-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RRIO] [Call] Create CallShouldBackoff and default implementation #28952
Conversation
assign set of reviewers |
Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment R: @Abacn for label java. Available commands:
The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments). |
Run Java PreCommit |
Run Spotless PreCommit |
Run Java PreCommit |
R: @chamikaramj |
Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks.
.../java/org/apache/beam/io/requestresponseio/CallShouldBackoffBasedOnRejectionProbability.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../java/org/apache/beam/io/requestresponseio/CallShouldBackoffBasedOnRejectionProbability.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../java/org/apache/beam/io/requestresponseio/CallShouldBackoffBasedOnRejectionProbability.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../java/org/apache/beam/io/requestresponseio/CallShouldBackoffBasedOnRejectionProbability.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../java/org/apache/beam/io/requestresponseio/CallShouldBackoffBasedOnRejectionProbability.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../java/org/apache/beam/io/requestresponseio/CallShouldBackoffBasedOnRejectionProbability.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...a/org/apache/beam/io/requestresponseio/CallShouldBackoffBasedOnRejectionProbabilityTest.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. LGTM.
This PR fixes #28936 by defining the interface and default implementation based on https://sre.google/sre-book/handling-overload/.
Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
addresses #123
), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>
instead.CHANGES.md
with noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.