[17.0][MIG] sale_order_general_discount: 17.0 #3030
Conversation
miguel-S73
force-pushed
the
17.0-mig-sale_order_general_discount
branch
from
c88e882 to
56b038f
Compare
|
@miguel-S73 some tests failed, do you need some help or you are already working on this? |
miguel-S73
force-pushed
the
17.0-mig-sale_order_general_discount
branch
from
56b038f to
c0defa4
Compare
|
@gbtechnology now I have fixed red flags |
|
@miguel-S73 cool! |
|
@sergio-teruel @pedrobaeza @ivantodorovich @rven |
pedrobaeza
changed the title
|
Please say to one of your colleagues to review it and I'll review it too. /ocabot migration sale_order_general_discount |
| general_discount_apply = fields.Boolean( | ||
| string="Apply general discount", | ||
| default=True, | ||
| required=True, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
required in a boolean is useless.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I removed this attribute in my last commit. My intention was to do a cherry-pick and then apply my changes.
| required=True, | ||
| help="If this checkbox is ticked, it means changing general discount on sale order " | ||
| "will impact sale order lines with this related product.", | ||
| not_general_discount_apply = fields.Boolean( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's not convenient to name negative fields. Better something like bypass_general_discount.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Now I have applied this suggested change
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| @api.model_create_multi | ||
| def create(self, vals_list): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't like this override, and doing the field computed writable shouldn't be needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have check funcionality after I remove this override and work fine.
miguel-S73
force-pushed
the
17.0-mig-sale_order_general_discount
branch
from
c0defa4 to
e2c2fb4
Compare
|
/ocabot migration sale_order_general_discount |
…unt for all sale order lines
…nes created without UI form view
[MIG] Migrated sale_order_general_discount to v13. [IMP] Improved code as per request. [IMP][13.0] sale_order_general_discount: rebase with OCA/13.0 + apply pre-commit [UPD] sale_order_general_discount: update view to display percentage correctly
version conflict prevents upload to pypi
Currently translated at 100.0% (5 of 5 strings) Translation: sale-workflow-14.0/sale-workflow-14.0-sale_order_general_discount Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/sale-workflow-14-0/sale-workflow-14-0-sale_order_general_discount/it/
Currently translated at 100.0% (5 of 5 strings) Translation: sale-workflow-16.0/sale-workflow-16.0-sale_order_general_discount Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/sale-workflow-16-0/sale-workflow-16-0-sale_order_general_discount/pt_BR/
Set general discount as line discount only if there's a general discount.
It's not needed anymore. This is handled by the compute.
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: sale-workflow-16.0/sale-workflow-16.0-sale_order_general_discount Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/sale-workflow-16-0/sale-workflow-16-0-sale_order_general_discount/
…al discount apply product option
adrip-s73
force-pushed
the
17.0-mig-sale_order_general_discount
branch
from
e2c2fb4 to
0c8f381
Compare
adrip-s73
force-pushed
the
17.0-mig-sale_order_general_discount
branch
from
0c8f381 to
0f8e50e
Compare
|
/ocabot merge nobump |
|
This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it! |
|
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 61f2e0b. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Standard migration from 16.0 to 17.0 and I have added
cherry-pick#2524 and this suggestion OCA/server-backend#221 (review) too.