Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix evap units and sign #726

Merged

Conversation

dgergel
Copy link
Contributor

@dgergel dgergel commented Aug 7, 2017

@dgergel dgergel self-assigned this Aug 7, 2017
@dgergel dgergel requested review from bartnijssen and jhamman August 7, 2017 23:40
@bartnijssen
Copy link
Member

Which #xxx is this closing (the point is to indicate which issue this PR is related to)?

@@ -159,9 +159,8 @@ vic_cesm_put_data()

// evaporation, VIC: mm, CESM: kg m-2 s-1
// TO-DO should we incorporate bare soil evap?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this TODO still relevant? My assumption is that WRF wants total evap, so if soil evap is already included in OUT_EVAP then we should be OK. If not, then we should add it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not still relevant. Since we're using evap from OUT_DATA here, it's already incorporating soil evap.

@dgergel
Copy link
Contributor Author

dgergel commented Aug 8, 2017

@bartnijssen I hadn't opened an issue. Will do that so that we can close it with this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants