Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding watermark support to DebeziumIO transform #24757

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 18, 2023

Conversation

pabloem
Copy link
Member

@pabloem pabloem commented Dec 21, 2022

We had no watermark support before, which is a serious problem : /


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI.

@pabloem
Copy link
Member Author

pabloem commented Dec 21, 2022

r: @chamikaramj

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control

@pabloem
Copy link
Member Author

pabloem commented Dec 21, 2022

r: @chamikaramj would you be ablet o help out? : )

Copy link
Contributor

@johnjcasey johnjcasey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, there is one more test we could add

@@ -78,6 +79,18 @@ public static Schema.FieldType beamSchemaTypeFromKafkaType(
}
}

public static Instant debeziumRecordInstant(SourceRecord record) {
if (!record.valueSchema().type().equals(org.apache.kafka.connect.data.Schema.Type.STRUCT)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add a test to verify this behavior as well?

@pabloem
Copy link
Member Author

pabloem commented Jan 11, 2023

thanks for the review @johnjcasey ! I've added the test. Can you take a look please? : )

@pabloem
Copy link
Member Author

pabloem commented Jan 11, 2023

broken suite is unrelated : )

@pabloem
Copy link
Member Author

pabloem commented Jan 13, 2023

ptal : D

@pabloem
Copy link
Member Author

pabloem commented Jan 18, 2023

@johnjcasey ptal : )

@pabloem pabloem requested a review from johnjcasey January 18, 2023 06:03
@johnjcasey
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@johnjcasey johnjcasey merged commit d69dbd8 into apache:master Jan 18, 2023
@pabloem pabloem deleted the debezium-watermarks branch January 18, 2023 17:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants