Anchorage docs - fee scheme #162
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jyellick
reviewed
Apr 15, 2024
jyellick
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it's good question about how much of Bedrock we want to re-document. But, near term, I think linking as you've done and removing the outdated stuff is a good step.
We should really have a more holistic docs review, asking who the target audience of the docs is, what we want them to convey, etc.
souradeep-das
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2024
Changes to be committed: modified: contents/developer/fee-scheme.md
Changes to be committed: modified: .gitbook/contents/developer/fee-scheme.md
jyellick
force-pushed
the
mm/docs-fee-scheme
branch
from
4984648 to
4d440bc
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updates contents/developer/fee-scheme.md for Anchorage.
I have not yet removed or rewritten the "developers" section. Do people have opinions on how much detail we should have on this page, vs. telling people to refer to the upstream Bedrock resources?