Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added unittest cases for commands/analyze_code.py file #4212

Merged

Conversation

gocodeo
Copy link
Contributor

@gocodeo gocodeo commented May 15, 2023

Background

Changes

  • Added unittest cases for commands/analyze_code.py

Documentation

Test Plan

  • Covered positive, edge case and negative test case for 100% code coverage

PR Quality Checklist

  • My pull request is atomic and focuses on a single change.
  • I have thoroughly tested my changes with multiple different prompts.
  • I have considered potential risks and mitigations for my changes.
  • I have documented my changes clearly and comprehensively.
  • I have not snuck in any "extra" small tweaks changes

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 15, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview May 19, 2023 9:27am

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.26 🎉

Comparison is base (5b4bcf1) 62.67% compared to head (d2b2050) 62.94%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4212      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   62.67%   62.94%   +0.26%     
==========================================
  Files          74       74              
  Lines        3400     3400              
  Branches      495      495              
==========================================
+ Hits         2131     2140       +9     
+ Misses       1120     1111       -9     
  Partials      149      149              

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@ntindle
Copy link
Member

ntindle commented May 15, 2023

Much appreciated, but we use pytest and its native functions. Would you mind converting these over?

@gocodeo
Copy link
Contributor Author

gocodeo commented May 15, 2023

@ntindle Sure will convert using pytest and its native functions

@gocodeo
Copy link
Contributor Author

gocodeo commented May 15, 2023

@ntindle I have made changes related to pytest. Can you review ?

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 16, 2023

Deployment failed with the following error:

Resource is limited - try again in 35 minutes (more than 100, code: "api-deployments-free-per-day").

@Boostrix Boostrix requested a review from ntindle May 16, 2023 13:36
@Boostrix Boostrix added this to the v0.4.0 Release milestone May 16, 2023
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 17, 2023

Deployment failed with the following error:

Resource is limited - try again in 1 hour (more than 100, code: "api-deployments-free-per-day").

@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview May 18, 2023 06:14 Inactive
@k-boikov k-boikov merged commit f13aba0 into Significant-Gravitas:master May 19, 2023
ppetermann pushed a commit to ppetermann/Auto-GPT that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants