-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 632
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added version control diff #1345
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1345 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 91.48% 91.89% +0.40%
==========================================
Files 150 152 +2
Lines 10607 11032 +425
==========================================
+ Hits 9704 10138 +434
+ Misses 903 894 -9
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix tests to use assertions, lgtm otherwise.
@@ -426,19 +433,63 @@ def checkout(self, address: str, create: bool = False) -> str: | |||
def log(self): | |||
"""Displays the details of all the past commits.""" | |||
commit_node = self.version_state["commit_node"] | |||
logger.info("---------------\nHub Version Log\n---------------\n") | |||
logger.info(f"Current Branch: {self.version_state['branch']}") | |||
print("---------------\nHub Version Log\n---------------\n") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we comprehensively changing these emits or cherry picking as we go along?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We only have 2 functions that deliberately print out something, diff and log.
Realized that print was a better choice while implementing diff, changed log too for consistency.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The cluster setup (atm) will capture stdout
emits as log. Strongly suggest removing any free form debugging logs, and strictly stick to f"<log-level> <log-msg> - <key-0>: <val-0> - [...] <key-n>: <val-n>"
formatting of logs. For debug (check with @absinha18) it is possible that stderr
is ignored and can be used for free-form debugging emits. We wants logs that we can systemically grep.
assert local_ds.commit_id != third_commit_id | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_diff_linear(local_ds, capsys): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Going forward like to see a more robust approach to test parameters. We can discuss what package in python world exist that allow for parametric tests that obviate the need for hardcoded values.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we do have parametrization with different kinds of datasets with our fixtures. This test doesn't need to use s3/gcs datasets though, so just using "local_ds" fixture works
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was actually referring to lines 371->, so the test body itself and not the source of the data. Things like local_ds.xyz.extend([1, 2, 3])
. How about something like:
def test_diff_linear(test_spec, local_ds, capsys)
where test_spec
is a dictionary of vars and funcs that generate values for the test body (which should be ideally entirely free of any hardcoded input). For now, you can init the test_spec
with values but at a later date we can fuzz the code with randomly generated test_spec
.
🚀 🚀 Pull Request
Checklist:
coverage-rate
upChanges
Need to add tests.