Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 28, 2021. It is now read-only.

myphone source code #2

Open
aixlinux opened this issue Jul 20, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

myphone source code #2

aixlinux opened this issue Jul 20, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@aixlinux
Copy link

No description provided.

nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2020
@gregkh
tools lib traceevent: Fix memory leak in process_dynamic_array_len
a710335 
[ Upstream commit e24c6447ccb7b1a01f9bf0aec94939e6450c0b4d ]

I compiled with AddressSanitizer and I had these memory leaks while I
was using the tep_parse_format function:

    Direct leak of 28 byte(s) in 4 object(s) allocated from:
        #0 0x7fb07db49ffe in __interceptor_realloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10dffe)
        #1 0x7fb07a724228 in extend_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:985
        #2 0x7fb07a724c21 in __read_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1140
        #3 0x7fb07a724f78 in read_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1206
        #4 0x7fb07a725191 in __read_expect_type /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1291
        #5 0x7fb07a7251df in read_expect_type /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1299
        #6 0x7fb07a72e6c8 in process_dynamic_array_len /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:2849
        #7 0x7fb07a7304b8 in process_function /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3161
        #8 0x7fb07a730900 in process_arg_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3207
        #9 0x7fb07a727c0b in process_arg /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1786
        #10 0x7fb07a731080 in event_read_print_args /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3285
        #11 0x7fb07a731722 in event_read_print /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3369
        #12 0x7fb07a740054 in __tep_parse_format /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:6335
        #13 0x7fb07a74047a in __parse_event /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:6389
        #14 0x7fb07a740536 in tep_parse_format /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:6431
        #15 0x7fb07a785acf in parse_event ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:251
        #16 0x7fb07a785ccd in parse_systems ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:284
        #17 0x7fb07a786fb3 in read_metadata ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:593
        #18 0x7fb07a78760e in ftrace_fs_source_init ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:727
        #19 0x7fb07d90c19c in add_component_with_init_method_data ../../../../src/lib/graph/graph.c:1048
        #20 0x7fb07d90c87b in add_source_component_with_initialize_method_data ../../../../src/lib/graph/graph.c:1127
        #21 0x7fb07d90c92a in bt_graph_add_source_component ../../../../src/lib/graph/graph.c:1152
        #22 0x55db11aa632e in cmd_run_ctx_create_components_from_config_components ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2252
        #23 0x55db11aa6fda in cmd_run_ctx_create_components ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2347
        #24 0x55db11aa780c in cmd_run ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2461
        #25 0x55db11aa8a7d in main ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2673
        #26 0x7fb07d5460b2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x270b2)

The token variable in the process_dynamic_array_len function is
allocated in the read_expect_type function, but is not freed before
calling the read_token function.

Free the token variable before calling read_token in order to plug the
leak.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Duplessis-Guindon <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-devel/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2020
@dinghaoliu @gregkh
ALSA: echoaudio: Fix potential Oops in snd_echo_resume()
ca95679 
[ Upstream commit 5a25de6df789cc805a9b8ba7ab5deef5067af47e ]

Freeing chip on error may lead to an Oops at the next time
the system goes to resume. Fix this by removing all
snd_echo_free() calls on error.

Fixes: 47b5d02 ("ALSA: Echoaudio - Add suspend support #2")
Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2020
@sergey-senozhatsky @gregkh
serial: 8250: change lock order in serial8250_do_startup()
673d5fb 
commit 205d300aea75623e1ae4aa43e0d265ab9cf195fd upstream.

We have a number of "uart.port->desc.lock vs desc.lock->uart.port"
lockdep reports coming from 8250 driver; this causes a bit of trouble
to people, so let's fix it.

The problem is reverse lock order in two different call paths:

chain #1:

 serial8250_do_startup()
  spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock);
   disable_irq_nosync(port->irq);
    raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock)

chain #2:

  __report_bad_irq()
   raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock)
    for_each_action_of_desc()
     printk()
      spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock);

Fix this by changing the order of locks in serial8250_do_startup():
 do disable_irq_nosync() first, which grabs desc->lock, and grab
 uart->port after that, so that chain #1 and chain #2 have same lock
 order.

Full lockdep splat:

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 5.4.39 #55 Not tainted
 ======================================================

 swapper/0/0 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffffffffab65b6c0 (console_owner){-...}, at: console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}:
        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d
        __irq_get_desc_lock+0x65/0x89
        __disable_irq_nosync+0x3b/0x93
        serial8250_do_startup+0x451/0x75c
        uart_startup+0x1b4/0x2ff
        uart_port_activate+0x73/0xa0
        tty_port_open+0xae/0x10a
        uart_open+0x1b/0x26
        tty_open+0x24d/0x3a0
        chrdev_open+0xd5/0x1cc
        do_dentry_open+0x299/0x3c8
        path_openat+0x434/0x1100
        do_filp_open+0x9b/0x10a
        do_sys_open+0x15f/0x3d7
        kernel_init_freeable+0x157/0x1dd
        kernel_init+0xe/0x105
        ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}:
        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d
        serial8250_console_write+0xa7/0x2a0
        console_unlock+0x3b7/0x528
        vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f
        printk+0x59/0x73
        register_console+0x336/0x3a4
        uart_add_one_port+0x51b/0x5be
        serial8250_register_8250_port+0x454/0x55e
        dw8250_probe+0x4dc/0x5b9
        platform_drv_probe+0x67/0x8b
        really_probe+0x14a/0x422
        driver_probe_device+0x66/0x130
        device_driver_attach+0x42/0x5b
        __driver_attach+0xca/0x139
        bus_for_each_dev+0x97/0xc9
        bus_add_driver+0x12b/0x228
        driver_register+0x64/0xed
        do_one_initcall+0x20c/0x4a6
        do_initcall_level+0xb5/0xc5
        do_basic_setup+0x4c/0x58
        kernel_init_freeable+0x13f/0x1dd
        kernel_init+0xe/0x105
        ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 -> #0 (console_owner){-...}:
        __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714
        lock_acquire+0x203/0x258
        console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57
        console_unlock+0x25d/0x528
        vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f
        printk+0x59/0x73
        __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba
        note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6
        handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79
        handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55
        handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a
        do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157
        ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d
        cpuidle_enter_state+0x12f/0x1fd
        cpuidle_enter+0x2e/0x3d
        do_idle+0x1ce/0x2ce
        cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x1f
        start_kernel+0x406/0x46a
        secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> &irq_desc_lock_class

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
                                lock(&port_lock_key);
                                lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
   lock(console_owner);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 2 locks held by swapper/0/0:
  #0: ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba
  #1: ffffffffab65b5c0 (console_lock){+.+.}, at: console_trylock_spinning+0x20/0x181

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.4.39 #55
 Hardware name: XXXXXX
 Call Trace:
  <IRQ>
  dump_stack+0xbf/0x133
  ? print_circular_bug+0xd6/0xe9
  check_noncircular+0x1b9/0x1c3
  __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714
  lock_acquire+0x203/0x258
  ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57
  console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57
  ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57
  console_unlock+0x25d/0x528
  ? console_trylock+0x18/0x4e
  vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f
  ? lock_acquire+0x203/0x258
  printk+0x59/0x73
  __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba
  note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6
  handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79
  handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55
  handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a
  do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157
  common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
  </IRQ>

Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]>
Fixes: 768aec0 ("serial: 8250: fix shared interrupts issues with SMP and RT kernels")
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Raul Rangel <[email protected]>
BugLink: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1114800
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHQZ30BnfX+gxjPm1DUd5psOTqbyDh4EJE=2=VAMW_VDafctkA@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Cc: stable <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2020
@josefbacik @gregkh
btrfs: fix potential deadlock in the search ioctl
52245f0 
[ Upstream commit a48b73eca4ceb9b8a4b97f290a065335dbcd8a04 ]

With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following
lockdep splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990
	 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4
	 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270
	 btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230
	 btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570
	 process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0
	 worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0
	 kthread+0x133/0x150
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  -> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
	 btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440
	 btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0
	 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0
	 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0
	 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60
	 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640
	 do_mmap+0x376/0x580
	 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120
	 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230
	 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
	 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
	 __might_fault+0x68/0x90
	 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
	 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
	 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
	 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
	 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
	 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-fs-00);
				 lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
				 lock(btrfs-fs-00);
    lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  1 lock held by compsize/11122:
   #0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922
  Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
   check_noncircular+0x165/0x180
   __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
   lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
   ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
   ? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90
   __might_fault+0x68/0x90
   ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
   _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
   copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
   ? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360
   search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
   btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
   btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
   ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70
   ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
   ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
   do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks,
which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user().
This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed.
Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then
copy_to_user_nofault for the copying.

CC: [email protected] # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 24, 2020
@namhyung @gregkh
perf test: Free formats for perf pmu parse test
e70bf2e 
[ Upstream commit d26383dcb2b4b8629fde05270b4e3633be9e3d4b ]

The following leaks were detected by ASAN:

  Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fecc305180e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e)
    #1 0x560578f6dce5 in perf_pmu__new_format util/pmu.c:1333
    #2 0x560578f752fc in perf_pmu_parse util/pmu.y:59
    #3 0x560578f6a8b7 in perf_pmu__format_parse util/pmu.c:73
    #4 0x560578e07045 in test__pmu tests/pmu.c:155
    #5 0x560578de109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410
    #6 0x560578de109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440
    #7 0x560578de401a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661
    #8 0x560578de401a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807
    #9 0x560578e49354 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312
    #10 0x560578ce71a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364
    #11 0x560578ce71a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408
    #12 0x560578ce71a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538
    #13 0x7fecc2b7acc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308

Fixes: cff7f95 ("perf tests: Move pmu tests into separate object")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 1, 2020
@gregkh
serial: 8250_omap: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context …
cd8dda5 
…during probe

[ Upstream commit 4ce35a3617c0ac758c61122b2218b6c8c9ac9398 ]

When booting j721e the following bug is printed:

[    1.154821] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/sched/completion.c:99
[    1.154827] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 128, non_block: 0, pid: 12, name: kworker/0:1
[    1.154832] 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/12:
[    1.154836]  #0: ffff000840030728 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d4/0x6e8
[    1.154852]  #1: ffff80001214fdd8 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d4/0x6e8
[    1.154860]  #2: ffff00084060b170 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: __device_attach+0x38/0x138
[    1.154872] irq event stamp: 63096
[    1.154881] hardirqs last  enabled at (63095): [<ffff800010b74318>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x70/0x78
[    1.154887] hardirqs last disabled at (63096): [<ffff800010b740d8>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x28/0x80
[    1.154893] softirqs last  enabled at (62254): [<ffff800010080c88>] _stext+0x488/0x564
[    1.154899] softirqs last disabled at (62247): [<ffff8000100fdb3c>] irq_exit+0x114/0x140
[    1.154906] CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc6-next-20200318-00094-g45e4089b0bd3 #221
[    1.154911] Hardware name: Texas Instruments K3 J721E SoC (DT)
[    1.154917] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
[    1.154923] Call trace:
[    1.154928]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x190
[    1.154933]  show_stack+0x14/0x20
[    1.154940]  dump_stack+0xe0/0x148
[    1.154946]  ___might_sleep+0x150/0x1f0
[    1.154952]  __might_sleep+0x4c/0x80
[    1.154957]  wait_for_completion_timeout+0x40/0x140
[    1.154964]  ti_sci_set_device_state+0xa0/0x158
[    1.154969]  ti_sci_cmd_get_device_exclusive+0x14/0x20
[    1.154977]  ti_sci_dev_start+0x34/0x50
[    1.154984]  genpd_runtime_resume+0x78/0x1f8
[    1.154991]  __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x140
[    1.154996]  rpm_callback+0x20/0x80
[    1.155001]  rpm_resume+0x568/0x758
[    1.155007]  __pm_runtime_resume+0x44/0xb0
[    1.155013]  omap8250_probe+0x2b4/0x508
[    1.155019]  platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa0
[    1.155023]  really_probe+0xd4/0x318
[    1.155028]  driver_probe_device+0x54/0xe8
[    1.155033]  __device_attach_driver+0x80/0xb8
[    1.155039]  bus_for_each_drv+0x74/0xc0
[    1.155044]  __device_attach+0xdc/0x138
[    1.155049]  device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
[    1.155053]  bus_probe_device+0x98/0xa0
[    1.155058]  deferred_probe_work_func+0x74/0xb0
[    1.155063]  process_one_work+0x280/0x6e8
[    1.155068]  worker_thread+0x48/0x430
[    1.155073]  kthread+0x108/0x138
[    1.155079]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18

To fix the bug we need to first call pm_runtime_enable() prior to any
pm_runtime calls.

Reported-by: Tomi Valkeinen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 29, 2020
@sm00th @gregkh
pty: do tty_flip_buffer_push without port->lock in pty_write
3070d0f 
[ Upstream commit 71a174b39f10b4b93223d374722aa894b5d8a82e ]

b6da31b2c07c "tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag"
puts tty_flip_buffer_push under port->lock introducing the following
possible circular locking dependency:

[30129.876566] ======================================================
[30129.876566] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[30129.876567] 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 Tainted: G S      W
[30129.876568] ------------------------------------------------------
[30129.876568] sysrq.sh/1222 is trying to acquire lock:
[30129.876569] ffffffff92c39480 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_unlock+0x3fe/0xa90

[30129.876572] but task is already holding lock:
[30129.876572] ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca

[30129.876576] which lock already depends on the new lock.

[30129.876577] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

[30129.876578] -> #3 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}:
[30129.876581]        _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70
[30129.876581]        __queue_work+0x1a3/0x10f0
[30129.876582]        queue_work_on+0x78/0x80
[30129.876582]        pty_write+0x165/0x1e0
[30129.876583]        n_tty_write+0x47f/0xf00
[30129.876583]        tty_write+0x3d6/0x8d0
[30129.876584]        vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650

[30129.876588] -> #2 (&port->lock#2){-.-.}-{2:2}:
[30129.876590]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80
[30129.876591]        tty_port_tty_get+0x1d/0xb0
[30129.876592]        tty_port_default_wakeup+0xb/0x30
[30129.876592]        serial8250_tx_chars+0x3d6/0x970
[30129.876593]        serial8250_handle_irq.part.12+0x216/0x380
[30129.876593]        serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x82/0xe0
[30129.876594]        serial8250_interrupt+0xdd/0x1b0
[30129.876595]        __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xfc/0x850

[30129.876602] -> #1 (&port->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
[30129.876605]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80
[30129.876605]        serial8250_console_write+0x12d/0x900
[30129.876606]        console_unlock+0x679/0xa90
[30129.876606]        register_console+0x371/0x6e0
[30129.876607]        univ8250_console_init+0x24/0x27
[30129.876607]        console_init+0x2f9/0x45e

[30129.876609] -> #0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}:
[30129.876611]        __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90
[30129.876612]        lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0
[30129.876612]        console_unlock+0x460/0xa90
[30129.876613]        vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420
[30129.876613]        printk+0x9f/0xc5
[30129.876614]        show_pwq+0x154/0x618
[30129.876615]        show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca
[30129.876615]        __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460
[30129.876616]        write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a
[30129.876616]        proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240
[30129.876617]        vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650

[30129.876619] other info that might help us debug this:

[30129.876620] Chain exists of:
[30129.876621]   console_owner --> &port->lock#2 --> &pool->lock/1

[30129.876625]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[30129.876626]        CPU0                    CPU1
[30129.876626]        ----                    ----
[30129.876627]   lock(&pool->lock/1);
[30129.876628]                                lock(&port->lock#2);
[30129.876630]                                lock(&pool->lock/1);
[30129.876631]   lock(console_owner);

[30129.876633]  *** DEADLOCK ***

[30129.876634] 5 locks held by sysrq.sh/1222:
[30129.876634]  #0: ffff8881d3ce0470 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x359/0x650
[30129.876637]  #1: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __handle_sysrq+0x4d/0x460
[30129.876640]  #2: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: show_workqueue_state+0x5/0xf0
[30129.876642]  #3: ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca
[30129.876645]  #4: ffffffff92c39980 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: vprintk_emit+0x123/0x420

[30129.876648] stack backtrace:
[30129.876649] CPU: 3 PID: 1222 Comm: sysrq.sh Tainted: G S      W         5.9.0-rc2+ #3
[30129.876649] Hardware name: Intel Corporation 2012 Client Platform/Emerald Lake 2, BIOS ACRVMBY1.86C.0078.P00.1201161002 01/16/2012
[30129.876650] Call Trace:
[30129.876650]  dump_stack+0x9d/0xe0
[30129.876651]  check_noncircular+0x34f/0x410
[30129.876653]  __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90
[30129.876656]  lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0
[30129.876658]  console_unlock+0x460/0xa90
[30129.876660]  vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420
[30129.876660]  printk+0x9f/0xc5
[30129.876661]  show_pwq+0x154/0x618
[30129.876662]  show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca
[30129.876664]  __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460
[30129.876665]  write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a
[30129.876665]  proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240
[30129.876666]  vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650

It looks like the commit was aimed to protect tty_insert_flip_string and
there is no need for tty_flip_buffer_push to be under this lock.

Fixes: b6da31b2c07c ("tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2020
@gregkh
dmaengine: pl330: _prep_dma_memcpy: Fix wrong burst size
a7931dc 
[ Upstream commit e773ca7da8beeca7f17fe4c9d1284a2b66839cc1 ]

Actually, burst size is equal to '1 << desc->rqcfg.brst_size'.
we should use burst size, not desc->rqcfg.brst_size.

dma memcpy performance on Rockchip RV1126
@ 1512MHz A7, 1056MHz LPDDR3, 200MHz DMA:

dmatest:

/# echo dma0chan0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/channel
/# echo 4194304 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/test_buf_size
/# echo 8 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/iterations
/# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/norandom
/# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/verbose
/# echo 1 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run

dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #1: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #2: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #3: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #4: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #5: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #6: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #7: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #8: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000

Before:

  dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 48 iops 200338 KB/s (0)

After this patch:

  dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 179 iops 734873 KB/s (0)

After this patch and increase dma clk to 400MHz:

  dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 259 iops 1062929 KB/s (0)

Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 14, 2020
@josefbacik @gregkh
btrfs: sysfs: init devices outside of the chunk_mutex
d9ff783 
commit ca10845a56856fff4de3804c85e6424d0f6d0cde upstream

While running btrfs/061, btrfs/073, btrfs/078, or btrfs/178 we hit the
following lockdep splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff96ecc22ef4a0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80
	 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200
	 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270
	 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0
	 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0
	 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130
	 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240
	 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40
	 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
	 path_mount+0x434/0xc00
	 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
	 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150
	 kernfs_create_link+0x63/0xa0
	 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0
	 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x81/0x130
	 btrfs_init_new_device+0x67f/0x1250
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ef/0x2e20
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
	 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0
	 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210
	 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0
	 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310
	 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60
	 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530
	 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0
	 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0
	 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x90/0x4f0
	 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x93/0x140
	 btrfs_log_inode+0x5de/0x2020
	 btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x429/0xc90
	 btrfs_log_new_name+0x95/0x9b
	 btrfs_rename2+0xbb9/0x1800
	 vfs_rename+0x64f/0x9f0
	 do_renameat2+0x320/0x4e0
	 __x64_sys_rename+0x1f/0x30
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0
	 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
	 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
	 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500
	 evict+0xcf/0x1f0
	 dispose_list+0x48/0x70
	 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50
	 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0
	 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0
	 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290
	 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0
	 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670
	 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0
	 kthread+0x138/0x160
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(fs_reclaim);
				 lock(kernfs_mutex);
				 lock(fs_reclaim);
    lock(&delayed_node->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  3 locks held by kswapd0/100:
   #0: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
   #1: ffffffff8dd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290
   #2: ffff96ed2ade30e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #4
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8
   check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150
   __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0
   lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0
   ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
   __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500
   evict+0xcf/0x1f0
   dispose_list+0x48/0x70
   prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50
   super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0
   do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0
   shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290
   shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0
   balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670
   kswapd+0x213/0x4c0
   ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50
   ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70
   ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670
   kthread+0x138/0x160
   ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

This happens because we are holding the chunk_mutex at the time of
adding in a new device.  However we only need to hold the
device_list_mutex, as we're going to iterate over the fs_devices
devices.  Move the sysfs init stuff outside of the chunk_mutex to get
rid of this lockdep splat.

CC: [email protected] # 4.4.x: f3cd2c58110dad14e: btrfs: sysfs, rename device_link add/remove functions
CC: [email protected] # 4.4.x
Reported-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
[sudip: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 29, 2020
@nathanlynch @gregkh
powerpc/pseries/hibernation: drop pseries_suspend_begin() from suspen…
0af1cd1 
…d ops

[ Upstream commit 52719fce3f4c7a8ac9eaa191e8d75a697f9fbcbc ]

There are three ways pseries_suspend_begin() can be reached:

1. When "mem" is written to /sys/power/state:

kobj_attr_store()
-> state_store()
  -> pm_suspend()
    -> suspend_devices_and_enter()
      -> pseries_suspend_begin()

This never works because there is no way to supply a valid stream id
using this interface, and H_VASI_STATE is called with a stream id of
zero. So this call path is useless at best.

2. When a stream id is written to /sys/devices/system/power/hibernate.
pseries_suspend_begin() is polled directly from store_hibernate()
until the stream is in the "Suspending" state (i.e. the platform is
ready for the OS to suspend execution):

dev_attr_store()
-> store_hibernate()
  -> pseries_suspend_begin()

3. When a stream id is written to /sys/devices/system/power/hibernate
(continued). After #2, pseries_suspend_begin() is called once again
from the pm core:

dev_attr_store()
-> store_hibernate()
  -> pm_suspend()
    -> suspend_devices_and_enter()
      -> pseries_suspend_begin()

This is redundant because the VASI suspend state is already known to
be Suspending.

The begin() callback of platform_suspend_ops is optional, so we can
simply remove that assignment with no loss of function.

Fixes: 32d8ad4 ("powerpc/pseries: Partition hibernation support")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 29, 2020
@chenglin130 @gregkh
nfs_common: need lock during iterate through the list
28b4a8b 
[ Upstream commit 4a9d81caf841cd2c0ae36abec9c2963bf21d0284 ]

If the elem is deleted during be iterated on it, the iteration
process will fall into an endless loop.

kernel: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#4 stuck for 22s! [nfsd:17137]

PID: 17137  TASK: ffff8818d93c0000  CPU: 4   COMMAND: "nfsd"
    [exception RIP: __state_in_grace+76]
    RIP: ffffffffc00e817c  RSP: ffff8818d3aefc98  RFLAGS: 00000246
    RAX: ffff881dc0c38298  RBX: ffffffff81b03580  RCX: ffff881dc02c9f50
    RDX: ffff881e3fce8500  RSI: 0000000000000001  RDI: ffffffff81b03580
    RBP: ffff8818d3aefca0   R8: 0000000000000020   R9: ffff8818d3aefd40
    R10: ffff88017fc03800  R11: ffff8818e83933c0  R12: ffff8818d3aefd40
    R13: 0000000000000000  R14: ffff8818e8391068  R15: ffff8818fa6e4000
    CS: 0010  SS: 0018
 #0 [ffff8818d3aefc98] opens_in_grace at ffffffffc00e81e3 [grace]
 #1 [ffff8818d3aefca8] nfs4_preprocess_stateid_op at ffffffffc02a3e6c [nfsd]
 #2 [ffff8818d3aefd18] nfsd4_write at ffffffffc028ed5b [nfsd]
 #3 [ffff8818d3aefd80] nfsd4_proc_compound at ffffffffc0290a0d [nfsd]
 #4 [ffff8818d3aefdd0] nfsd_dispatch at ffffffffc027b800 [nfsd]
 #5 [ffff8818d3aefe08] svc_process_common at ffffffffc02017f3 [sunrpc]
 #6 [ffff8818d3aefe70] svc_process at ffffffffc0201ce3 [sunrpc]
 #7 [ffff8818d3aefe98] nfsd at ffffffffc027b117 [nfsd]
 #8 [ffff8818d3aefec8] kthread at ffffffff810b88c1
 #9 [ffff8818d3aeff50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff816d1607

The troublemake elem:
crash> lock_manager ffff881dc0c38298
struct lock_manager {
  list = {
    next = 0xffff881dc0c38298,
    prev = 0xffff881dc0c38298
  },
  block_opens = false
}

Fixes: c87fb4a ("lockd: NLM grace period shouldn't block NFSv4 opens")
Signed-off-by: Cheng Lin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@aixlinux