: 12 | ||
lineGap: 14 | ||
align: 'left' | ||
meta: | ||
indent: 0 | ||
title: | ||
align: 'center' | ||
para: | ||
indent: 72/2 | ||
blockquote: | ||
indent: 0 | ||
marginLeft: 72 | ||
color: 'red' | ||
font: 'Times-Italic' | ||
em: | ||
font: 'Times-Italic' | ||
strong: | ||
font: 'Times-Bold' | ||
h1: | ||
align: 'center' | ||
# h2: | ||
# font: 'Times-Italic' | ||
# h3: | ||
# font: 'Times-Bold' | ||
# align: 'center' | ||
# h4: | ||
# font: 'Times-Italic' | ||
# align: 'center' | ||
# h5: | ||
# underline: true | ||
citationHeader: | ||
align: 'center' | ||
citation: | ||
indent: -72/2 | ||
marginLeft: 72/2 | ||
|
||
# This class represents a node in the markdown tree, and can render it to pdf | ||
class Node | ||
constructor: (tree) -> | ||
# special case for text nodes | ||
if typeof tree is 'string' | ||
@type = 'text' | ||
@text = tree | ||
return | ||
|
||
@type = tree.shift() | ||
@attrs = {} | ||
|
||
if typeof tree[0] is 'object' and not Array.isArray tree[0] | ||
@attrs = tree.shift() | ||
|
||
switch @type | ||
when 'header' | ||
@type = 'h' + @attrs.level | ||
when 'img' | ||
# images are used to generate inline example output | ||
# compiles the coffeescript to JS so it can be run | ||
# in the render method | ||
@type = 'example' | ||
code = codeBlocks[@attrs.alt] | ||
@code = coffee.compile code if code | ||
@height = +@attrs.title or 0 | ||
|
||
@style = _.extend({}, styles.default, styles[@type]) | ||
|
||
# parse sub nodes | ||
@content = while tree.length | ||
child = new Node tree.shift() | ||
# blockquotes have an embedded paragraph; make sure the inner paragraph doesn't re-define | ||
# its indentation | ||
child.style?.indent = @style.indent if @style.indent? | ||
child | ||
|
||
# console.log "content =", @content | ||
# console.log "type =", @type | ||
|
||
|
||
# sets the styles on the document for this node | ||
setStyle: (doc) -> | ||
if @style.font | ||
doc.font @style.font | ||
|
||
if @style.fontSize | ||
doc.fontSize @style.fontSize | ||
|
||
if @style.color | ||
doc.fillColor @style.color | ||
else | ||
doc.fillColor 'black' | ||
|
||
# renders this node and its subnodes to the document | ||
render: (doc, continued = false) -> | ||
# console.log "rendering node: ", @ | ||
if @style.marginLeft | ||
doc.x += @style.marginLeft | ||
|
||
switch @type | ||
when 'hr' | ||
doc.addPage() | ||
else | ||
# loop through subnodes and render them | ||
for fragment, index in @content | ||
if fragment.type is 'text' | ||
@setStyle doc | ||
|
||
# remove newlines unless this is code | ||
# unless @type is 'code' | ||
# fragment.text = fragment.text.replace(/[\r\n]\s*/g, ' ') | ||
|
||
# console.log "rendering text. continued =", continued, 'attrs.continued =', @attrs.continued | ||
doc.text fragment.text, _.extend({}, @style, {continued: continued or index < @content.length - 1}) | ||
else | ||
# console.log "rendering fragment #{fragment.type}" | ||
fragment.render doc, index < @content.length - 1 and @type isnt 'bulletlist' | ||
|
||
if @style.marginBottom | ||
doc.y += @style.marginBottom | ||
if @style.marginLeft | ||
doc.x -= @style.marginLeft | ||
|
||
addAPAHeader = (doc, runningHead) -> | ||
range = doc.bufferedPageRange() # => { start: 0, count: 2 } | ||
doc.font styles.default.font | ||
for i in [range.start...range.start + range.count] | ||
doc.switchToPage(i) | ||
doc.y = 72/2 | ||
doc.x = 72 | ||
head = runningHead | ||
head = "Running head: " + head if i == 0 | ||
doc.text head, _.extend({}, styles.default, {}) | ||
|
||
doc.y = 72/2 | ||
doc.x = 72 | ||
doc.text "#{i + 1}", _.extend({}, styles.default, {align: 'right'}) | ||
|
||
# reads and renders a markdown/literate coffeescript file to the document | ||
render = (doc, tree) -> | ||
doc.font 'Times-Roman' | ||
doc.fontSize 12 | ||
|
||
codeBlocks = [] | ||
|
||
onWorksCited = false | ||
while tree.length | ||
node = new Node(tree.shift()) | ||
# console.log "node =", node | ||
if node.type == "h1" && node.content?.first()?.text?.toLowerCase() == "works cited" | ||
onWorksCited = true | ||
node.style = _.extend({}, styles.default, styles.citationHeader) | ||
|
||
if onWorksCited && node.type == "para" | ||
node.style = _.extend({}, styles.default, styles.citation) | ||
|
||
node.render(doc) | ||
|
||
doc | ||
|
||
# renders the title page of the guide | ||
# renderTitlePage = (doc) -> | ||
# title = 'PDFKit Guide' | ||
# author = 'By Devon Govett' | ||
# version = 'Version ' + require('./package.json').version | ||
|
||
# doc.font 'fonts/AlegreyaSans-Light.ttf', 60 | ||
# doc.y = doc.page.height / 2 - doc.currentLineHeight() | ||
# doc.text title, align: 'center' | ||
# w = doc.widthOfString(title) | ||
|
||
# doc.fontSize 20 | ||
# doc.y -= 10 | ||
# doc.text author, | ||
# align: 'center' | ||
# indent: w - doc.widthOfString(author) | ||
|
||
# doc.font styles.para.font, 10 | ||
# doc.text version, | ||
# align: 'center' | ||
# indent: w - doc.widthOfString(version) | ||
|
||
# doc.addPage() | ||
|
||
extractMetadata = (text) -> | ||
body = "" | ||
metadata = {} | ||
|
||
metadata_pattern = /// ^ | ||
([\w.-]+) # key | ||
\:\ # colon | ||
\s* # optional whitespace | ||
(.+) # value | ||
$/// | ||
|
||
for line in text.split("\n") | ||
if meta = line.match(metadata_pattern) | ||
key = meta[1] | ||
value = meta[2].replace(/\\n/, "\n") | ||
metadata[key] = value | ||
else | ||
body += line + "\n" | ||
|
||
{metadata: metadata, body: body} | ||
|
||
createAPADocument = (body, metadata, stream) -> | ||
tree = md.parse body | ||
tree.shift() # ignore 'markdown' first element | ||
|
||
metadata.lastName ||= metadata.author?.split(" ").last() | ||
|
||
doc = new PDFDocument | ||
bufferPages: true | ||
|
||
doc.info.Title = metadata.title.replace("\n", " ") | ||
doc.info.Author = metadata.author | ||
doc.info.Creator = "markdowntoapa by christian.gen.co" | ||
|
||
# add header | ||
doc.y = 72*3 | ||
doc.font 'Times-Roman' | ||
doc.fontSize 12 | ||
doc.text(metadata.title, _.extend({}, styles.default, styles.title)) | ||
doc.text(metadata.author, _.extend({}, styles.default, styles.title)) | ||
doc.text(metadata.institution, _.extend({}, styles.default, styles.title)) | ||
|
||
doc.addPage() | ||
|
||
# add abstract page | ||
doc.text("Abstract", _.extend({}, styles.default, styles.h1)) | ||
doc.text(metadata.abstract, _.extend({}, styles.default, {})) | ||
if metadata.keywords | ||
# TODO: more generic text writing function | ||
doc.font styles.em.font | ||
doc.text("Keywords: ", _.extend({continued: true}, styles.default, styles.para)) | ||
doc.font styles.default.font | ||
doc.text(metadata.keywords, _.extend({}, styles.default, styles.para)) | ||
|
||
doc.addPage() | ||
|
||
doc.text(metadata.title, _.extend({}, styles.default, styles.title)) | ||
|
||
# doc.pipe(stream) | ||
# render doc, tree | ||
addAPAHeader(doc, metadata.runninghead) | ||
doc.end() | ||
doc | ||
|
||
exports.extractMetadata = extractMetadata | ||
exports.createAPADocument = createAPADocument | ||
|
||
do -> | ||
# command line | ||
fs = require 'fs' | ||
filename = "apa_paper.md" | ||
content = fs.readFileSync(filename, 'utf8') | ||
content = extractMetadata(content) | ||
body = content.body | ||
metadata = content.metadata | ||
doc = createAPADocument(body, metadata) | ||
stream = fs.createWriteStream("#{metadata.title.replace("\n", ' ')} by #{metadata.author}.pdf") | ||
doc.pipe(stream) |