Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update css-loader to version 0.27.0 🚀 #1432

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

css-loader just published its new version 0.27.0.

State Update 🚀
Dependency css-loader
New version 0.27.0
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of css-loader.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


GitHub Release

0.27.0 (2017-03-10)

Bug Fixes

  • sourcemaps: use abs paths & remove sourceRoot (c769ac3)
  • minimizeOptions should be query.minimize! (16c0858)
  • do not export duplicate keys (#420) (a2b85d7)

Features

  • allow removal of original class name (#445) (3f78361)
  • Include the sourceMappingURL & sourceURL when toString() (6da7e90)

The new version differs by 32 commits .

  • 9504ea5 chore(release): 0.27.0
  • 3f78361 feat: allow removal of original class name (#445)
  • 17faa31 chore(release): add standard-version & update travis build (#446)
  • 6da7e90 feat: Include the sourceMappingURL & sourceURL when toString()
  • ac7ab1f test: fix test error
  • 16c0858 fix: minimizeOptions should be query.minimize!
  • d7308bc docs: README.md line endings
  • 2303df4 docs(readme): update badge URLs
  • 24aac10 chore(release): 0.26.4
  • a2b85d7 fix: do not export duplicate keys (#420)
  • d4ac0e0 docs(readme): add intro to usage
  • 3362b10 docs(readme): practical example for images & fonts
  • c769ac3 fix(sourcemaps): use abs paths & remove sourceRoot
  • d7317ca chore(release): css-loader v0.26.2
  • 7732614 Merge pull request #428 from helloyou2012/master

There are 32 commits in total. See the full diff.


✨ Try the all new Greenkeeper GitHub Integration
With Integrations first-class bot support landed on GitHub and we’ve rewritten Greenkeeper to take full advantage of it. Simpler setup, fewer pull-requests, faster than ever.

Screencast

Try it today. Free for private repositories during beta.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 10, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #1432 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1432   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.74%   99.74%           
=======================================
  Files         141      141           
  Lines        2354     2354           
=======================================
  Hits         2348     2348           
  Misses          6        6

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 206c777...1d3ca9d. Read the comment docs.

@layershifter
Copy link
Member

Closed for housekeeping, #1434

@layershifter layershifter deleted the greenkeeper-css-loader-0.27.0 branch March 10, 2017 08:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants