Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tour of Beam: formatting/typos #33249

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

thread-sleep
Copy link
Contributor

Fix some minor formatting, typos, and data types in the Tour of Beam descriptions.

Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

Copy link
Contributor

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @kennknowles added as fallback since no labels match configuration

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

```
{{end}}
{{if (eq .Sdk "python")}}
While all SDKs have a GroupByKey transform, using GroupBy is generally more natural. The `GroupBy` transform can be parameterized by the name(s) of properties on which to group the elements of the PCollection, or a function taking the each element as input that maps to a key on which to do grouping.
While all SDKs have a `GroupByKey` transform, using `GroupB`y is generally more natural. The `GroupBy` transform can be parameterized by the name(s) of properties on which to group the elements of the PCollection, or a function taking the each element as input that maps to a key on which to do grouping.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

still a typo here


### Playground exercise

You can find the complete code of the above example using 'Filter' in the playground window, which you can run and experiment with.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see this is duplicate. Thanks for catching this.

Copy link
Contributor

@Abacn Abacn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! Just had one minor comment

@Abacn Abacn merged commit 697a843 into apache:master Dec 3, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants