Feat/fe/statuspage 1 #1306
Closed
Feat/fe/statuspage 1 #1306
+177
−12
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
jennifer-gan
commented
Dec 6, 2024
jennifer-gan
commented
- create status page when there is no configuration
- Fix Checkbox component conditionally level up the checkbox position so that publish to public checkbox looks correctly in layout
- General Settings tab Initial layout - WIP
- Create CreateStatus page -WIP
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a new route for creating a status in the React application, along with the addition of a sidebar menu item for "Status pages." New components, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Client/src/Pages/Status/index.jsx (1)
36-45: Yo dawg, let's make this button more accessible!The button looks clean, but we should add some ARIA attributes to make it sing for screen readers. Also, that click handler could use some error boundaries, eh?
Here's a better version:
<Button variant="contained" color="primary" + aria-label="Create new status page" + role="button" onClick={() => { + try { navigate("/status/create"); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Navigation failed:', error); + } }} sx={{ fontWeight: 500 }} > Let's create your status page </Button>Client/src/Components/Inputs/Checkbox/index.jsx (1)
43-43: Yo! Let's make this style override more robust, dawg! 🎵The current implementation could be more flexible. Consider these improvements:
- Use explicit type checking with
typeof label === 'string'- Allow for custom alignment through props
- Consider handling other label types (e.g., ReactNode)
-const override = typeof label == "string" ? {} : { alignSelf: "flex-start" }; +const getAlignmentStyle = (label, customAlignment) => { + if (customAlignment) return { alignSelf: customAlignment }; + return typeof label === 'string' ? {} : { alignSelf: "flex-start" }; +}; +const override = getAlignmentStyle(label, props.alignment);Also applies to: 61-61
Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.jsx (1)
Line range hint
82-87: Yo! We forgot to drop the status page in the PATH_MAP! 🎤Add the status page mapping to maintain consistency with other routes:
const PATH_MAP = { monitors: "Dashboard", pagespeed: "Dashboard", infrastructure: "Dashboard", + status: "Dashboard", account: "Account", settings: "Other", };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Client/src/App.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Components/Inputs/Checkbox/index.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Status/GeneralSettingsPanel.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Status/CreateStatus/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Status/index.jsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Client/src/App.jsx (1)
44-44: Straight fire! The route setup is clean! 🔥
The new status page route is well-integrated:
- Protected route implementation ✓
- Consistent with existing patterns ✓
- Proper component import ✓
Also applies to: 152-155
Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.jsx (1)
46-46: Mom's spaghetti... but this code is ready! 🍝
The status pages menu integration looks solid:
- Icon import follows convention ✓
- Menu structure maintains consistency ✓
- Path aligns with router config ✓
Also applies to: 55-55
Comment on lines
+37
to
+73
| <TabContext value={tab}> | ||
| <Box | ||
| sx={{ | ||
| borderBottom: 1, | ||
| borderColor: theme.palette.border.light, | ||
| "& .MuiTabs-root": { height: "fit-content", minHeight: "0" }, | ||
| }} | ||
| > | ||
| <TabList | ||
| onChange={handleTabChange} | ||
| aria-label="status tabs" | ||
| > | ||
| {tabList.map((label, index) => ( | ||
| <Tab | ||
| label={label} | ||
| key={index} | ||
| value={label.toLowerCase()} | ||
| sx={{ | ||
| fontSize: 13, | ||
| color: theme.palette.text.tertiary, | ||
| textTransform: "none", | ||
| minWidth: "fit-content", | ||
| minHeight: 0, | ||
| paddingLeft: 0, | ||
| paddingY: theme.spacing(4), | ||
| fontWeight: 400, | ||
| marginRight: theme.spacing(8), | ||
| "&:focus": { | ||
| outline: "none", | ||
| }, | ||
| }} | ||
| /> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </TabList> | ||
| </Box> | ||
| <GeneralSettingsPanel /> | ||
| </TabContext> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
This tab context needs some error boundaries and loading states!
The tab navigation could break if something goes wrong, and users won't know what's happening.
Here's a more robust implementation:
+const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false);
+const [error, setError] = useState(null);
+if (error) {
+ return <Box>Error loading status page: {error.message}</Box>;
+}
<TabContext value={tab}>
+ {isLoading ? (
+ <Box>Loading...</Box>
+ ) : (
<Box
sx={{
borderBottom: 1,
borderColor: theme.palette.border.light,
"& .MuiTabs-root": { height: "fit-content", minHeight: "0" },
}}
>
// ... rest of the code
</Box>
+ )}
</TabContext>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: This PR introduces the creation of a status page when no configuration exists, fixes the Checkbox component's positioning, and sets up the initial layout for the General Settings tab. These changes enhance user experience by providing a default status page and improving the layout of the settings tab.
- Key components modified:
App.jsx,Checkbox/index.jsx,Sidebar/index.jsx,GeneralSettingsPanel.jsx,CreateStatus/index.jsx,Status/index.jsx. - Impact assessment: The changes impact the navigation and layout of the status page and the Checkbox component's behavior.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: The sidebar and main navigation are updated to include the new status page functionality. No significant dependency changes, but the new components and routes need to be tested for integration.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: Added new routes and components for the status page creation and settings tab.
- Component interactions: The
CreateStatuscomponent interacts with theGeneralSettingsPaneland the navigation system. - Integration points: The sidebar and main navigation are updated to include the new status page functionality.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
Client/src/App.jsx - App
- Submitted PR Code:
+import CreateStatus from "./Pages/Status/CreateStatus"; <Route + path="status/create" + element={<ProtectedRoute Component={CreateStatus} />} +/>
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The new route for
CreateStatusis added, which is good for navigation. However, ensure that theProtectedRoutecomponent correctly handles authentication and authorization for this new route. - Edge cases and error handling: Consider scenarios where the user is not authorized to access the
CreateStatuspage. Ensure proper redirection or error handling. - Cross-component impact: The addition of this route affects the overall navigation structure.
- Business logic considerations: This change aligns with the business requirement to create a status page.
- Current logic and potential issues: The new route for
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// Ensure ProtectedRoute handles unauthorized access gracefully const ProtectedRoute = ({ Component, ...rest }) => { const { user } = useSelector((state) => state.auth); const isAuthorized = user && user.roles.includes('admin'); // Example check return isAuthorized ? ( <Route {...rest} element={<Component />} /> ) : ( <Navigate to="/login" /> ); };
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures that the new route is correctly protected and integrated.
- Business value: Maintains security and user experience.
- Risk assessment: Low risk, but essential for maintaining the application's security posture.
- Analysis:
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Checkbox/index.jsx - Checkbox
- Submitted PR Code:
+const override = typeof label == "string" ? {} : { alignSelf: "flex-start" }; -alignSelf: "flex-start", +...override
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The conditional override for
alignSelfbased on the label type is a good approach. However, ensure that this change does not affect other checkboxes that rely on the previous behavior. - Edge cases and error handling: Test with different label types and ensure that the layout remains consistent.
- Cross-component impact: This change affects all instances where the
Checkboxcomponent is used. - Business logic considerations: Ensures that the checkbox layout is consistent and visually appealing.
- Current logic and potential issues: The conditional override for
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// Ensure the override logic is robust and handles all edge cases const override = typeof label === "string" ? {} : { alignSelf: "flex-start" };
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures consistent and predictable behavior of the
Checkboxcomponent. - Business value: Improves the user interface and experience.
- Risk assessment: Low risk, but important for maintaining UI consistency.
- Technical benefits: Ensures consistent and predictable behavior of the
- Analysis:
Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.jsx - Sidebar
- Submitted PR Code:
+import StatusPages from "../../assets/icons/status-pages.svg?react"; +{ name: "Status pages", path: "status", icon: <StatusPages /> },
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: Adding the
StatusPagesicon and route to the sidebar is straightforward. Ensure that the icon is correctly displayed and the route is functional. - Edge cases and error handling: Test the sidebar navigation to ensure that the new item integrates well with existing items.
- Cross-component impact: This change affects the sidebar navigation and user interaction.
- Business logic considerations: Aligns with the business requirement to provide easy access to the status page.
- Current logic and potential issues: Adding the
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// Ensure the icon is correctly imported and used import StatusPages from "../../assets/icons/status-pages.svg?react";
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures that the sidebar navigation is up-to-date and functional.
- Business value: Improves user experience by providing easy access to the status page.
- Risk assessment: Low risk, but essential for maintaining navigation integrity.
- Analysis:
Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Status/GeneralSettingsPanel.jsx - GeneralSettingsPanel
- Submitted PR Code:
+const GeneralSettingsPanel = () => { + const theme = useTheme(); + const dispatch = useDispatch(); + const { user, authToken, isLoading } = useSelector((state) => state.auth); + const [localData, setLocalData] = useState({}); + const [errors, setErrors] = useState({}); + const [file, setFile] = useState(); + const handleSubmit = () => {}; + const handleChange = () => {}; + const handleBlur = () => {}; + return ( + <TabPanel value="general settings" sx={{ "& h1, & p, & input": { color: theme.palette.text.tertiary, }, }}> + <Stack component="form" className="status-general-settings-form" onSubmit={handleSubmit} noValidate spellCheck="false" gap={theme.spacing(12)} mt={theme.spacing(6)}> + <ConfigBox> + <Box> + <Stack gap={theme.spacing(6)}> + <Typography component="h2">Access</Typography> + <Typography component="p">If your status page is ready, you can mark it as published.</Typography> + </Stack> + </Box> + <Checkbox id="published-to-public" label={`Published and visible to the public`} onChange={(e) => handleChange(e)} onBlur={handleBlur} /> + </ConfigBox> + </Stack> + </TabPanel> + ); +};
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The initial layout for the
GeneralSettingsPanelis set up correctly. However, thehandleSubmit,handleChange, andhandleBlurfunctions are placeholders and need to be implemented. - Edge cases and error handling: Ensure that form validation and error handling are implemented for a robust user experience.
- Cross-component impact: This component will be used within the
CreateStatuspage, affecting the overall settings tab functionality. - Business logic considerations: Aligns with the business requirement to provide a settings panel for the status page.
- Current logic and potential issues: The initial layout for the
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// Implement the handleSubmit, handleChange, and handleBlur functions with proper logic const handleSubmit = (event) => { event.preventDefault(); // Implement form submission logic here }; const handleChange = (event) => { const { name, value } = event.target; setLocalData({ ...localData, [name]: value }); }; const handleBlur = (event) => { const { name, value } = event.target; // Implement validation logic here };
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures that the settings panel is functional and robust.
- Business value: Provides a complete and functional settings panel for the status page.
- Risk assessment: Medium risk, as the current implementation is incomplete.
- Analysis:
Client/src/Pages/Status/CreateStatus/index.jsx - CreateStatus
- Submitted PR Code:
+const CreateStatus = ({ open = "general settings" }) => { + const theme = useTheme(); + const navigate = useNavigate(); + const tab = open; + const handleTabChange = (event, newTab) => { + navigate(`/status/${newTab}`); + }; + const { user } = useSelector((state) => state.auth); + const requiredRoles = ["superadmin", "admin"]; + let tabList = ["General Settings", "Contents"]; + return ( + <Box className="status" px={theme.spacing(20)} py={theme.spacing(12)} border={1} borderColor={theme.palette.border.light} borderRadius={theme.shape.borderRadius} backgroundColor={theme.palette.background.main}> + <TabContext value={tab}> + <Box sx={{ borderBottom: 1, borderColor: theme.palette.border.light, "& .MuiTabs-root": { height: "fit-content", minHeight: "0" }, }}> + <TabList onChange={handleTabChange} aria-label="status tabs"> + {tabList.map((label, index) => ( + <Tab label={label} key={index} value={label.toLowerCase()} sx={{ fontSize: 13, color: theme.palette.text.tertiary, textTransform: "none", minWidth: "fit-content", minHeight: 0, paddingLeft: 0, paddingY: theme.spacing(4), fontWeight: 400, marginRight: theme.spacing(8), "&:focus": { outline: "none" }, }} /> + ))} + </TabList> + </Box> + <GeneralSettingsPanel /> + </TabContext> + </Box> + ); +};
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The
CreateStatuspage is set up with tabs for general settings and contents. Ensure that theGeneralSettingsPaneland future content panels are correctly integrated. - Edge cases and error handling: Test the tab navigation and ensure that the panels load correctly.
- Cross-component impact: This page will be a central part of the status page creation process, affecting user interaction and data flow.
- Business logic considerations: Aligns with the business requirement to provide a structured way to create and manage status pages.
- Current logic and potential issues: The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// Ensure the tab navigation is robust and handles all edge cases const handleTabChange = (event, newTab) => { if (tabList.includes(newTab)) { navigate(`/status/${newTab}`); } };
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures that the status page creation process is structured and user-friendly.
- Business value: Provides a complete and functional status page creation interface.
- Risk assessment: Medium risk, as the integration of future content panels needs to be tested.
- Analysis:
Client/src/Pages/Status/index.jsx - Status
- Submitted PR Code:
+const navigate = useNavigate(); +<Stack alignItems="center" mt={theme.spacing(10)}> + <Button variant="contained" color="primary" onClick={() => { navigate("/status/create"); }} sx={{ fontWeight: 500 }}> + Let's create your status page + </Button> +</Stack>
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: Adding a button to navigate to the status page creation is a good user experience enhancement. Ensure that the button is visible and accessible.
- Edge cases and error handling: Test the button's functionality and ensure that it correctly navigates to the
CreateStatuspage. - Cross-component impact: This change affects the user's entry point to the status page creation process.
- Business logic considerations: Aligns with the business requirement to provide an easy way to create a status page.
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// Ensure the button is accessible and visible <Button variant="contained" color="primary" onClick={() => { navigate("/status/create"); }} sx={{ fontWeight: 500, marginTop: theme.spacing(10) }}> Let's create your status page </Button>
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures that users can easily access the status page creation process.
- Business value: Improves user experience and engagement.
- Risk assessment: Low risk, but essential for maintaining user experience.
- Analysis:
2.2 Implementation Quality
-
Code Structure:
- Organization and modularity: The code is well-organized, with clear separation of concerns. Each component has a specific responsibility.
- Design pattern adherence: The use of React hooks and context providers is appropriate and follows best practices.
- Reusability aspects: The components are designed to be reusable, with props and context providing flexibility.
- Maintainability factors: The code is maintainable, with clear naming conventions and modular structure.
-
Error Handling:
- Exception scenarios coverage: The current implementation lacks comprehensive error handling, especially in form submissions and navigation.
- Recovery mechanisms: Implement recovery mechanisms for failed form submissions and navigation errors.
- Logging and monitoring: Ensure that errors are logged and monitored for quick resolution.
- User experience impact: Proper error handling will improve the user experience by providing clear feedback on errors.
-
Performance Considerations:
- Resource utilization: The changes do not introduce significant performance overhead.
- Scalability aspects: The components are designed to be scalable, with modular and reusable code.
- Bottleneck analysis: No apparent bottlenecks in the current implementation.
- Optimization opportunities: Consider lazy loading the
GeneralSettingsPaneland other tabs to improve initial load performance.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
🔴 Critical Issues
- Issue description: The
handleSubmit,handleChange, andhandleBlurfunctions inGeneralSettingsPanelare placeholders and need to be implemented. - Impact:
- Technical implications: The settings panel will not function correctly without proper event handling.
- Business consequences: Users will not be able to save or update settings, leading to a poor user experience.
- User experience effects: Users will encounter non-functional forms, leading to frustration.
- Recommendation:
- Specific code changes: Implement the
handleSubmit,handleChange, andhandleBlurfunctions with proper logic. - Configuration updates: Ensure that the form data is correctly handled and validated.
- Testing requirements: Thoroughly test the form submission and data handling.
- Specific code changes: Implement the
🟡 Warnings
- Warning description: Lack of comprehensive error handling in form submissions and navigation.
- Potential risks:
- Performance implications: Users may encounter unexpected errors without clear feedback.
- Maintenance overhead: Debugging and maintaining the code will be more challenging without proper error handling.
- Future scalability: As the application grows, the lack of error handling will become more problematic.
- Suggested improvements:
- Implementation approach: Add comprehensive error handling for form submissions and navigation.
- Migration strategy: Gradually introduce error handling in critical areas and expand as needed.
- Testing considerations: Test various error scenarios to ensure robust error handling.
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects: The code is maintainable, with clear naming conventions and modular structure.
- Readability issues: Ensure that the code is well-documented and follows consistent styling.
- Performance bottlenecks: No apparent bottlenecks in the current implementation.
4. Security Assessment
- Authentication/Authorization impacts: Ensure that the new routes and components are properly secured.
- Data handling concerns: No significant data handling concerns in the current implementation.
- Input validation: Ensure that all user inputs are validated to prevent security vulnerabilities.
- Security best practices: Follow security best practices for route protection and data handling.
- Potential security risks: Ensure that the
ProtectedRoutecomponent correctly handles authentication and authorization. - Mitigation strategies: Implement proper authentication and authorization checks for new routes.
- Security testing requirements: Conduct thorough security testing for the new routes and components.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis: Ensure that all new components and functions have unit tests.
- Integration test requirements: Test the integration of new components with existing systems, such as navigation and form submissions.
- Edge cases coverage: Validate edge cases for form submissions, navigation, and component rendering.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Example test case for handleSubmit
test('handleSubmit prevents default and calls form submission logic', () => {
const event = { preventDefault: jest.fn() };
handleSubmit(event);
expect(event.preventDefault).toHaveBeenCalled();
// Add more assertions for form submission logic
});- Coverage improvements: Ensure that all new components and functions are covered by tests.
- Performance testing needs: Monitor performance benchmarks to ensure that the changes do not introduce significant overhead.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation updates needed: Update the documentation to include the new routes and components.
- Long-term maintenance considerations: Ensure that the code is well-documented and follows consistent styling for easy maintenance.
- Technical debt and monitoring requirements: Monitor technical debt and address any issues that arise during maintenance.
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment impact and strategy: Ensure that the new routes and components are properly deployed and integrated with the existing system.
- Key operational considerations: Monitor the deployment for any issues and address them promptly.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
-
Critical changes required:
- Implement the
handleSubmit,handleChange, andhandleBlurfunctions inGeneralSettingsPanel.
- Implement the
-
Important improvements suggested:
- Add comprehensive error handling for form submissions and navigation.
-
Best practices to implement:
- Follow security best practices for route protection and data handling.
-
Cross-cutting concerns to address:
- Ensure that the
ProtectedRoutecomponent correctly handles authentication and authorization.
- Ensure that the
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path: Continuously improve the error handling and security of the application.
- Business capability evolution: Enhance the status page creation process based on user feedback and business requirements.
- System integration impacts: Ensure that the new components and routes are well-integrated with the existing system.
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
ajhollid
requested changes
Dec 8, 2024
| }) => { | ||
| /* TODO move sizes to theme */ | ||
| const sizes = { small: "14px", medium: "16px", large: "18px" }; | ||
| const theme = useTheme(); | ||
| const override = alignSelf? { alignSelf: "flex-start" } : {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am not sure what this is doing, can you provide a print screen @shemy-gan ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The use case is when the label is an element instead of string, it will align the checkbox on top of the container vertically; Alex suggested to expose this explicitly, so the fix was here :54c2826
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you show the two cases in a print screen?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please move on to feat/fe/statuspage 2, the layout is as below
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"Please move on to feat/fe/statuspage 2" what do you mean?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This part layout has already been updated in the next branch feat/fe/statuspage 2, and there is a PR for that also
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, ok. So should we close this PR, since it is already contemplated in the other one?
Comment on lines
+19
to
+21
| const handleTabChange = (event, newTab) => { | ||
| navigate(`/status/${newTab}`); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we are calling this without passing the new tab. I suggest deleting the second parameter, adding a name to the input, and getting the name from the event target, then passing it to to navigate
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, the onChange of TabList has the (event, value) as param/signature, so those were passed on to the handleTabChange
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@shemy-gan Please avoid resolving conversations ahead of time.
HandleTabChange is called on line 46 without the second parameter. I am suggesting removing the second parameter altogether, an deal with that data through the name attribute from the input.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The document/signature of onChange has event and value,
(property) onChange?: ((event: React.SyntheticEvent, value: any) => void) | undefined
Callback fired when the value changes.
so here
the handleTabChange did have the second param
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jennifer-gan I believe the point here is that if we use the name attribute we don't have to use the second parameter.
Similar to the implementation in the refactor of the various create pages I pushed the other day.
Always nice to reduce the number of parameters needed if at all possible
|
I think we can close this pr since we have #1307 right? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Status/GeneralSettingsPanel.jsx (1)
1-8: Yo! Let's organize these imports for better readability, dawg!Consider grouping imports into these categories:
- React core
- Third-party libraries (Material-UI, Redux, Emotion)
- Local components and styles
- import { useState, useRef } from "react"; - import { Box, Stack, Typography } from "@mui/material"; - import { ConfigBox } from "../../../Pages/Uptime/styled"; - import Checkbox from "../../Inputs/Checkbox"; - import { useTheme } from "@emotion/react"; - import { useDispatch, useSelector } from "react-redux"; - import TabPanel from "@mui/lab/TabPanel"; + import { useState, useRef } from "react"; + + import { Box, Stack, Typography } from "@mui/material"; + import TabPanel from "@mui/lab/TabPanel"; + import { useTheme } from "@emotion/react"; + import { useDispatch, useSelector } from "react-redux"; + + import { ConfigBox } from "../../../Pages/Uptime/styled"; + import Checkbox from "../../Inputs/Checkbox";
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Status/GeneralSettingsPanel.jsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Status/GeneralSettingsPanel.jsx (2)
20-24:
Yo! These handlers are emptier than mom's spaghetti bowl!
- Empty handler implementations could lead to runtime issues
- Previous review noted inconsistency in handler naming pattern
Implement the handlers and maintain consistent naming:
- const handleSubmit = () => {};
+ const handleSubmit = (e) => {
+ e.preventDefault();
+ // TODO: Implement form submission
+ };
- const handleChange = () => {};
+ const handleChange = (e) => {
+ const { id, checked } = e.target;
+ setLocalData(prev => ({
+ ...prev,
+ [id]: checked
+ }));
+ };
- const handleBlur = () => {};
+ const handleBlur = (e) => {
+ // TODO: Implement validation on blur
+ };34-58:
Yo! The form's got more issues than a rap battle!
- Previous review noted missing
isCheckedprop on Checkbox - Form lacks proper validation feedback
- Previous review noted checkbox positioning issues
Here's how to fix these issues:
<Stack
component="form"
className="status-general-settings-form"
onSubmit={handleSubmit}
noValidate
spellCheck="false"
gap={theme.spacing(12)}
mt={theme.spacing(6)}
+ sx={{ width: '100%' }}
>
<ConfigBox>
<Box>
<Stack gap={theme.spacing(6)}>
<Typography component="h2">Access</Typography>
<Typography component="p">
If your status page is ready, you can mark it as published.
</Typography>
</Stack>
</Box>
<Checkbox
id="published-to-public"
label={`Published and visible to the public`}
onChange={(e) => handleChange(e)}
onBlur={handleBlur}
+ isChecked={localData.isPublished}
+ error={errors.isPublished}
+ helperText={errors.isPublished}
/>
</ConfigBox>
</Stack>| @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ | |||
| import { useState, useRef } from "react"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo! We got some unused imports and incomplete state setup here!
useRefis imported but not useduseDispatchis imported but not usedlocalDatastate is initialized as an empty object without any properties
- import { useState, useRef } from "react";
+ import { useState } from "react";
- import { useDispatch, useSelector } from "react-redux";
+ import { useSelector } from "react-redux";
const [localData, setLocalData] = useState({
+ isPublished: false,
+ title: "",
+ description: ""
});Also applies to: 6-6, 11-19
| const GeneralSettingsPanel = () => { | ||
| const theme = useTheme(); | ||
| //redux state | ||
| const { user, authToken, isLoading } = useSelector((state) => state.auth); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo! We need to handle loading states, fam!
The component imports isLoading from Redux but doesn't use it to show loading states.
<TabPanel
value="general settings"
sx={{
"& h1, & p, & input": {
color: theme.palette.text.tertiary,
},
+ opacity: isLoading ? 0.5 : 1,
+ pointerEvents: isLoading ? 'none' : 'auto'
}}
>
+ {isLoading && (
+ <Box sx={{ position: 'absolute', top: '50%', left: '50%', transform: 'translate(-50%, -50%)' }}>
+ <CircularProgress />
+ </Box>
+ )}Also applies to: 25-33
|
Closing this PR as there will be major revisions as discussed in the team meeting today |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.