-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
2e008b4
commit 914abad
Showing
1 changed file
with
61 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ | ||
# Demystifying Mir-BFT: A Deep Dive into Byzantine Fault Tolerance | ||
|
||
### Original paper: [Mir-BFT](https://www.arxiv-vanity.com/papers/1906.05552/) | ||
|
||
## Introduction | ||
|
||
In the world of distributed systems, ensuring the reliability and security of a network can be a daunting task, especially when faced with potential malicious actors and system failures. This is where Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) comes into play, offering a robust solution to these challenges. One notable BFT protocol that has gained attention is Mir-BFT, which leverages several innovative techniques to ensure the integrity and availability of distributed systems. In this blog post, we will explore Mir-BFT, its key components, and how it works. | ||
|
||
## Mir-BFT in a Nutshell | ||
|
||
Mir-BFT is a Byzantine Fault Tolerance protocol designed to provide a high level of security and fault tolerance in distributed systems. It is particularly well-suited for blockchain platforms, where maintaining consensus among a network of nodes is critical. | ||
|
||
## Key Implementation Details | ||
|
||
Mir-BFT comprises several important implementation details that enable its robust operation: | ||
|
||
1. **The Client**: When a client wants to make a request (BCAST(r)), it creates a message containing the request along with a timestamp (t). Timestamps are essential for maintaining order and consistency in a distributed system. Clients use a sliding window mechanism to manage their timestamps, ensuring that requests are processed in order. | ||
|
||
2. **Sequence Numbers and Buckets**: In each epoch, leaders are assigned specific sequence numbers for proposing batches. These sequence numbers are distributed evenly among leaders, preventing bottlenecks. Buckets are used to group requests, and their assignment to leaders is carefully managed to ensure liveness. | ||
|
||
3. **Common Case Operation**: The protocol's common case operation involves handling client requests, pre-prepare messages, and validations. It ensures that only valid requests are processed, preventing malicious attacks and ensuring the protocol's correctness. | ||
|
||
4. **Epoch Changes**: Epoch changes can occur gracefully or ungracefully. Graceful changes happen when an epoch reaches its maximum sequence numbers, while ungraceful changes occur due to timeouts or failures. The protocol smoothly transitions from one epoch to another, ensuring that nodes remain in sync. | ||
|
||
5. **Checkpointing (Garbage Collection)**: Checkpoints are used to prune message logs and ensure the system's efficiency. Nodes periodically send checkpoint messages to each other, allowing for the removal of old data. | ||
|
||
6. **Signature Verification Sharding (SVS)**: To optimize performance, Mir-BFT employs signature verification sharding, where not all nodes verify all client signatures. This technique reduces CPU load during stable epochs without compromising security. | ||
|
||
7. **State Transfer**: In case of node failures or asynchrony, Mir-BFT implements a state transfer mechanism to synchronize nodes' states. This ensures that recovered nodes can rejoin the network seamlessly. | ||
|
||
8. **Membership Reconfiguration**: Adding or removing nodes and clients is handled through configuration requests, which are ordered and executed during checkpoints to maintain consensus. | ||
|
||
9. **Durability (Persisting State)**: While Mir-BFT doesn't require state persistence, nodes can choose to persist state information for recovery purposes. This optional feature ensures nodes can recover from crashes without compromising system integrity. | ||
|
||
10. **Implementation Architecture**: The Mir-BFT protocol is implemented in Go and leverages multi-threading and parallelism to maximize performance. It utilizes multiple network connections between nodes and handles client requests independently of the main protocol. | ||
|
||
## How Mir-BFT Works | ||
|
||
Mir-BFT achieves Byzantine Fault Tolerance by carefully orchestrating the interactions between nodes and clients. Here's a simplified overview of how it works: | ||
|
||
1. **Client Requests**: Clients send requests to the network, and these requests are timestamped to maintain order. These requests are initially sent to a subset of nodes. | ||
|
||
2. **Common Case Operation**: Nodes validate and process incoming client requests, creating batches and pre-prepare messages. These messages are used to reach consensus among nodes. | ||
|
||
3. **Epoch Changes**: When an epoch ends, nodes transition to the next epoch, either gracefully or ungracefully. During this transition, nodes update their configurations and continue processing requests. | ||
|
||
4. **Checkpointing**: Periodically, nodes perform checkpointing to remove old data and keep the network efficient. | ||
|
||
5. **Signature Verification Sharding**: In stable epochs, only a subset of nodes verifies client signatures, reducing the computational load. | ||
|
||
6. **State Transfer**: In the event of node failures, state transfer mechanisms ensure that recovered nodes can synchronize with the rest of the network. | ||
|
||
7. **Membership Reconfiguration**: Adding or removing nodes and clients is handled during checkpoints to maintain consensus. | ||
|
||
## Conclusion | ||
|
||
Mir-BFT is a powerful Byzantine Fault Tolerance protocol designed to ensure the integrity and reliability of distributed systems, particularly in blockchain platforms. Its careful implementation details, such as sequence numbers, buckets, and signature verification sharding, make it a robust solution for achieving consensus among distributed nodes. | ||
|
||
Understanding Mir-BFT requires delving into its inner workings, from timestamp management to graceful epoch changes and state transfers. By implementing these techniques, Mir-BFT offers a high level of security and fault tolerance, making it a valuable tool in the world of distributed systems. | ||
|
||
As distributed systems continue to evolve, protocols like Mir-BFT play a crucial role in enabling the trust and reliability needed for applications ranging from cryptocurrencies to supply chain management and beyond. |