feat: create monitor display name, resovles #992 #1221
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: This PR introduces a feature to automatically generate a display name for a monitor based on the entered URL. The main goal is to enhance user experience by providing more human-readable names for monitors, which can be especially useful when the URL is complex or lengthy.
- Key components modified:
monitorUtils.js: Added a new utility functionparseDomainNameto parse and format the display name from a given URL.CreateMonitorcomponents in various directories: Integrated the new utility function to set the monitor name when the URL field loses focus.
- Impact assessment: The changes impact multiple
CreateMonitorcomponents across different modules (Infrastructure, Monitors, PageSpeed). This ensures consistency in how display names are generated across the application. - System dependencies and integration impacts: The modifications are localized to the frontend and do not introduce new dependencies or significant integration impacts.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: The introduction of the
parseDomainNamefunction inmonitorUtils.jscentralizes the URL parsing logic, promoting reusability and consistency. - Component interactions: The
parseDomainNamefunction is used in multipleCreateMonitorcomponents, ensuring uniform behavior across different parts of the application. - Integration points: The function is integrated into the
handleBlurandonUrlBlurevent handlers in theCreateMonitorcomponents, seamlessly updating the monitor name when the URL field loses focus.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
Client/src/Utils/monitorUtils.js - parseDomainName
- Submitted PR Code:
export const parseDomainName = (url) => { url = url.replace(/^https?:\/\//, ""); url = url.replace(/^\.+|\.+$/g, ""); const parts = url.split("."); const cleanParts = parts.filter((part) => part !== "www" && part !== ""); if (cleanParts.length > 2) { return url; } const domainPart = cleanParts.length > 1 ? cleanParts[cleanParts.length - 2] : cleanParts[cleanParts.length - 1]; if (domainPart) { return domainPart.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + domainPart.slice(1).toLowerCase(); } return url; };
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues:
- The function attempts to parse the domain name from a URL by removing common prefixes and suffixes.
- It handles basic cases but may fail for more complex URLs or subdomains.
- Edge cases like URLs with multiple subdomains or special characters are not fully addressed.
- Edge cases and error handling:
- The function does not handle URLs with paths, query parameters, or fragments.
- It does not validate the URL format, which could lead to incorrect parsing.
- Cross-component impact:
- The function is used across multiple
CreateMonitorcomponents, ensuring consistent behavior.
- The function is used across multiple
- Business logic considerations:
- The display name generation should be intuitive and accurate to avoid user confusion.
- Current logic and potential issues:
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
export const parseDomainName = (url) => { try { const parsedUrl = new URL(url); const hostname = parsedUrl.hostname; const parts = hostname.split('.').filter(part => part !== 'www' && part !== ''); const domainPart = parts.length > 1 ? parts[parts.length - 2] : parts[parts.length - 1]; return domainPart.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + domainPart.slice(1).toLowerCase(); } catch (e) { console.error('Invalid URL:', e); return url; } };
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits:
- Using the
URLobject ensures proper parsing and validation of the URL. - Handles edge cases like paths, query parameters, and fragments.
- Using the
- Business value:
- Provides more accurate and reliable display names, enhancing user experience.
- Risk assessment:
- Low risk as it improves the existing functionality without introducing new dependencies.
- Technical benefits:
- Improvement rationale:
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx - handleBlur
- Submitted PR Code:
const handleBlur = (event, appendID) => { event.preventDefault(); const { value, id } = event.target; let name = idMap[id] ?? id; if (name === "url" && infrastructureMonitor.name === "") { setInfrastructureMonitor((prev) => ({ ...prev, name: parseDomainName(value), })); } if (id?.startsWith("notify-email-")) return; const { error } = infrastructureMonitorValidation.validate( { [id ?? appendID]: value }, { abortEarly: false, } ); setErrors((prev) => { return buildErrors(prev, id ?? appendID, error); }); };
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues:
- The
handleBlurfunction sets the monitor name usingparseDomainNamewhen the URL field loses focus. - It ensures that the monitor name is updated only if it is empty.
- Potential issues include lack of validation for the URL and reliance on the basic
parseDomainNamefunction.
- The
- Edge cases and error handling:
- The function does not handle invalid URLs or edge cases where
parseDomainNamemight fail. - There is no error handling for the
parseDomainNamefunction call.
- The function does not handle invalid URLs or edge cases where
- Cross-component impact:
- The logic is consistent with other
CreateMonitorcomponents, ensuring uniform behavior.
- The logic is consistent with other
- Business logic considerations:
- The automatic setting of the monitor name should be reliable to avoid user confusion.
- Current logic and potential issues:
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const handleBlur = (event, appendID) => { event.preventDefault(); const { value, id } = event.target; let name = idMap[id] ?? id; if (name === "url" && infrastructureMonitor.name === "") { const parsedName = parseDomainName(value); if (parsedName !== value) { setInfrastructureMonitor((prev) => ({ ...prev, name: parsedName, })); } } if (id?.startsWith("notify-email-")) return; const { error } = infrastructureMonitorValidation.validate( { [id ?? appendID]: value }, { abortEarly: false, } ); setErrors((prev) => { return buildErrors(prev, id ?? appendID, error); }); };
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits:
- Adds a check to ensure that the parsed name is different from the original URL before updating the state.
- Prevents unnecessary state updates.
- Business value:
- Ensures that the monitor name is only updated when a valid and different name is parsed, improving reliability.
- Risk assessment:
- Low risk as it enhances the existing logic without introducing new dependencies.
- Technical benefits:
- Improvement rationale:
Client/src/Pages/Monitors/CreateMonitor/index.jsx - onUrlBlur
- Submitted PR Code:
const onUrlBlur = (event) => { const { value } = event.target; if (monitor.name === "") { setMonitor((prev) => ({ ...prev, name: parseDomainName(value), })); } };
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues:
- The
onUrlBlurfunction sets the monitor name usingparseDomainNamewhen the URL field loses focus. - It ensures that the monitor name is updated only if it is empty.
- Potential issues include lack of validation for the URL and reliance on the basic
parseDomainNamefunction.
- The
- Edge cases and error handling:
- The function does not handle invalid URLs or edge cases where
parseDomainNamemight fail. - There is no error handling for the
parseDomainNamefunction call.
- The function does not handle invalid URLs or edge cases where
- Cross-component impact:
- The logic is consistent with other
CreateMonitorcomponents, ensuring uniform behavior.
- The logic is consistent with other
- Business logic considerations:
- The automatic setting of the monitor name should be reliable to avoid user confusion.
- Current logic and potential issues:
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const onUrlBlur = (event) => { const { value } = event.target; if (monitor.name === "") { const parsedName = parseDomainName(value); if (parsedName !== value) { setMonitor((prev) => ({ ...prev, name: parsedName, })); } } };
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits:
- Adds a check to ensure that the parsed name is different from the original URL before updating the state.
- Prevents unnecessary state updates.
- Business value:
- Ensures that the monitor name is only updated when a valid and different name is parsed, improving reliability.
- Risk assessment:
- Low risk as it enhances the existing logic without introducing new dependencies.
- Technical benefits:
- Improvement rationale:
Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/CreatePageSpeed/index.jsx - onUrlBlur
- Submitted PR Code:
const onUrlBlur = (event) => { const { value } = event.target; if (monitor.name === "") { setMonitor((prev) => ({ ...prev, name: parseDomainName(value), })); } };
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues:
- The
onUrlBlurfunction sets the monitor name usingparseDomainNamewhen the URL field loses focus. - It ensures that the monitor name is updated only if it is empty.
- Potential issues include lack of validation for the URL and reliance on the basic
parseDomainNamefunction.
- The
- Edge cases and error handling:
- The function does not handle invalid URLs or edge cases where
parseDomainNamemight fail. - There is no error handling for the
parseDomainNamefunction call.
- The function does not handle invalid URLs or edge cases where
- Cross-component impact:
- The logic is consistent with other
CreateMonitorcomponents, ensuring uniform behavior.
- The logic is consistent with other
- Business logic considerations:
- The automatic setting of the monitor name should be reliable to avoid user confusion.
- Current logic and potential issues:
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const onUrlBlur = (event) => { const { value } = event.target; if (monitor.name === "") { const parsedName = parseDomainName(value); if (parsedName !== value) { setMonitor((prev) => ({ ...prev, name: parsedName, })); } } };
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits:
- Adds a check to ensure that the parsed name is different from the original URL before updating the state.
- Prevents unnecessary state updates.
- Business value:
- Ensures that the monitor name is only updated when a valid and different name is parsed, improving reliability.
- Risk assessment:
- Low risk as it enhances the existing logic without introducing new dependencies.
- Technical benefits:
- Improvement rationale:
Cross-cutting Concerns
- Data flow analysis:
- The data flow from URL input to display name generation is consistent across components.
- The
parseDomainNamefunction is the central point for URL parsing, ensuring uniform behavior.
- State management implications:
- The state updates are localized to the components where the URL field loses focus, preventing unnecessary state changes.
- Error propagation paths:
- Errors in URL parsing are currently not propagated, which could lead to incorrect display names.
- The suggested improvements include error handling to mitigate this risk.
- Edge case handling across components:
- The current implementation handles basic edge cases but lacks robust validation and error handling.
- The suggested improvements address these gaps, ensuring more reliable display name generation.
Algorithm & Data Structure Analysis
- Complexity analysis:
- The
parseDomainNamefunction has a time complexity of O(n), where n is the length of the URL string. - The function is efficient for typical URL lengths.
- The
- Performance implications:
- The function is lightweight and should not have a significant impact on performance.
- The use of the
URLobject in the suggested improvements optimizes URL parsing.
- Memory usage considerations:
- The function operates on strings and arrays, which are efficient in terms of memory usage.
- No significant memory overhead is introduced by the changes.
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure:
- The new utility function
parseDomainNameis well-encapsulated inmonitorUtils.js, promoting reusability and modularity. - The integration of the function in
CreateMonitorcomponents is consistent and straightforward.
- The new utility function
- Design patterns usage:
- The function follows a straightforward design pattern for string manipulation, which is easy to understand and maintain.
- The suggested improvements leverage the
URLobject, adhering to best practices for URL parsing.
- Error handling approach:
- The current implementation lacks robust error handling, especially for invalid URLs.
- The suggested improvements include a try-catch block to handle invalid URLs gracefully.
- Resource management:
- The function is lightweight and does not introduce significant resource overhead.
- The suggested improvements optimize URL parsing, ensuring efficient resource management.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
🔴 Critical Issues
- Issue description: Lack of robust error handling in
parseDomainName. - Impact:
- Technical implications: May result in incorrect display names for invalid URLs.
- Business consequences: Users may be confused by incorrect or misleading display names.
- User experience effects: Negative impact on user trust and satisfaction.
- Recommendation: Implement try-catch block and URL validation as suggested.
- Issue description: Lack of robust error handling in
-
🟡 Warnings
- Issue description: Inconsistent handling of URLs with paths, query parameters, or fragments.
- Potential risks: Increased maintenance due to potential bugs from unhandled edge cases.
- Suggested improvements: Use the
URLobject for parsing as suggested.
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects:
- The code is simple and well-documented, making it easy to maintain.
- The suggested improvements enhance error handling and logging, aiding in maintenance.
- Readability issues:
- The current implementation is readable but can be improved with better error handling.
- The suggested improvements include clear error messages and logging, enhancing readability.
- Performance bottlenecks:
- No apparent performance bottlenecks in the current implementation.
- The suggested improvements optimize URL parsing, ensuring efficient performance.
4. Security Assessment
- Authentication/Authorization impacts:
- No apparent impacts on authentication or authorization.
- Data handling concerns:
- The function handles URLs, which are not sensitive data.
- Ensure that URLs are properly validated to prevent injection attacks.
- Input validation:
- The suggested improvements include using the
URLobject, which validates the URL format.
- The suggested improvements include using the
- Security best practices:
- Follow best practices for input validation and error handling.
- Potential security risks:
- Lack of robust error handling and input validation in the current implementation.
- Mitigation strategies:
- Implement the suggested improvements to enhance error handling and input validation.
- Security testing requirements:
- Add unit tests for invalid URLs and edge cases to ensure robust security.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis:
- Test the
parseDomainNamefunction with valid and invalid URLs. - Test edge cases like URLs with paths, query parameters, and fragments.
- Test the
- Integration test requirements:
- Test the integration of
parseDomainNameinCreateMonitorcomponents.
- Test the integration of
- Edge cases coverage:
- Validate the handling of various URL formats and edge cases.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Unit test for parseDomainName
test('parseDomainName should handle valid URLs', () => {
expect(parseDomainName('https://www.google.com')).toBe('Google');
expect(parseDomainName('http://test.google.com')).toBe('Google');
expect(parseDomainName('123.123.123')).toBe('123.123.123');
});
test('parseDomainName should handle invalid URLs', () => {
expect(parseDomainName('invalid-url')).toBe('invalid-url');
expect(parseDomainName('ftp://example.com')).toBe('ftp://example.com');
});
test('parseDomainName should handle edge cases', () => {
expect(parseDomainName('www.google')).toBe('Google');
expect(parseDomainName('www.google.')).toBe('Google');
expect(parseDomainName('.www.google.com')).toBe('Google');
});- Coverage improvements:
- Ensure comprehensive unit tests for various URL formats and edge cases.
- Performance testing needs:
- Ensure that the function performs well with a large number of URLs.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation updates needed:
- Update the documentation to reflect the new
parseDomainNamefunction and its usage inCreateMonitorcomponents. - Include examples of valid and invalid URLs and the expected display names.
- Update the documentation to reflect the new
- Long-term maintenance considerations:
- The suggested improvements enhance error handling and logging, aiding in long-term maintenance.
- Ensure that the function is well-documented and tested to facilitate future updates.
- Technical debt and monitoring requirements:
- The current implementation introduces minimal technical debt.
- Monitor the function's performance and accuracy in production to identify any edge cases or issues.
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment impact and strategy:
- The changes are localized to the frontend and do not require significant deployment changes.
- Ensure that the new functionality is thoroughly tested before deployment.
- Key operational considerations:
- Monitor the display name generation in production to ensure accuracy and reliability.
- Be prepared to handle any edge cases or issues that arise post-deployment.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
-
Critical changes required:
- Implement robust error handling in
parseDomainNameusing the suggested try-catch block and URL validation.
- Implement robust error handling in
-
Important improvements suggested:
- Update
parseDomainNameto handle URLs with paths, query parameters, and fragments using theURLobject.
- Update
-
Best practices to implement:
- Follow best practices for input validation and error handling.
-
Cross-cutting concerns to address:
- Ensure consistent and reliable display name generation across all
CreateMonitorcomponents.
- Ensure consistent and reliable display name generation across all
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path:
- Continuously improve the
parseDomainNamefunction to handle more complex URLs and edge cases. - Consider using third-party libraries for advanced URL parsing if needed.
- Continuously improve the
- Business capability evolution:
- Enhance the user experience by providing more intuitive and accurate display names.
- Explore additional features that leverage the parsed domain names, such as automated tagging or categorization.
- System integration impacts:
- Ensure that the display name generation logic is consistent across all integrated systems and components.
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new utility function, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
Client/src/Utils/monitorUtils.js (3)
19-19: Add JSDoc documentation for better maintainabilityYo! Let's drop some documentation here to help future developers understand what's going on.
+/** + * Extracts and formats a display name from a URL + * @param {string} url - The URL to parse + * @returns {string} Formatted domain name or original URL if parsing fails + * @example + * parseDomainName("www.google.com") // returns "Google" + * parseDomainName("123.123.123") // returns "123.123.123" + */ export const parseDomainName = (url) => {
26-30: Enhance domain parsing logicThere's vomit on his sweater already... and it might be from these edge cases! Let's handle them better.
- const cleanParts = parts.filter((part) => part !== "www" && part !== ""); - if (cleanParts.length > 2) { - // Don't know how to parse this, return URL - return url; - } + const cleanParts = parts.filter((part) => part !== "www" && part !== ""); + // Known TLDs that should be handled specially + const knownTLDs = ['co.uk', 'com.au', 'co.jp']; + for (const tld of knownTLDs) { + if (url.endsWith(tld)) { + const domainPart = cleanParts[cleanParts.length - 3]; + return domainPart ? formatDomainName(domainPart) : url; + } + } + return cleanParts.length > 2 ? url : cleanParts[cleanParts.length - 2] || url;
37-39: Extract formatting logic to a separate functionArms are heavy from all this inline formatting! Let's make it more modular.
+ const formatDomainName = (domain) => { + return domain.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + domain.slice(1).toLowerCase(); + }; + if (domainPart) { - return domainPart.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + domainPart.slice(1).toLowerCase(); + return formatDomainName(domainPart); }Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/CreatePageSpeed/index.jsx (2)
227-227: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's improve the UX! 🍝Consider adding a loading state while the domain is being parsed and visual feedback when the name is automatically set.
onBlur={onUrlBlur} +onFocus={() => setMonitor(prev => ({ ...prev, name: "" }))} +helperText={monitor.name ? "Name automatically set from URL" : ""}
Line range hint
47-67: Knees weak, arms heavy: Let's clean up this notification logic! 🍝The notification handling logic is a bit complex and contains a TODO for phone notifications. Consider these improvements:
- Extract notification logic to a separate function
- Use a more declarative approach
Here's a cleaner version:
-if (name.includes("notification-")) { +const updateNotifications = (type, value) => { + setMonitor((prev) => { + const notifications = prev.notifications.filter(n => n.type !== type); + return value ? { + ...prev, + notifications: [...notifications, { type, [type === 'email' ? 'address' : 'phone']: value }] + } : { + ...prev, + notifications + }; + }); +}; +if (name.includes("notification-")) { name = name.replace("notification-", ""); - let hasNotif = monitor.notifications.some( - (notification) => notification.type === name - ); - setMonitor((prev) => { - const notifs = [...prev.notifications]; - if (hasNotif) { - return { - ...prev, - notifications: notifs.filter((notif) => notif.type !== name), - }; - } else { - return { - ...prev, - notifications: [ - ...notifs, - name === "email" - ? { type: name, address: value } - : // TODO - phone number - { type: name, phone: value }, - ], - }; - } - }); + updateNotifications(name, value);Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the phone notification implementation?
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx (1)
84-91: Clarify name field population behaviorYo! There's potential confusion in how the monitor name gets set:
- It auto-populates on URL blur if empty
- It falls back to URL when submitting if still empty
- Users might not expect their manually cleared names to be auto-populated
Consider:
- Adding a visual indicator when name is auto-populated
- Adding a tooltip explaining this behavior
Would you like me to propose a UI component implementation for this?
Also applies to: 180-184
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Monitors/CreateMonitor/index.jsx(4 hunks)Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/CreatePageSpeed/index.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Utils/monitorUtils.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
Client/src/Utils/monitorUtils.js (1)
19-42: Verify the impact on existing monitor names
Palms are sweaty thinking about existing monitors! Let's verify the impact.
✅ Verification successful
Yo, we're good to go with the domain parsing changes!
After sweating through the codebase like Eminem before a rap battle, I can confirm this is safe. Here's why:
- The
parseDomainNamefunction is only used for display/UI purposes to extract readable names from URLs - Monitor creation and storage always use the full, original URL:
- Server validates and stores complete URLs through
createMonitorBodyValidation - All monitor tests use full URLs like "https://www.google.com"
- The demo monitors in
demoMonitors.jsonall use complete URLs
- Server validates and stores complete URLs through
- No database queries or monitoring logic depends on the parsed domain name
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for existing monitor URLs to verify parsing impact
rg -l 'createMonitor.*url:' | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg 'createMonitor.*url:\s*["\']([^"\']+)["\']' "$file" -o -r '$1'
done
Length of output: 250
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find monitor creation patterns
echo "=== Searching for monitor creation patterns ==="
rg "createMonitor.*url.*" -A 2
# Also check for any test files that might have example URLs
echo -e "\n=== Searching for test files with URLs ==="
fd -e test.js -e spec.js -X rg "url.*http"
# Look for any configuration files that might contain monitor URLs
echo -e "\n=== Searching for config files with URLs ==="
rg "url.*http" -g "*.{json,config,yml,yaml}"
Length of output: 47227
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look for actual monitor creation in the codebase
echo "=== Searching for monitor creation patterns in source files ==="
rg -g "!{*.json,*.lock}" "createMonitor" -B 2 -A 2
# Also check for any monitor-related tests that might show URL handling
echo -e "\n=== Searching for monitor URL tests ==="
rg -g "*.test.js" "parseDomainName|test.*url" -B 1 -A 1
Length of output: 15064
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx (1)
6-6: LGTM! Import statement is well-placed
The import of parseDomainName is appropriately grouped with other utility imports.
Client/src/Pages/Monitors/CreateMonitor/index.jsx (3)
20-20: Yo, the import looks clean!
The import statement for parseDomainName is properly organized with other utility imports. Keep it rollin'!
94-94: Straight fire! Dependencies are on point! 🔥
Added dispatch and navigate to the dependency array - that's the way it should be! Keeps those React hooks linting rules happy and prevents stale closure bugs.
271-271: Mom's spaghetti... I mean, this integration's ready! 🍝
The onBlur handler is properly wired up to the URL field. Clean integration!
Comment on lines
+19
to
+20
| export const parseDomainName = (url) => { | ||
| url = url.replace(/^https?:\/\//, ""); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add input validation to prevent runtime errors
Mom's spaghetti won't save us from those runtime errors! We need some input validation.
export const parseDomainName = (url) => {
+ if (!url || typeof url !== 'string') {
+ return '';
+ }
url = url.replace(/^https?:\/\//, "");📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| export const parseDomainName = (url) => { | |
| url = url.replace(/^https?:\/\//, ""); | |
| export const parseDomainName = (url) => { | |
| if (!url || typeof url !== 'string') { | |
| return ''; | |
| } | |
| url = url.replace(/^https?:\/\//, ""); |
Comment on lines
+20
to
+22
| url = url.replace(/^https?:\/\//, ""); | ||
| // Remove leading/trailing dots | ||
| url = url.replace(/^\.+|\.+$/g, ""); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using URL API for safer parsing
Knees weak from all these regex! The built-in URL API might be safer for URL parsing.
- url = url.replace(/^https?:\/\//, "");
- // Remove leading/trailing dots
- url = url.replace(/^\.+|\.+$/g, "");
+ try {
+ const urlObj = new URL(url.startsWith('http') ? url : `https://${url}`);
+ url = urlObj.hostname;
+ } catch {
+ // If URL parsing fails, continue with original string
+ url = url.replace(/^https?:\/\//, "").replace(/^\.+|\.+$/g, "");
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| url = url.replace(/^https?:\/\//, ""); | |
| // Remove leading/trailing dots | |
| url = url.replace(/^\.+|\.+$/g, ""); | |
| try { | |
| const urlObj = new URL(url.startsWith('http') ? url : `https://${url}`); | |
| url = urlObj.hostname; | |
| } catch { | |
| // If URL parsing fails, continue with original string | |
| url = url.replace(/^https?:\/\//, "").replace(/^\.+|\.+$/g, ""); | |
| } |
Comment on lines
+98
to
+106
| const onUrlBlur = (event) => { | ||
| const { value } = event.target; | ||
| if (monitor.name === "") { | ||
| setMonitor((prev) => ({ | ||
| ...prev, | ||
| name: parseDomainName(value), | ||
| })); | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo dawg, let's make this function bulletproof! 🍝
The function needs some defensive programming to handle edge cases. Consider these improvements:
- Validate URL before parsing
- Add error handling
- Optimize state updates
Here's a more robust version:
const onUrlBlur = (event) => {
const { value } = event.target;
- if (monitor.name === "") {
+ if (!monitor.name.trim() && value) {
+ try {
setMonitor((prev) => ({
...prev,
name: parseDomainName(value),
}));
+ } catch (error) {
+ logger.warn(`Failed to parse domain name: ${error.message}`);
+ // Fallback to original URL if parsing fails
+ setMonitor((prev) => ({
+ ...prev,
+ name: value,
+ }));
+ }
}
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Comment on lines
+84
to
+91
|
|
||
| let name = idMap[id] ?? id; | ||
| if (name === "url" && infrastructureMonitor.name === "") { | ||
| setInfrastructureMonitor((prev) => ({ | ||
| ...prev, | ||
| name: parseDomainName(value), | ||
| })); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add URL validation before setting the monitor name
Yo! The current implementation might set invalid names from malformed URLs. Consider these improvements:
- Validate URL format before parsing
- Handle potential errors from parseDomainName
- Consider the error state before setting the name
Here's a suggested improvement:
let name = idMap[id] ?? id;
if (name === "url" && infrastructureMonitor.name === "") {
+ try {
+ // Basic URL validation
+ new URL(value);
+ if (!errors["url"]) {
setInfrastructureMonitor((prev) => ({
...prev,
name: parseDomainName(value),
}));
+ }
+ } catch (e) {
+ // URL is invalid, skip setting the name
+ return;
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| let name = idMap[id] ?? id; | |
| if (name === "url" && infrastructureMonitor.name === "") { | |
| setInfrastructureMonitor((prev) => ({ | |
| ...prev, | |
| name: parseDomainName(value), | |
| })); | |
| } | |
| let name = idMap[id] ?? id; | |
| if (name === "url" && infrastructureMonitor.name === "") { | |
| try { | |
| // Basic URL validation | |
| new URL(value); | |
| if (!errors["url"]) { | |
| setInfrastructureMonitor((prev) => ({ | |
| ...prev, | |
| name: parseDomainName(value), | |
| })); | |
| } | |
| } catch (e) { | |
| // URL is invalid, skip setting the name | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| } |
Comment on lines
+144
to
+152
| const onUrlBlur = (event) => { | ||
| const { value } = event.target; | ||
| if (monitor.name === "") { | ||
| setMonitor((prev) => ({ | ||
| ...prev, | ||
| name: parseDomainName(value), | ||
| })); | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo, we need some error handling in this beat! 🎵
The onUrlBlur function's got the right flow, but it's missing some error handling sauce. What if parseDomainName throws? We gotta catch that!
Here's a safer version with error handling:
const onUrlBlur = (event) => {
const { value } = event.target;
if (monitor.name === "") {
+ try {
setMonitor((prev) => ({
...prev,
name: parseDomainName(value),
}));
+ } catch (error) {
+ logger.error('Failed to parse domain name:', error);
+ createToast({
+ body: "Couldn't generate a display name from URL. Please enter one manually."
+ });
+ }
}
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
This was referenced Nov 28, 2024
This was referenced Dec 3, 2024
This was referenced Dec 3, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR implements adding a name to a monitor when a URL is entered
Parsing a domain from a URL is non-trivial, so this is a pretty simple version. It tries to figure out what the domain is, and if it can't, it just returns the original URL.
www.google.com -> Google
www.test.google.com -> www.test.google.com
123.123.123 -> 123.123.123
www.google -> Google
www.google. -> Google
.www.google.com -> Google
...google.com... -> Google
There are many edge cases, so if anyone wants to spend time coming up with a better algorithm by all means, please do 😂