Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dev Tools: remove lnav dependency from beta branch #6225

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

onetechnical
Copy link
Contributor

@onetechnical onetechnical commented Jan 10, 2025

Summary

This cherry-pick of the lnav dev tool removal to the beta branch to unblock CI testing.

Test Plan

N/A Not a code change

@onetechnical onetechnical self-assigned this Jan 10, 2025
@onetechnical onetechnical changed the base branch from master to rel/beta January 10, 2025 14:33
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 51.84%. Comparing base (fdf5711) to head (0578a61).
Report is 2 commits behind head on rel/beta.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           rel/beta    #6225      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     52.04%   51.84%   -0.21%     
============================================
  Files           643      643              
  Lines         86382    86382              
============================================
- Hits          44959    44784     -175     
- Misses        38566    38730     +164     
- Partials       2857     2868      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@algojohnlee algojohnlee merged commit a92bb19 into algorand:rel/beta Jan 10, 2025
19 checks passed
@onetechnical onetechnical deleted the onetechnical/lnav-beta branch January 10, 2025 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants