ci: fix classic ci

[ntindle]

Background

We moved from master -> dev for the mainline development branch without making sure it triggers the ci. This updates all the instances of development to dev for branch names. It does not attempt to verify the CI functions as needed under the new scheme

Changes 🏗️

• find replace "development" -> "dev"
• formating due to saving file in vscode
• Don't error if folder exists in classic dockerfiles

Testing 🔍

Note

Only for the new autogpt platform, currently in autogpt_platform/

• Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
• Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes correctly
• Upload agent to marketplace
• Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
• Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Branch Update The branch names have been updated from 'development' to 'dev'. This change should be verified across all workflow files to ensure consistency. Branch Update The branch names have been updated from 'development' to 'dev'. This change should be verified across all workflow files to ensure consistency. Branch Update The branch name has been updated from 'development' to 'dev'. This change should be verified across all workflow files to ensure consistency.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (dev@030ea6d). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             dev    #8338   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage       ?   49.62%           
======================================
  Files          ?      144           
  Lines          ?     8916           
  Branches       ?     1240           
======================================
  Hits           ?     4425           
  Misses         ?     4344           
  Partials       ?      147           

Flag	Coverage Δ
Linux	49.43% <ø> (?)
Windows	50.03% <ø> (?)
agbenchmark	34.07% <ø> (?)
autogpt-agent	33.94% <ø> (?)
forge	58.03% <ø> (?)
macOS	48.90% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts with the base branch, please resolve those so we can evaluate the pull request.

[github-actions]

Conflicts have been resolved! 🎉 A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

[Pwuts]

A million unrelated (formatting) changes, pls no

[ntindle]

Don't worry i'll undo them all when I get the tests passing

[aarushik93]

I didn't realise you had a PR for this already... but I merged one yesterday - does that fix what you are also trying to fix or completely different?

a2ef456

[Pwuts]

@aarushik93 this PR fixes a couple of references to develop that were missed in #8339

[ntindle]

I didn't realise you had a PR for this already... but I merged one yesterday - does that fix what you are also trying to fix or completely different?

a2ef456

Imo your pr was great because it got the ones we use often working immediately

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts with the base branch, please resolve those so we can evaluate the pull request.

[github-actions]

Conflicts have been resolved! 🎉 A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

[ntindle]

@aarushik93 ITS READY!