Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gdk-pixbuf: multiple module files #153275
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
gdk-pixbuf: multiple module files #153275
Changes from 7 commits
b079a65
5c5b68c
3beecc8
b79df1a
5ebf782
fd073f9
a4e5e1e
0b5b13b
31da251
86b36dd
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe add
[]{#setup-hook-gdk-pixbuf}
so that the deleted setup hook section points here as well.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is desirable to use fake modules here even after they have been packaged to allow testing
wrapGAppsHook
changes with minimal changes.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To clean this up, it might be nice to move this to the
sample-project
and then useinstallFlags = [ "loaders.cache" ];
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think they should be separate, since the sample-project is wrapped by the setup hook and the mock loader is an input for the wrapper.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I meant move it to the
Makefile
insample-project
, then you will be able to usesrc
&installFlags
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should not this be
mock-pixbuf-module.lib
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I was wrong to put the mock loader it in $lib, I've changed it to $out. But the checks passed, brings up the issue that the wrapper doesn't check for the cache file's existence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would probably make sense to have a variant of
mock-pixbuf-module
withoutputs = [ "bin" "out" ];
for testing.This file was deleted.