Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

global_extent wrong when pixel_buffer in source constraints #334

Open
jdries opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

global_extent wrong when pixel_buffer in source constraints #334

jdries opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jdries
Copy link
Contributor

jdries commented Dec 6, 2024

When processes apply a 'pixel_buffer', this is not taken into account when determining global bounds in the dry run.
It is however taken into account when constructing layoutdefinition, which is necessary because otherwise spatial keys could get negative.

As a result, we get cubes with different layoutdefinition, and thus slower merge_cubes + extra resample_cube_spatial.

@jdries jdries self-assigned this Dec 6, 2024
jdries added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2024
* take pixel buffer into account for global extent
#334

* take pixel buffer into account for global extent
#334

* take pixel buffer into account for global extent
#334

* take pixel buffer into account for global extent
#334

* take pixel buffer into account for global extent
#334

* take pixel buffer into account for global extent
#334
EmileSonneveld added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2024
jdries added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2024
jdries added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2024
jdries added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2024
jdries added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2024
jdries added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2024
jdries added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2024
* #334 reproject bbox before applying buffer, add resample to mask

* #334 to_scl_dilation_mask should block resampling params

* #334 test fixes

* #334 add test

* #334 fix test

* #334 extra check on actual resampling

* #334 test fixes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant