-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix UI language selection in virtualbox #358400
Conversation
The fix is mimicked from Debian install of VirtualBox. Tested this on NixOS by using One peculiarity is that virtualbox installed under |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you very much for the PR. Could you please reword your commit message to "virtualbox: Fix UI language selection in virtualbox"?
c8bf776
to
2faaf8f
Compare
Sure, no problem |
Thanks, @acmelabrat, for fixing this! Tested after cherry-picking onto current nixos-unstable:
This is amazing! However, this breaks the
From investiagting further, it seems it spends most of its time in |
First off, thank you for your feedback @Yarny0 !
Just to cover all bases: Does this test pass without the cherry-picked commit?
If it expects files at a certain location, either the files need to be distributed more fine-grained (not seeing forward to that) or the test needs to be changed accordingly. |
tl;dr: All tests pass, I approve this PR without any reservations, I'm sorry for the false alarm.
Yes. To avoid nix just fetching the test's result from the binary cache, I added an extra empty line somewhere in the test's python code, and it built flawlessly. Today I tried again, with the exact same tree as yesterday. Now sigh Maybe there is some -- very time consuming and therefore very frustrating -- flakeyness somewhere in the test's logic. However, after searching for " In any case, I no longer see this PR at fault for any test-related trouble. Sorry for the confusion, @acmelabrat . From my point of view, your PR can (and should) be merged! |
@Yarny0 , no problem. It's still valuable that you looked into it. I am too novice to know for sure, but it sounds like you might've found an issue with the tests themselves. |
Is it possible to backport this PR to 24.11 by any chance? 😅 |
Successfully created backport PR for |
Previously only English was available as UI language
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.