[BugFix] (Part 6) Fix partition_retention_condition for iceberg with partition transforms

[LiShuMing]

Why I'm doing:

Fix bugs for mv with iceberg transforms and query_rewrite_consistency=force_mv;

What I'm doing:

1. Fix bugs for mv with iceberg transforms and query_rewrite_consistency=force_mv:

• MV with partition_retention_condition should also take care icerberg transform in creating mv since the partition expression has been adjusted with time-zone: [Feature] (Part 2) Support create materialized view from Iceberg table with multi partition columns and partition transforms #52966
• Fix partition compenstion bugs for iceberg with transformations.
• Add more tests for mv with iceberg transforms and query_rewrite_consistency=force_mv;

2. Support creating mv for list partition tables with common partition expression

• Like mv with iceberg transforms, mv for list partition tables with common partition expression will create generated columns for each partition expression.
• TODO: by default mv for list partition tables with common partition expression can not be used for rewrite as expected because user's query will be rewritten by generated columns. but you can SET disable_generated_column_rewrite=TRUE; to walk around to skip generated column rewrite and enable mv rewrite.

Fixes #53117
Fixes #52576

What type of PR is this:

• BugFix
• Feature
• Enhancement
• Refactor
• UT
• Doc
• Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

• Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
• No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

• Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
• Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
• Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
• Feature removed
• Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

• I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
• This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
  • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
• This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

• I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
  • 3.4
  • 3.3
  • 3.2
  • 3.1
  • 3.0

[LiShuMing]

@mergify rebase

[mergify]

rebase

✅ Branch has been successfully rebased

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
25 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
3.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

[github-actions]

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 205 / 226 (90.71%)

file detail

	path	covered_line	new_line	coverage	not_covered_line_detail
🔵	com/starrocks/sql/analyzer/MaterializedViewAnalyzer.java	161	182	88.46%	[811, 812, 817, 818, 852, 858, 859, 864, 865, 929, 930, 1586, 1587, 1593, 1594, 1624, 1650, 1651, 1673, 1674, 1706]
🔵	com/starrocks/scheduler/PartitionBasedMvRefreshProcessor.java	1	1	100.00%	[]
🔵	com/starrocks/sql/optimizer/MvRewritePreprocessor.java	3	3	100.00%	[]
🔵	com/starrocks/server/OlapTableFactory.java	1	1	100.00%	[]
🔵	com/starrocks/sql/optimizer/rule/transformation/materialization/compensation/OptCompensator.java	2	2	100.00%	[]
🔵	com/starrocks/sql/ast/CreateMaterializedViewStatement.java	4	4	100.00%	[]
🔵	com/starrocks/catalog/mv/MVTimelinessArbiter.java	16	16	100.00%	[]
🔵	com/starrocks/server/LocalMetastore.java	6	6	100.00%	[]
🔵	com/starrocks/alter/AlterMVJobExecutor.java	3	3	100.00%	[]
🔵	com/starrocks/sql/optimizer/rule/transformation/MaterializedViewTransparentRewriteRule.java	2	2	100.00%	[]
🔵	com/starrocks/sql/optimizer/rule/transformation/partition/PartitionSelector.java	5	5	100.00%	[]
🔵	com/starrocks/common/util/PropertyAnalyzer.java	1	1	100.00%	[]

[github-actions]

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%)