Return error from locking.Lock #12382
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
roosterfish
commented
Oct 13, 2023
tomponline
reviewed
Oct 14, 2023
Signed-off-by: Julian Pelizäus <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Julian Pelizäus <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Julian Pelizäus <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Julian Pelizäus <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Julian Pelizäus <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Julian Pelizäus <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Julian Pelizäus <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Julian Pelizäus <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Julian Pelizäus <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Julian Pelizäus <[email protected]>
tomponline
approved these changes
Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In case the provided context for
locking.Lock()gets cancelled an error is returned. This obsoletes any!= nilchecks for the returned unlock function.See here for some more reasoning: #12304 (comment)