-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
treewide: replace substituteAll with replaceVars (#1) #365440
Conversation
|
Driving NixOS#237216 forward.
c115ccc
to
ebd18cf
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The commit message appears to GitHub to be referencing this PR:
And when merged will likely refer to this one:
|
@jwiegley posted a comment directly on the merged commit. For visibility, I reproduce it here:
This relates to Looking at the nixpkgs-review list, this package was indeed not built. Fix in #366611. |
I went through the builds that failed for other reasons during nixpkgs-review and those that didn't trigger a build at all, e.g. because of conditionals. Confirmed manually that all replacements are available - no other problems found. |
Some more gifts from the refactor tractor.
Driving towards #237216
Those are a sub-set of really simple-to-replace cases. I ran the following script:
but then only selected a smaller part of the changes with the goal of avoiding too many rebuilds, so that this can target master and easily be tested with nixpkgs-review.
Everything that fails to build is left out and will come at the end with more specific fixes.
@philiptaron
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.