008 oct 21 add a new risk popup #159
Conversation
…into 008-oct-21-add-a-new-risk-popup
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new components and modifications to existing ones within the risk management module. Key additions include the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Looks good! Thanks. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 24
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Clients/src/presentation/pages/ProjectView/RisksView/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-74: Consider splitting the component for better maintainability.The
RisksViewcomponent currently handles multiple responsibilities. Consider splitting it into smaller, focused components:
RiskSummaryView- For displaying risk summaryRiskTableView- For managing the risk table and its data transformationsRiskActionBar- For handling the add new risk button and popupThis separation would:
- Improve code maintainability
- Make testing easier
- Allow for better component reuse
Example refactor:
// RiskTableView.tsx const RiskTableView: FC<{data: ProjectRisk[] | VendorRisk[]}> = ({data}) => { // Table transformation logic here return <BasicTable data={transformedData} table="risksTable" />; }; // RiskActionBar.tsx const RiskActionBar: FC = () => { return ( <Stack direction="row" justifyContent="space-between" alignItems="flex-end"> <Typography>...</Typography> <Popup {...popupProps} /> </Stack> ); }; // RisksView.tsx const RisksView: FC<RisksViewProps> = ({risksSummary, risksData, title}) => { return ( <Stack sx={{ maxWidth: 1220 }}> <Risks {...risksSummary} /> <RiskActionBar /> <RiskTableView data={risksData} /> </Stack> ); };Clients/src/presentation/components/Modals/ComplianceFeedback/ComplianceFeedback.tsx (1)
Line range hint
18-33: Consider enhancing the file upload user experience.Since this component is part of a risk management feature where file uploads might be crucial:
- Consider adding upload progress indication
- Implement file size validation before upload
- Add preview capability for supported file types
Here's a suggested enhancement to the upload handler:
const handleFileUpload = async (e: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => { setError(null); if (e.target.files && e.target.files[0]) { const file = e.target.files[0]; // Early validation if (file.size > MAX_FILE_SIZE) { setError(`File size exceeds ${MAX_FILE_SIZE / (1024 * 1024)}MB limit`); setIsErrorModalOpen(true); return; } try { setIsUploading(true); const { error: uploadError, file: uploadedFile } = await uploadFile( file, ALLOWED_FILE_TYPES, MAX_FILE_SIZE ); if (uploadError) throw new Error(uploadError); if (uploadedFile) setFile(uploadedFile); } catch (error) { setError(error.message); setIsErrorModalOpen(true); } finally { setIsUploading(false); } } };Clients/src/presentation/components/Popup/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-114: Consider keyboard navigation and focus managementThe popup implementation could benefit from improved keyboard navigation and focus management.
- Trap focus within the modal when open
- Return focus to the trigger button when closed
- Add keyboard shortcuts (ESC to close)
Consider using MUI's Modal component instead of BasePopup as it handles these accessibility features out of the box, or implement them manually using focus-trap-react.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- Clients/src/presentation/components/AddNewRiskForm/MitigationSection/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- Clients/src/presentation/components/AddNewRiskForm/RisksSection/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- Clients/src/presentation/components/AddNewRiskForm/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- Clients/src/presentation/components/AddNewRiskForm/styles.css (1 hunks)
- Clients/src/presentation/components/CreateProjectForm/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- Clients/src/presentation/components/Modals/ComplianceFeedback/ComplianceFeedback.tsx (2 hunks)
- Clients/src/presentation/components/Modals/FileUpload/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- Clients/src/presentation/components/Modals/constants.ts (1 hunks)
- Clients/src/presentation/components/Popup/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- Clients/src/presentation/pages/ProjectView/RisksView/index.tsx (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- Clients/src/presentation/components/AddNewRiskForm/styles.css
- Clients/src/presentation/components/CreateProjectForm/index.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
Clients/src/presentation/components/Modals/FileUpload/index.tsx
[error] 15-15: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
Clients/src/presentation/components/Modals/constants.ts (1)
2-2: LGTM: File size limit is reasonable.The 10MB limit is appropriate for most document types and helps prevent abuse.
Clients/src/presentation/components/Modals/FileUpload/index.tsx (2)
1-6: LGTM! Well-organized imports with externalized constants.The imports are clean and follow best practices, with constants properly externalized for reuse.
1-76: Verify integration with AddNewRiskForm.Since this component is part of the risk management feature, we should verify its integration with the form component.
✅ Verification successful
FileUpload component is properly integrated in MitigationSection
The FileUpload component is correctly integrated within the MitigationSection component of the AddNewRiskForm. It's placed in a logical location alongside other form inputs for mitigation evidence, specifically in the third column of the form layout with the deadline picker.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check how FileUpload is integrated in AddNewRiskForm ast-grep --pattern 'import { FileUpload } from "$$$" $$$ function AddNewRiskForm($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to find where FileUpload is imported and used rg -l "FileUpload" --type tsx # Then check for AddNewRiskForm component rg -l "AddNewRiskForm" --type tsx # Also search for any form components that might be using FileUpload rg "import.*FileUpload" -A 5Length of output: 829
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the MitigationSection component to see how FileUpload is integrated cat "Clients/src/presentation/components/AddNewRiskForm/MitigationSection/index.tsx" # Also check if there are any other components using FileUpload rg "FileUpload" -A 3Length of output: 12590
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 15-15: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Clients/src/presentation/pages/ProjectView/RisksView/index.tsx (1)
1-1: LGTM! Import statements are properly organized.The new imports for
AddNewRiskFormandPopupcomponents are correctly placed alongside other component imports.Also applies to: 8-9
Clients/src/presentation/components/Modals/ComplianceFeedback/ComplianceFeedback.tsx (2)
7-7: LGTM! Good practice moving constants to a centralized location.This change improves maintainability by centralizing file upload constraints.
10-10: Verify handling of undefined activeSection state.Making
activeSectionoptional could lead to unexpected UI states. While the conditional rendering on line 52 handles this, we should verify that:
- The component behaves correctly when
activeSectionis undefined- Parent components handle this optional prop appropriately
✅ Verification successful
Making
activeSectionoptional is safe and properly handledThe change to make
activeSectionoptional is well-implemented:
- The component is only used in Controlpane/index.tsx where it's always called with a defined
activeSectionprop- The component has proper null-safety with conditional rendering using
activeSection &&on line 52- The parent component (Controlpane) maintains
activeSectionstate that can only be one of: "Overview", "Evidence", or "Auditor Feedback"🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all usages of ComplianceFeedback component to verify prop handling ast-grep --pattern 'ComplianceFeedback $$$'Length of output: 45
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for ComplianceFeedback component usage with ripgrep for better coverage rg -l "ComplianceFeedback" --type tsx # Then get the content of files containing ComplianceFeedback rg "ComplianceFeedback" -A 5 -B 5 --type tsxLength of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for ComplianceFeedback component usage without file type restriction rg -l "ComplianceFeedback" # Then get the content of files containing ComplianceFeedback rg "ComplianceFeedback" -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 1211
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the actual usage in the Controlpane component cat "Clients/src/presentation/components/Modals/Controlpane/index.tsx" # Also examine the ComplianceFeedback component implementation cat "Clients/src/presentation/components/Modals/ComplianceFeedback/ComplianceFeedback.tsx"Length of output: 10197
Clients/src/presentation/components/Popup/index.tsx (1)
67-69: Verify action button alignment in AddNewRiskFormThe switch from absolute positioning to flex-based layout (
ml: "auto") is a better practice. However, since this component is used in the new risk form context:
- Ensure the button remains visible when the form content is scrollable
- Consider if the button should be sticky at the bottom
✅ Verification successful
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
Action button positioning in Popup component is appropriate
The flex-based layout with
ml: "auto"is the correct approach here because:
- The AddNewRiskForm uses a Stack component with tabs, where content is rendered within TabPanels
- The Popup component already handles proper button positioning with a Stack layout
- The button is part of the Popup's content structure, not the form's scrollable area
The current implementation maintains button visibility as:
- The Popup component renders its content in a fixed-position container
- The action button is positioned at the bottom of this container using flex layout
- Form content is isolated within TabPanels, preventing scroll interference
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if AddNewRiskForm has any specific button positioning requirements rg -A 5 "AddNewRiskForm.*Button"Length of output: 34
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search to find the AddNewRiskForm component and its usage rg -l "AddNewRiskForm" # Then search for any button-related styling or positioning in Popup component rg -A 5 "Button|button" "Clients/src/presentation/components/Popup"Length of output: 6583
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the AddNewRiskForm component for any scroll or positioning context cat Clients/src/presentation/components/AddNewRiskForm/index.tsx # Also check if there are any specific styles or containers that might affect scrolling rg -A 5 "overflow|scroll|sticky|fixed" Clients/src/presentation/components/AddNewRiskForm/Length of output: 2028
Clients/src/presentation/components/AddNewRiskForm/MitigationSection/index.tsx (1)
1-8: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and appropriate.The imports are clean and necessary for the component's functionality.
| export const ALLOWED_FILE_TYPES = [ | ||
| "image/jpeg", | ||
| "image/png", | ||
| "image/gif", | ||
| "application/pdf", | ||
| "application/msword", | ||
| "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document", | ||
| "text/plain", | ||
| "application/vnd.ms-excel", | ||
| "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet", | ||
| "application/zip", | ||
| "application/x-rar-compressed", | ||
| ]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
File upload security measures are partially implemented but can be enhanced
The codebase already has basic security measures in place:
- MIME type validation against allowedFileTypes
- File size limit of 10MB
- Error handling for invalid uploads
However, the review suggestions are valid:
- ZIP and RAR files could indeed pose security risks as they can contain malicious content
- Excel files with macros are a legitimate security concern
- SVG support could be beneficial but needs careful sanitization
Recommendations:
- Remove
application/zipandapplication/x-rar-compressedfrom ALLOWED_FILE_TYPES - Add content validation for Excel files to detect and block macro-enabled files (.xlsm)
- If adding SVG support, implement sanitization to prevent XSS attacks
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider additional security measures and file type support.
-
Security considerations:
- ZIP and RAR archives could contain malicious files
- Excel files might contain potentially dangerous macros
-
Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding SVG support (
image/svg+xml) for vector graphics - Consider removing RAR support due to limited browser compatibility
- Consider adding SVG support (
Let's verify the file upload implementation:
Consider adding these security enhancements:
export const validateFileContent = async (file: File): Promise<boolean> => {
// Verify MIME type matches file extension
const fileExtension = file.name.split('.').pop()?.toLowerCase();
const expectedMimeType = MIME_TYPE_MAP[fileExtension];
return file.type === expectedMimeType;
};
// Add minimum file size check
export const MIN_FILE_SIZE = 1; // 1 byteLet me check the file upload implementation further to understand the validation logic.
Let me check the file upload validation implementation further.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there's additional MIME type validation beyond these constants
rg -A 5 "handleFileUpload|validateFile"
Length of output: 3108
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check uploadFile implementation and validation
rg -A 10 "uploadFile"
# Check for any size validation
rg -A 5 "size|maxSize|fileSize"
# Look for any MIME type validation
rg -A 5 "MIME|mime|type validation"
Length of output: 37805
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check uploadFile implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export const uploadFile = $_'
# Check for any file validation utilities
rg -A 10 "validateFile|fileValidation|checkFile"
# Look for MAX_FILE_SIZE constant
rg "MAX_FILE_SIZE"
Length of output: 2213
| const tabStyle = { | ||
| textTransform: "none", | ||
| fontWeight: 400, | ||
| alignItems: "flex-start", | ||
| justifyContent: "flex-end", | ||
| padding: "16px 0 7px", | ||
| minHeight: "20px" | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve styling consistency and maintainability.
Consider moving styles to a theme-based approach and using relative units for better responsiveness.
+ const useStyles = makeStyles((theme) => ({
+ tab: {
+ textTransform: "none",
+ fontWeight: 400,
+ alignItems: "flex-start",
+ justifyContent: "flex-end",
+ padding: theme.spacing(2, 0, 1),
+ minHeight: theme.spacing(2.5)
+ },
+ tabList: {
+ minHeight: theme.spacing(2.5),
+ "& .MuiTabs-flexContainer": {
+ columnGap: theme.spacing(4.25)
+ }
+ }
+ }));Also applies to: 33-37
| const AddNewRiskForm: FC = () => { | ||
| const theme = useTheme(); | ||
| const disableRipple = theme.components?.MuiButton?.defaultProps?.disableRipple; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Define component interface and extract theme configuration.
The component might need props for form submission and initial values. Also, accessing theme internals directly could be fragile.
+ interface AddNewRiskFormProps {
+ onSubmit: (data: RiskFormData) => void;
+ initialValues?: Partial<RiskFormData>;
+ }
- const AddNewRiskForm: FC = () => {
+ const AddNewRiskForm: FC<AddNewRiskFormProps> = ({ onSubmit, initialValues }) => {
const theme = useTheme();
- const disableRipple = theme.components?.MuiButton?.defaultProps?.disableRipple;
+ const disableRipple = theme.components?.MuiButton?.defaultProps?.disableRipple ?? true;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| const [value, setValue] = useState("risks"); | ||
| const handleChange = (_: React.SyntheticEvent, newValue: string) => { | ||
| setValue(newValue); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance type safety and error handling for tab management.
Consider using a type-safe approach for tab values and add validation.
+ type TabValue = 'risks' | 'mitigation';
- const [value, setValue] = useState("risks");
+ const [value, setValue] = useState<TabValue>("risks");
- const handleChange = (_: React.SyntheticEvent, newValue: string) => {
+ const handleChange = (_: React.SyntheticEvent, newValue: TabValue) => {
setValue(newValue);
};Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| import TabContext from "@mui/lab/TabContext"; | ||
| import TabList from "@mui/lab/TabList"; | ||
| import TabPanel from "@mui/lab/TabPanel"; | ||
| import { Box, Stack, Tab, useTheme } from "@mui/material"; | ||
| import { FC, useState } from "react"; | ||
| import RiskSection from "./RisksSection"; | ||
| import MitigationSection from "./MitigationSection"; | ||
| import "./styles.css" | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider optimizing imports for better bundle size.
The individual imports from @mui/lab could be consolidated. Also, consider adding type definitions for the section components.
- import TabContext from "@mui/lab/TabContext";
- import TabList from "@mui/lab/TabList";
- import TabPanel from "@mui/lab/TabPanel";
+ import { TabContext, TabList, TabPanel } from "@mui/lab";
import { Box, Stack, Tab, useTheme } from "@mui/material";
import { FC, useState } from "react";
- import RiskSection from "./RisksSection";
- import MitigationSection from "./MitigationSection";
+ import type { RiskSection } from "./RisksSection";
+ import type { MitigationSection } from "./MitigationSection";
+ import RiskSection from "./RisksSection";
+ import MitigationSection from "./MitigationSection";
import "./styles.css"Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| const [values, setValues] = useState({ | ||
| projectName: "Select project", | ||
| actionOwner: "Select owner", | ||
| aiLifecyclePhase: "Select phase", | ||
| riskDescription: "", | ||
| riskCategory: "Select category", | ||
| potentialImpact: "", | ||
| assessmentMapping: "Map assessment", | ||
| controlsMapping: "Map controls", | ||
| likelihood: "Select likelihood of risk to happen", | ||
| riskSeverity: "Select risk severity", | ||
| riskLevel: "Select risk level", | ||
| reviewNotes: "" | ||
|
|
||
| }); | ||
| const handleOnChange = (field: string, value: string | number) => { | ||
| setValues((prevValues) => ({ | ||
| ...prevValues, | ||
| [field]: value, | ||
| })); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Extract placeholder strings as constants and implement proper risk level calculation.
Several improvements needed for the state management:
- Move placeholder strings to constants
- Implement automatic risk level calculation
- Add form validation
// Constants
const PLACEHOLDERS = {
PROJECT: "Select project",
OWNER: "Select owner",
PHASE: "Select phase",
// ... other placeholders
} as const;
// Initial state
const initialValues: RiskFormValues = {
projectName: "",
actionOwner: "",
// ... other fields
};
// Add validation
const [errors, setErrors] = useState<Partial<Record<keyof RiskFormValues, string>>>({});
// Calculate risk level automatically
useEffect(() => {
if (values.likelihood && values.riskSeverity) {
const level = calculateRiskLevel(values.likelihood, values.riskSeverity);
setValues(prev => ({ ...prev, riskLevel: level }));
}
}, [values.likelihood, values.riskSeverity]);| placeholder="Select project" | ||
| value={values.projectName} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("projectName", e.target.value)} | ||
| items={[ | ||
| { _id: 1, name: "Some value 1" }, | ||
| { _id: 2, name: "Some value 2" }, | ||
| { _id: 3, name: "Some value 3" }, | ||
| ]} | ||
| sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Field | ||
| id="risk-description-input" | ||
| label="Risk description" | ||
| width={324} | ||
| value={values.riskDescription} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("riskDescription", e.target.value)} | ||
| sx={{ | ||
| backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main, | ||
| "& input": { | ||
| padding: "0 14px" | ||
| } | ||
| }} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Select | ||
| id="assessment-mapping-input" | ||
| label="Assessment mapping" | ||
| placeholder="Map assessment" | ||
| value={values.assessmentMapping} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("assessmentMapping", e.target.value)} | ||
| items={[ | ||
| { _id: 1, name: "Some value 1" }, | ||
| { _id: 2, name: "Some value 2" }, | ||
| { _id: 3, name: "Some value 3" }, | ||
| ]} | ||
| sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Select | ||
| id="action-owner-input" | ||
| label="Action owner" | ||
| placeholder="Select owner" | ||
| value={values.actionOwner} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("actionOwner", e.target.value)} | ||
| items={[ | ||
| { _id: 1, name: "Some value 1" }, | ||
| { _id: 2, name: "Some value 2" }, | ||
| { _id: 3, name: "Some value 3" }, | ||
| ]} | ||
| sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Select | ||
| id="risk-category-input" | ||
| label="Risk category" | ||
| placeholder="Select category" | ||
| value={values.riskCategory} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("riskCategory", e.target.value)} | ||
| items={[ | ||
| { _id: 1, name: "Some value 1" }, | ||
| { _id: 2, name: "Some value 2" }, | ||
| { _id: 3, name: "Some value 3" }, | ||
| ]} | ||
| sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Select | ||
| id="controls-mapping-input" | ||
| label="Controls mapping" | ||
| placeholder="Map controls" | ||
| value={values.controlsMapping} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("controlsMapping", e.target.value)} | ||
| items={[ | ||
| { _id: 1, name: "Some value 1" }, | ||
| { _id: 2, name: "Some value 2" }, | ||
| { _id: 3, name: "Some value 3" }, | ||
| ]} | ||
| sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Stack> | ||
| <Stack sx={{ rowGap: 8.5 }}> | ||
| <Select | ||
| id="ai-lifecycle-phase-input" | ||
| label="AI lifecycle phase" | ||
| placeholder="Select phase" | ||
| value={values.aiLifecyclePhase} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("aiLifecyclePhase", e.target.value)} | ||
| items={[ | ||
| { _id: 1, name: "Some value 1" }, | ||
| { _id: 2, name: "Some value 2" }, | ||
| { _id: 3, name: "Some value 3" }, | ||
| ]} | ||
| sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Field | ||
| id="potential-impact-input" | ||
| label="Potential Impact" | ||
| type="description" | ||
| value={values.potentialImpact} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("potentialImpact", e.target.value)} | ||
| sx={{ backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Stack> | ||
| </Stack> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve form structure and accessibility.
Several areas need improvement:
- Extract mock data to a separate constant
- Use theme spacing for consistency
- Add proper accessibility attributes
// Extract mock data
const MOCK_OPTIONS = [
{ _id: 1, name: "Some value 1" },
{ _id: 2, name: "Some value 2" },
{ _id: 3, name: "Some value 3" },
] as const;
// Use in Select components
<Select
id="project-name-input"
label="Project name"
placeholder={PLACEHOLDERS.PROJECT}
value={values.projectName}
onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("projectName", e.target.value)}
items={MOCK_OPTIONS}
required
aria-required="true"
aria-label="Select project name"
sx={{ width: theme.spacing(40.5), backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }}
/>| <Divider /> | ||
| <Stack sx={{ mt: 4.5 }}> | ||
| <Field | ||
| id="review-notes-input" | ||
| label="Review notes" | ||
| type="description" | ||
| value={values.reviewNotes} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("reviewNotes", e.target.value)} | ||
| sx={{ backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Stack> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance review notes functionality.
Consider adding these improvements to the review notes section:
- Add character limit and counter
- Implement rich text formatting
- Add autosave functionality
<Field
id="review-notes-input"
label="Review notes"
type="description"
value={values.reviewNotes}
onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("reviewNotes", e.target.value)}
maxLength={1000}
multiline
rows={4}
helperText={`${values.reviewNotes.length}/1000 characters`}
sx={{ backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }}
/>| <Divider /> | ||
| <Typography sx={{ fontSize: 16, fontWeight: 600, mt: 6.5 }}>Calculate risk level</Typography> | ||
| <Typography sx={{ fontSize: theme.typography.fontSize, mb: 8 }}>The Risk Level is calculated by multiplying the Likelihood and Severity scores. By assigning these scores, the risk level will be determined based on your inputs.</Typography> | ||
| <Stack sx={{ flexDirection: "row", justifyContent: "space-between", mb: 17.5 }}> | ||
| <Select | ||
| id="likelihood-input" | ||
| label="Likelihood" | ||
| placeholder="Select likelihood of risk to happen" | ||
| value={values.likelihood} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("likelihood", e.target.value)} | ||
| items={[ | ||
| { _id: 1, name: "Some value 1" }, | ||
| { _id: 2, name: "Some value 2" }, | ||
| { _id: 3, name: "Some value 3" }, | ||
| ]} | ||
| sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Select | ||
| id="risk-severity-input" | ||
| label="Risk severity" | ||
| placeholder="Select risk severity" | ||
| value={values.riskSeverity} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("riskSeverity", e.target.value)} | ||
| items={[ | ||
| { _id: 1, name: "Some value 1" }, | ||
| { _id: 2, name: "Some value 2" }, | ||
| { _id: 3, name: "Some value 3" }, | ||
| ]} | ||
| sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Select | ||
| id="risk-level-input" | ||
| label="Risk level (auto-calculated)" | ||
| placeholder="Select risk level" | ||
| value={values.riskLevel} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("riskLevel", e.target.value)} | ||
| items={[ | ||
| { _id: 1, name: "Some value 1" }, | ||
| { _id: 2, name: "Some value 2" }, | ||
| { _id: 3, name: "Some value 3" }, | ||
| ]} | ||
| sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Stack> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Revise risk level calculation implementation.
The current implementation allows manual selection of the risk level, which contradicts the auto-calculation logic. Consider these improvements:
- Replace the risk level Select with a read-only display
- Add validation for likelihood and severity inputs
- Show visual feedback of the calculation
- <Select
- id="risk-level-input"
- label="Risk level (auto-calculated)"
- placeholder="Select risk level"
- value={values.riskLevel}
- onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("riskLevel", e.target.value)}
- items={[...]}
- sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }}
- />
+ <Stack spacing={1}>
+ <Typography variant="subtitle1">Risk Level (auto-calculated)</Typography>
+ <Typography
+ variant="h6"
+ sx={{
+ p: 2,
+ bgcolor: theme.palette.background.main,
+ color: getRiskLevelColor(values.riskLevel)
+ }}
+ >
+ {values.riskLevel || 'Pending calculation'}
+ </Typography>
+ </Stack>Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Select | ||
| id="controls-mapping-input" | ||
| label="Controls mapping" | ||
| placeholder="Map controls" | ||
| value={values.controlsMapping} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("controlsMapping", e.target.value)} | ||
| items={[ | ||
| { _id: 1, name: "Some value 1" }, | ||
| { _id: 2, name: "Some value 2" }, | ||
| { _id: 3, name: "Some value 3" }, | ||
| ]} | ||
| sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Stack> | ||
| <Stack sx={{ rowGap: 8.5 }}> | ||
| <Select | ||
| id="ai-lifecycle-phase-input" | ||
| label="AI lifecycle phase" | ||
| placeholder="Select phase" | ||
| value={values.aiLifecyclePhase} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("aiLifecyclePhase", e.target.value)} | ||
| items={[ | ||
| { _id: 1, name: "Some value 1" }, | ||
| { _id: 2, name: "Some value 2" }, | ||
| { _id: 3, name: "Some value 3" }, | ||
| ]} | ||
| sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Field | ||
| id="potential-impact-input" | ||
| label="Potential Impact" | ||
| type="description" | ||
| value={values.potentialImpact} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("potentialImpact", e.target.value)} | ||
| sx={{ backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Stack> | ||
| </Stack> | ||
| <Divider /> | ||
| <Typography sx={{ fontSize: 16, fontWeight: 600, mt: 6.5 }}>Calculate risk level</Typography> | ||
| <Typography sx={{ fontSize: theme.typography.fontSize, mb: 8 }}>The Risk Level is calculated by multiplying the Likelihood and Severity scores. By assigning these scores, the risk level will be determined based on your inputs.</Typography> | ||
| <Stack sx={{ flexDirection: "row", justifyContent: "space-between", mb: 17.5 }}> | ||
| <Select | ||
| id="likelihood-input" | ||
| label="Likelihood" | ||
| placeholder="Select likelihood of risk to happen" | ||
| value={values.likelihood} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("likelihood", e.target.value)} | ||
| items={[ | ||
| { _id: 1, name: "Some value 1" }, | ||
| { _id: 2, name: "Some value 2" }, | ||
| { _id: 3, name: "Some value 3" }, | ||
| ]} | ||
| sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Select | ||
| id="risk-severity-input" | ||
| label="Risk severity" | ||
| placeholder="Select risk severity" | ||
| value={values.riskSeverity} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("riskSeverity", e.target.value)} | ||
| items={[ | ||
| { _id: 1, name: "Some value 1" }, | ||
| { _id: 2, name: "Some value 2" }, | ||
| { _id: 3, name: "Some value 3" }, | ||
| ]} | ||
| sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Select | ||
| id="risk-level-input" | ||
| label="Risk level (auto-calculated)" | ||
| placeholder="Select risk level" | ||
| value={values.riskLevel} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("riskLevel", e.target.value)} | ||
| items={[ | ||
| { _id: 1, name: "Some value 1" }, | ||
| { _id: 2, name: "Some value 2" }, | ||
| { _id: 3, name: "Some value 3" }, | ||
| ]} | ||
| sx={{ width: 324, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Stack> | ||
| <Divider /> | ||
| <Stack sx={{ mt: 4.5 }}> | ||
| <Field | ||
| id="review-notes-input" | ||
| label="Review notes" | ||
| type="description" | ||
| value={values.reviewNotes} | ||
| onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("reviewNotes", e.target.value)} | ||
| sx={{ backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main }} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Stack> | ||
| </Stack> | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| export default RiskSection; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add error handling and state management to the risk form
The codebase analysis reveals several missing critical features in the RiskSection component:
- No error handling despite other authentication forms having it
- No integration with the application's network layer (
customAxios.ts) - Missing loading states while other components implement them
- Form data is not persisted despite Redux store being available
Required changes:
- Integrate with the network service layer at
infrastructure/api/networkServices.ts - Add loading states using patterns found in other components
- Implement error handling similar to other form components
- Connect to Redux store for state persistence
- Add proper validation before submission
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify error handling and data persistence.
Please ensure:
- Form data persistence across sessions
- Error boundary implementation
- Loading states for async operations
- Proper error handling for network failures
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for error boundary implementations in the codebase
echo "Searching for error boundary implementations..."
rg -l "ErrorBoundary|componentDidCatch|getDerivedStateFromError" --type typescript
# Search for loading state patterns
echo "Searching for loading state patterns..."
rg -l "isLoading|loading|pending" --type typescript
# Search for error handling patterns
echo "Searching for error handling patterns..."
rg -l "try.*catch|error\s*=|onError" --type typescript
Length of output: 585
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for error boundary implementations in the codebase
echo "Searching for error boundary implementations..."
rg -l "ErrorBoundary|componentDidCatch|getDerivedStateFromError"
# Search for loading state patterns
echo "Searching for loading state patterns..."
rg -l "isLoading|loading|pending"
# Search for error handling patterns
echo "Searching for error handling patterns..."
rg -l "try.*catch|error\s*=|onError"
# Search for form state persistence patterns
echo "Searching for form state persistence..."
rg -l "localStorage|sessionStorage|persist"
# Search for network request handling
echo "Searching for network request patterns..."
rg -l "fetch|axios|api|request"
Length of output: 2839
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
AddNewRiskFormwith sections for managing risks and mitigation details.FileUploadcomponent for uploading mitigation evidence documents.RisksViewby integrating aPopupfor adding new risks.Improvements
Bug Fixes
ComplianceFeedback.These updates enhance the risk management capabilities and improve the overall user interface.