[Merged by Bors] - Add system sets and run criteria example #1909
Conversation
mockersf
added
A-ECS
|
I think I'm CI blocked until this is in: #1906 |
examples/ecs/system_sets.rs
Outdated
| // This shows that we can modify existing run criteria results. | ||
| // Here we create a _not done_ criteria by piping the output of | ||
| // the `done` system and inverting the output. | ||
| .with_run_criteria(RunCriteria::pipe("done", inverse.system())), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The "done" string realy confused me here, as i thought it was somehow finding the correct function through a string alone. After reading further I realised that this string is actualy a label.
To reduce this confusion, I suggest to use another Type that derives SystemLabel instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I varied names slightly to differentiate better.
I wanted to have an example of using the string literal for creating a SystemLabel since my intuition says there are probably users who would like to uses labels but not create extra types for it.
Hopefully the new names and added comment makes things clearer.
Signed-off-by: Torstein Grindvik <[email protected]>
…sition calls Signed-off-by: Torstein Grindvik <[email protected]>
examples/ecs/system_sets.rs
Outdated
| .label(PostPhysics) | ||
| // `collision` and `sfx` are not ordered with respect to | ||
| // each other, and may run in any order | ||
| .with_system(collision.system()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Small nit: I like to define systems last in system sets as a general pattern. This creates a nice SetConfig -> Systems order.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok! I'm all for consistency. Updated.
examples/ecs/system_sets.rs
Outdated
| @@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ fn main() { | |||
| App::build() | |||
| .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) | |||
| .init_resource::<Done>() | |||
| // Note that the system sets added in this example sets their run criteria explicitly. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: "Note that the system sets added in this example set their run criteria explicitly."
* Typo: sets -> set * Reorder system sets to add systems last Signed-off-by: Torstein Grindvik <[email protected]>
Yes the pipe usage was a bit shoehorned in. |
|
bors r+ |
If accepted, fixes #1694 . I wanted to explore system sets and run criteria a bit, so made an example expanding a bit on the snippets shown in the 0.5 release post. Shows a couple of system sets, uses system labels, run criterion, and a use of the interesting `RunCriterion::pipe` functionality.
|
Pull request successfully merged into main. Build succeeded: |
bors
bot
changed the title
If accepted, fixes bevyengine#1694 . I wanted to explore system sets and run criteria a bit, so made an example expanding a bit on the snippets shown in the 0.5 release post. Shows a couple of system sets, uses system labels, run criterion, and a use of the interesting `RunCriterion::pipe` functionality.
If accepted, fixes #1694 .
I wanted to explore system sets and run criteria a bit, so made an example expanding a bit on the snippets shown in the 0.5 release post.
Shows a couple of system sets, uses system labels, run criterion, and a use of the interesting
RunCriterion::pipefunctionality.