Typo fixes

README.md

@@ -17,47 +17,47 @@ This process is followed when one intends to make "substantial" changes to the
 Nix ecosystem. What constitutes a "substantial" change is evolving based on
 community norms, but may include the following.
 
-* Any semantic or syntactic change to the language that is not a bugfix
+* Any semantic or syntactic change to the language that is not a bug fix
 * Removing language features
-* Big restructuring of nixpkgs
-* Expansions to the scope of nixpkgs (new arch, major subprojects, ...)
+* Big restructuring of Nixpkgs
+* Expansions to the scope of Nixpkgs (new arch, major subprojects, ...)
 * Introduction of new interfaces or functions
 
 Certain changes do not require an RFC:
 
-* Adding, updating and removing packages in nixpkgs
+* Adding, updating and removing packages in Nixpkgs
 * Fixing security updates and bugs that don't break interfaces
 
-Pull requests that contain any of the afore mentioned 'substantial' changes may be closed if there is no RFC connected to the proposed changes.
+Pull requests that contain any of the aforementioned 'substantial' changes may be closed if there is no RFC connected to the proposed changes.
 
 ## Description of the process
 
 In short, to get a major feature added to the Nix ecosystem, one should first
-go through the RFC process in order to improve the likelyhood of inclusion.
+go through the RFC process in order to improve the likelihood of inclusion.
 Here are roughly the steps that one would take:
 
-* Fork the RFC repo https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs
+* Fork the RFC repository https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs
 * Copy `0000-template.md` to `rfcs/0000-my-feature.md` (where 'my-feature' is
   descriptive. don't assign an RFC number yet).
 * Fill in the RFC
-* Submit a pull request. Rename the rfcs with the PR number. (eg: PR #123 would
+* Submit a pull request. Rename the RFC with the PR number. (eg: PR #123 would
   be `rfcs/0123-my-feature.md`)
 
 At this point, the person submitting the RFC should find at least one "co-author"
 that will help them bring the RFC to completion. The goal is to improve the
 chances that the RFC is both desired and likely to be implemented.
 
 Once the author is happy with the state of the RFC, they should seek for
-wider community review by stating the readyness of the work. Advertisement on
+wider community review by stating the readiness of the work. Advertisement on
 the mailing-list and IRC is an acceptable way of doing that.
 
 After a number of rounds of review the discussion should settle and a general
 consensus should emerge. This bit is left intentionally vague and should be
-refined in the future. We don't have a technical commitee so controversial
+refined in the future. We don't have a technical committee so controversial
 changes will be rejected by default.
 
 If a RFC is accepted then authors may implement it and submit the feature as a
-pull request to the Nix or nixpkgs repo. An 'accepted' RFC is not a rubber
+pull request to the Nix or Nixpkgs repository. An 'accepted' RFC is not a rubber
 stamp, and in particular still does not mean the feature will ultimately be
 merged; it does mean that in principle all the major stakeholders have agreed
 to the feature and are amenable to merging it.
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ Whoever merges the RFC should do the following:
 * Commit everything.
 
 If a RFC is rejected, whoever merges the RFC should do the following:
-* Move the rfc to the rejected folder
+* Move the RFC to the rejected folder
 * Fill in the remaining metadata in the RFC header, including links for the
   original pull request(s) and the newly created issue.
 * Include a summary reason for the rejection