Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update babel-eslint to the latest version 🚀 #15

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2018

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Sep 25, 2018

The devDependency babel-eslint was updated from 9.0.0 to 10.0.0.

This version is not covered by your current version range.

If you don’t accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.


Release Notes for v10.0.0

v10.0.0

Small breaking change: add a peerDependency starting from the ESLint version that added a parser feature that we were monkeypatching before (and drop that code). If already using ESLint 5 shouldn't be any different.

  • Bugfix for TypeAlias: #584
/* @flow */
type Node<T> = { head: T; tail: Node<T> }

// or

type File = {chunks: Array<Chunk>}
type Chunk = {file: File}

  • Update to test against ESLint 5, add a peerDependency: #689
  • Drop monkeypatching behavior: #690
Commits

The new version differs by 5 commits.

  • 8f78e28 10.0.0
  • 717fba7 test value should be switched
  • 020d012 Treat type alias declarationlike function declaration (#584)
  • b400cb1 Test eslint5, update peerDep (#690)
  • c333bd6 Drop old monkeypatching behavior (#689)

See the full diff

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper bot 🌴

@kremalicious kremalicious merged commit 80942cc into master Sep 26, 2018
@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot deleted the greenkeeper/babel-eslint-10.0.0 branch September 26, 2018 08:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant