[dotnet] use correct devtools session id after reinitialization

[schrufygroovy]

User description

Description

After reinitialization of the dev tools session, that new active session id should be used.

Motivation and Context

Fixes regression issue: #13755

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  PLEASE double check: in case a sessionId is provided to SendCommand() I removed the check if attachedTargetId == null and the reinitialization of the session. My assumption was in case the sessionId is given, we don't need a session re-initialization.

Checklist

• I have read the contributing document.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• All new and existing tests passed.

---

Type

bug_fix, tests

---

Description

• Enhanced DevTools session management by ensuring the session is reattached if not currently attached to a target before sending commands.
• Added a new test to ensure that closing a tab does not break the DevTools session, addressing regression issue [🐛 Bug]: dotnet | DevTools | closing tab leaves broken DevToolsSession behind. Cannot be repaired/freshly created #13755.

---

Changes walkthrough

	Relevant files
Enhancement	DevToolsSession.cs Improve DevTools Session Management in Selenium WebDriver dotnet/src/webdriver/DevTools/DevToolsSession.cs Modified SendCommand to reattach session if attachedTargetId is null before sending a command. Removed redundant session reattachment logic from overloaded SendCommand. +8/-8
Tests	DevToolsTabsTest.cs Add Test for Verifying DevTools Session After Closing Tab dotnet/test/common/DevTools/DevToolsTabsTest.cs Added a new test ClosingTabDoesNotBreakDevToolsSession to verify DevTools session remains active after closing a tab. +32/-0

---

✨ PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Description updated to latest commit (bacefcc)

• Copy walkthrough table to "Files Changed" Tab

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Review

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are focused and well-scoped, impacting DevTools session management and adding a specific test case. The logic is straightforward, and the added test directly addresses the regression issue.
🧪 Relevant tests	Yes
🔍 Possible issues	Possible Regression: Removing the check for attachedTargetId == null in the SendCommand overload that accepts a sessionId might introduce regressions if there are scenarios where reinitialization was necessary despite having a sessionId. It's important to ensure that all use cases have been considered and that this change doesn't inadvertently affect existing functionality.
🔒 Security concerns	No

---

✨ Review tool usage guide:

---

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review which includes several types of feedbacks, such as possible PR issues, security threats and relevant test in the PR. More feedbacks can be added by configuring the tool.

The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.

• When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

• With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Code Suggestions

Category	Suggestions
Enhancement	Add a check for an active connection before reinitializing the session. Consider checking if this.connection is not null and active before attempting to reattach the session in the SendCommand method. This can prevent unnecessary reinitialization if the connection is already active. dotnet/src/webdriver/DevTools/DevToolsSession.cs [244-247] -if (this.attachedTargetId == null) +if (this.attachedTargetId == null && (this.connection == null || !this.connection.IsActive)) { LogTrace("Session not currently attached to a target; reattaching"); await this.InitializeSession().ConfigureAwait(false); }
	Simplify the method signature by omitting explicit default value for CancellationToken. Avoid using default(CancellationToken) explicitly, as it is the default value for optional CancellationToken parameters. Simplify the method signature by omitting it. dotnet/src/webdriver/DevTools/DevToolsSession.cs [242] -public async Task<JToken> SendCommand(string commandName, JToken commandParameters, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default(CancellationToken), int? millisecondsTimeout = null, bool throwExceptionIfResponseNotReceived = true) +public async Task<JToken> SendCommand(string commandName, JToken commandParameters, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default, int? millisecondsTimeout = null, bool throwExceptionIfResponseNotReceived = true)
Possible issue	Rename the overloaded method to prevent potential stack overflow. To avoid potential stack overflow errors, consider renaming the overloaded SendCommand method to something more descriptive and to differentiate it from the recursive call. dotnet/src/webdriver/DevTools/DevToolsSession.cs [242] -public async Task<JToken> SendCommand(string commandName, JToken commandParameters, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default(CancellationToken), int? millisecondsTimeout = null, bool throwExceptionIfResponseNotReceived = true) +public async Task<JToken> SendCommandWithSessionCheck(string commandName, JToken commandParameters, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default(CancellationToken), int? millisecondsTimeout = null, bool throwExceptionIfResponseNotReceived = true)
Best practice	Use Assert.DoesNotThrowAsync for clearer assertion of non-throwing async operations. Consider using Assert.DoesNotThrowAsync instead of Assert.That with Throws.Nothing for better readability and intent clarity when asserting that an async operation does not throw an exception. dotnet/test/common/DevTools/DevToolsTabsTest.cs [24-28] -Assert.That( - async () => { - await domains.Console.Enable(); - }, - Throws.Nothing +Assert.DoesNotThrowAsync( + async () => await domains.Console.Enable() );
Maintainability	Use nameof for parameter names in logs for better maintainability. Use nameof for parameter names in exceptions and logs to ensure refactoring tools update them automatically and to avoid potential typos. dotnet/src/webdriver/DevTools/DevToolsSession.cs [246] -LogTrace("Session not currently attached to a target; reattaching"); +LogTrace($"{nameof(this.attachedTargetId)} not currently attached to a target; reattaching");

---

✨ Improve tool usage guide:

---

Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

• When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

• With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

See the improve usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[nvborisenko]

CI failure is not related to the changes in this PR, merging it.

Thanks @schrufygroovy for your contribution!

[p0deje]

@schrufygroovy Could you please sign the contributor license agreement via https://cla-assistant.io/SeleniumHQ/selenium?pullRequest=13768?

[schrufygroovy]

@schrufygroovy Could you please sign the contributor license agreement via https://cla-assistant.io/SeleniumHQ/selenium?pullRequest=13768?

done