Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RM-187996 Release over_react_codemod 2.19.0 #220

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2023

Conversation

rmconsole-readonly-wk
Copy link
Contributor

@rmconsole-readonly-wk rmconsole-readonly-wk commented Apr 11, 2023

Pull Requests included in release:

Requested by: @alanknight-wk

Diff Between Last Tag and Proposed Release: 2.18.0...Workiva:release_over_react_codemod_2.19.0
Diff Between Last Tag and New Tag: 2.18.0...2.19.0

The logs for the request that created this PR can be found here
This pull request can be recreated by clicking here

@rmconsole3-wf rmconsole3-wf changed the title Release over_react_codemod 2.19.0 RM-187996 Release over_react_codemod 2.19.0 Apr 11, 2023
@aviary2-wf
Copy link

Security Insights

No security relevant content was detected by automated scans.

Action Items

  • Review PR for security impact; comment "security review required" if needed or unsure
  • Verify aviary.yaml coverage of security relevant code

Questions or Comments? Reach out on Slack: #support-infosec.

@alanknight-wk
Copy link
Contributor

QA +1 I ran it. CI passes.

@alanknight-wk
Copy link
Contributor

@Workiva/release-management-p

Copy link

@rmconsole-wf rmconsole-wf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 from RM

@rmconsole4-wk rmconsole4-wk merged commit 32cd43f into master Apr 11, 2023
@rmconsole4-wk rmconsole4-wk deleted the release_over_react_codemod_2.19.0 branch April 11, 2023 20:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants