Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change module to github.com/SpiderOak/webwormhole #3

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bdzim
Copy link
Collaborator

@bdzim bdzim commented Jul 12, 2021

No description provided.

@bdzim bdzim requested a review from lucasmrod July 12, 2021 14:29
webrtc "github.com/pion/webrtc/v3"
"github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus"
"github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus/promhttp"
"golang.org/x/crypto/acme/autocert"
"nhooyr.io/websocket"
"webwormhole.io/wormhole"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why don't we use the replace keyword on the flow repo instead? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14323872/using-forked-package-import-in-go

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I meant to add the replace on the flow repo, not in this one. But am not sure exactly what's needed here.

What we need in FLOW-1966 is to run the docker image that can be built by this fork in tr. As discussed in the meetings, If we need to use git submodules then I believe that's a-ok too.

@bdzim bdzim force-pushed the feature/FLOW-1966-wormhole-docker-image branch from 7cd3904 to 8710bdf Compare July 13, 2021 14:55
@bdzim bdzim requested a review from scspideroak July 13, 2021 14:55
@bdzim bdzim force-pushed the feature/FLOW-1966-wormhole-docker-image branch 2 times, most recently from 70a9c48 to b0ebc05 Compare July 14, 2021 14:03
@bdzim bdzim force-pushed the feature/FLOW-1966-wormhole-docker-image branch from 02452ab to 2541c8a Compare July 20, 2021 14:03
Ben Zimmerman and others added 2 commits July 27, 2021 10:23
…SpiderOak/webwormhole into feature/FLOW-1966-wormhole-docker-image
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants