net/ipv6/addrconf: Add the ability to pause the addrconf work queue #2

sargun · 2020-02-12T00:40:50Z

No description provided.

commit a72f4ac upstream. Add a check that the size specified in the flow spec header doesn't cause an overflow when calculating the filter size, and thus prevent access to invalid memory. The following crash from syzkaller revealed it. kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 1 PID: 17834 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc5 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:memchr_inv+0xd3/0x330 Code: 89 f9 89 f5 83 e1 07 0f 85 f9 00 00 00 49 89 d5 49 c1 ed 03 45 85 ed 74 6f 48 89 d9 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 c1 e9 03 <80> 3c 01 00 0f 85 0d 02 00 00 44 0f b6 e5 48 b8 01 01 01 01 01 01 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000a13fa50 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 7fff88810de9d820 RCX: 0ffff11021bd3b04 RDX: 000000000000fff8 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 7fff88810de9d820 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffff888110d69018 R09: 0000000000000009 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed10236267cc R12: 0000000000000004 R13: 0000000000001fff R14: ffff88810de9d820 R15: 0000000000000040 FS: 00007f9ee0e51700(0000) GS:ffff88811b100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000115ea0006 CR4: 0000000000360ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: spec_filter_size.part.16+0x34/0x50 ib_uverbs_kern_spec_to_ib_spec_filter+0x691/0x770 ib_uverbs_ex_create_flow+0x9ea/0x1b40 ib_uverbs_write+0xaa5/0xdf0 __vfs_write+0x7c/0x100 vfs_write+0x168/0x4a0 ksys_write+0xc8/0x200 do_syscall_64+0x9c/0x390 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x465b49 Code: f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f9ee0e50c58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000073bf00 RCX: 0000000000465b49 RDX: 00000000000003a0 RSI: 00000000200007c0 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ee0e516bc R13: 00000000004ca2da R14: 000000000070deb8 R15: 00000000ffffffff Modules linked in: Dumping ftrace buffer: (ftrace buffer empty) Fixes: 94e03f1 ("IB/uverbs: Add support for flow tag") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Avihai Horon <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Maor Gottlieb <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit 1dd0178 upstream. We don't need to set pkey as valid in case that user set only one of pkey index or port number, otherwise it will be resulted in NULL pointer dereference while accessing to uninitialized pkey list. The following crash from Syzkaller revealed it. kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 1 PID: 14753 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc5 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:get_pkey_idx_qp_list+0x161/0x2d0 Code: 01 00 00 49 8b 5e 20 4c 39 e3 0f 84 b9 00 00 00 e8 e4 42 6e fe 48 8d 7b 10 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <0f> b6 04 02 84 c0 74 08 3c 01 0f 8e d0 00 00 00 48 8d 7d 04 48 b8 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000bc6f950 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff82c8bdec RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffffc900030a8000 RDI: 0000000000000010 RBP: ffff888112c8ce80 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: fffff5200178df1f R10: 0000000000000001 R11: fffff5200178df1f R12: ffff888115dc4430 R13: ffff888115da8498 R14: ffff888115dc4410 R15: ffff888115da8000 FS: 00007f20777de700(0000) GS:ffff88811b100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b2f721000 CR3: 00000001173ca002 CR4: 0000000000360ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: port_pkey_list_insert+0xd7/0x7c0 ib_security_modify_qp+0x6fa/0xfc0 _ib_modify_qp+0x8c4/0xbf0 modify_qp+0x10da/0x16d0 ib_uverbs_modify_qp+0x9a/0x100 ib_uverbs_write+0xaa5/0xdf0 __vfs_write+0x7c/0x100 vfs_write+0x168/0x4a0 ksys_write+0xc8/0x200 do_syscall_64+0x9c/0x390 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fixes: d291f1a ("IB/core: Enforce PKey security on QPs") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200212080651.GB679970@unreal Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]> Message-Id: <20200212080651.GB679970@unreal> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

Call napi_disable() twice would cause dead lock. There are three situations may result in the issue. 1. rtl8152_pre_reset() and set_carrier() are run at the same time. 2. Call rtl8152_set_tunable() after rtl8152_close(). 3. Call rtl8152_set_ringparam() after rtl8152_close(). For #1, use the same solution as commit 8481141 ("r8152: Re-order napi_disable in rtl8152_close"). For #2 and #3, add checking the flag of IFF_UP and using napi_disable/napi_enable during mutex. Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

commit 100843f upstream. While v2.6.26 commit b75db73 ("[SCSI] zfcp: Add qtcb dump to hba debug trace") is right that we don't want to flood the (payload) trace ring buffer, we don't trace successful FCP command responses by default. So we can include the channel log for problem determination with failed responses of any FSF request type. Fixes: b75db73 ("[SCSI] zfcp: Add qtcb dump to hba debug trace") Fixes: a54ca0f ("[SCSI] zfcp: Redesign of the debug tracing for HBA records.") Cc: <[email protected]> #2.6.38+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e37597b5c4ae123aaa85fd86c23a9f71e994e4a9.1572018132.git.bblock@linux.ibm.com Reviewed-by: Benjamin Block <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Block <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit 4c86b03 upstream. Target creation triggers a new BUG_ON introduced in in commit 4d43d39 ("workqueue: Try to catch flush_work() without INIT_WORK()."). The BUG_ON reveals an attempt to flush free_work in qla24xx_do_nack_work before it's initialized in qlt_unreg_sess: WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 211 at kernel/workqueue.c:3031 __flush_work.isra.38+0x40/0x2e0 CPU: 7 PID: 211 Comm: kworker/7:1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 5.3.0-rc7-vanilla+ #2 Workqueue: qla2xxx_wq qla2x00_iocb_work_fn [qla2xxx] NIP: c000000000159620 LR: c0080000009d91b0 CTR: c0000000001598c0 REGS: c000000005f3f730 TRAP: 0700 Tainted: G E (5.3.0-rc7-vanilla+) MSR: 800000000282b033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 24002222 XER: 00000000 CFAR: c0000000001598d0 IRQMASK: 0 GPR00: c0080000009d91b0 c000000005f3f9c0 c000000001670a00 c0000003f8655ca8 GPR04: c0000003f8655c00 000000000000ffff 0000000000000011 ffffffffffffffff GPR08: c008000000949228 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 c0080000009e7780 GPR12: 0000000000002200 c00000003fff6200 c000000000161bc8 0000000000000004 GPR16: c0000003f9d68280 0000000002000000 0000000000000005 0000000000000003 GPR20: 0000000000000002 000000000000ffff 0000000000000000 fffffffffffffef7 GPR24: c000000004f73848 c000000004f73838 c000000004f73f28 c000000005f3fb60 GPR28: c000000004f73e48 c000000004f73c80 c000000004f73818 c0000003f9d68280 NIP [c000000000159620] __flush_work.isra.38+0x40/0x2e0 LR [c0080000009d91b0] qla24xx_do_nack_work+0x88/0x180 [qla2xxx] Call Trace: [c000000005f3f9c0] [c000000000159644] __flush_work.isra.38+0x64/0x2e0 (unreliable) [c000000005f3fa50] [c0080000009d91a0] qla24xx_do_nack_work+0x78/0x180 [qla2xxx] [c000000005f3fae0] [c0080000009496ec] qla2x00_do_work+0x604/0xb90 [qla2xxx] [c000000005f3fc40] [c008000000949cd8] qla2x00_iocb_work_fn+0x60/0xe0 [qla2xxx] [c000000005f3fc80] [c000000000157bb8] process_one_work+0x2c8/0x5b0 [c000000005f3fd10] [c000000000157f28] worker_thread+0x88/0x660 [c000000005f3fdb0] [c000000000161d64] kthread+0x1a4/0x1b0 [c000000005f3fe20] [c00000000000b960] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x7c Instruction dump: 3d22001d 892966b1 7d908026 91810008 f821ff71 69290001 0b090000 2e290000 40920200 e9230018 7d2a0074 794ad182 <0b0a0000> 2fa90000 419e01e8 7c0802a6 ---[ end trace 5ccf335d4f90fcb8 ]--- Fixes: 1021f0b ("scsi: qla2xxx: allow session delete to finish before create.") Cc: Quinn Tran <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Acked-by: Himanshu Madhani <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Tested-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Roman Bolshakov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit bea3741 upstream. No error code was being set on this error path. Cc: [email protected] Fixes: ad4b1eb ("KEYS: asym_tpm: Implement encryption operation [ver #2]") Fixes: c08fed7 ("KEYS: Implement encrypt, decrypt and sign for software asymmetric key [ver #2]") Reviewed-by: James Morris <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 16f6b67 ] With large memory (8TB and more) hotplug, we can get soft lockup warnings as below. These were caused by a long loop without any explicit cond_resched which is a problem for !PREEMPT kernels. Avoid this using cond_resched() while inserting hash page table entries. We already do similar cond_resched() in __add_pages(), see commit f64ac5e ("mm, memory_hotplug: add scheduling point to __add_pages"). rcu: 3-....: (24002 ticks this GP) idle=13e/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=722/722 fqs=12001 (t=24003 jiffies g=4285 q=2002) NMI backtrace for cpu 3 CPU: 3 PID: 3870 Comm: ndctl Not tainted 5.3.0-197.18-default+ #2 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xb0/0xf4 (unreliable) nmi_cpu_backtrace+0x124/0x130 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x1ac/0x1f0 arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x28/0x3c rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xf8/0x154 rcu_sched_clock_irq+0x878/0xb40 update_process_times+0x48/0x90 tick_sched_handle.isra.16+0x4c/0x80 tick_sched_timer+0x68/0xe0 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x180/0x430 hrtimer_interrupt+0x110/0x300 timer_interrupt+0x108/0x2f0 decrementer_common+0x114/0x120 --- interrupt: 901 at arch_add_memory+0xc0/0x130 LR = arch_add_memory+0x74/0x130 memremap_pages+0x494/0x650 devm_memremap_pages+0x3c/0xa0 pmem_attach_disk+0x188/0x750 nvdimm_bus_probe+0xac/0x2c0 really_probe+0x148/0x570 driver_probe_device+0x19c/0x1d0 device_driver_attach+0xcc/0x100 bind_store+0x134/0x1c0 drv_attr_store+0x44/0x60 sysfs_kf_write+0x64/0x90 kernfs_fop_write+0x1a0/0x270 __vfs_write+0x3c/0x70 vfs_write+0xd0/0x260 ksys_write+0xdc/0x130 system_call+0x5c/0x68 Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit cfcbae3 ] In function __ufshcd_query_descriptor(), in the event of an error happening, we directly goto out_unlock and forget to invaliate hba->dev_cmd.query.descriptor pointer. This results in this pointer still valid in ufshcd_copy_query_response() for other query requests which go through ufshcd_exec_raw_upiu_cmd(). This will cause __memcpy() crash and system hangs. Log as shown below: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff000012233c40 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x96000047 Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000047 CM = 0, WnR = 1 swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 0000000028cc735c [ffff000012233c40] pgd=00000000bffff003, pud=00000000bfffe003, pmd=00000000ba8b8003, pte=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 96000047 [#2] PREEMPT SMP ... Call trace: __memcpy+0x74/0x180 ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd+0x250/0x3c0 ufshcd_exec_raw_upiu_cmd+0xfc/0x1a8 ufs_bsg_request+0x178/0x3b0 bsg_queue_rq+0xc0/0x118 blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0xb0/0x538 blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x18c/0x1d8 __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xb4/0x118 blk_mq_run_work_fn+0x28/0x38 process_one_work+0x1ec/0x470 worker_thread+0x48/0x458 kthread+0x130/0x138 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c Code: 540000ab a8c12027 a88120c7 a8c12027 (a88120c7) ---[ end trace 793e1eb5dff69f2d ]--- note: kworker/0:2H[2054] exited with preempt_count 1 This patch is to move "descriptor = NULL" down to below the label "out_unlock". Fixes: d44a5f9(ufs: query descriptor API) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 32546a9 ] This patch moves the final part of the cifsFileInfo_put() logic where we need a write lock on lock_sem to be processed in a separate thread that holds no other locks. This is to prevent deadlocks like the one below: > there are 6 processes looping to while trying to down_write > cinode->lock_sem, 5 of them from _cifsFileInfo_put, and one from > cifs_new_fileinfo > > and there are 5 other processes which are blocked, several of them > waiting on either PG_writeback or PG_locked (which are both set), all > for the same page of the file > > 2 inode_lock() (inode->i_rwsem) for the file > 1 wait_on_page_writeback() for the page > 1 down_read(inode->i_rwsem) for the inode of the directory > 1 inode_lock()(inode->i_rwsem) for the inode of the directory > 1 __lock_page > > > so processes are blocked waiting on: > page flags PG_locked and PG_writeback for one specific page > inode->i_rwsem for the directory > inode->i_rwsem for the file > cifsInodeInflock_sem > > > > here are the more gory details (let me know if I need to provide > anything more/better): > > [0 00:48:22.765] [UN] PID: 8863 TASK: ffff8c691547c5c0 CPU: 3 > COMMAND: "reopen_file" > #0 [ffff9965007e3ba8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095 > #1 [ffff9965007e3c38] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df > #2 [ffff9965007e3c48] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff9af283d7 > #3 [ffff9965007e3cb8] legitimize_path at ffffffff9b0f975d > #4 [ffff9965007e3d08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe55d > #5 [ffff9965007e3dd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33 > #6 [ffff9965007e3ee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6 > #7 [ffff9965007e3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315 > * (I think legitimize_path is bogus) > > in path_openat > } else { > const char *s = path_init(nd, flags); > while (!(error = link_path_walk(s, nd)) && > (error = do_last(nd, file, op)) > 0) { <<<< > > do_last: > if (open_flag & O_CREAT) > inode_lock(dir->d_inode); <<<< > else > so it's trying to take inode->i_rwsem for the directory > > DENTRY INODE SUPERBLK TYPE PATH > ffff8c68bb8e79c0 ffff8c691158ef20 ffff8c6915bf9000 DIR /mnt/vm1_smb/ > inode.i_rwsem is ffff8c691158efc0 > > <struct rw_semaphore 0xffff8c691158efc0>: > owner: <struct task_struct 0xffff8c6914275d00> (UN - 8856 - > reopen_file), counter: 0x0000000000000003 > waitlist: 2 > 0xffff9965007e3c90 8863 reopen_file UN 0 1:29:22.926 > RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE > 0xffff996500393e00 9802 ls UN 0 1:17:26.700 > RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ > > > the owner of the inode.i_rwsem of the directory is: > > [0 00:00:00.109] [UN] PID: 8856 TASK: ffff8c6914275d00 CPU: 3 > COMMAND: "reopen_file" > #0 [ffff99650065b828] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095 > #1 [ffff99650065b8b8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df > #2 [ffff99650065b8c8] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89 > #3 [ffff99650065b940] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9 > #4 [ffff99650065b948] _cifsFileInfo_put.cold.63 at ffffffffc0a42dd6 [cifs] > #5 [ffff99650065ba38] cifs_writepage_locked at ffffffffc0a0b8f3 [cifs] > #6 [ffff99650065bab0] cifs_launder_page at ffffffffc0a0bb72 [cifs] > #7 [ffff99650065bb30] invalidate_inode_pages2_range at ffffffff9b04d4bd > #8 [ffff99650065bcb8] cifs_invalidate_mapping at ffffffffc0a11339 [cifs] > torvalds#9 [ffff99650065bcd0] cifs_revalidate_mapping at ffffffffc0a1139a [cifs] > torvalds#10 [ffff99650065bcf0] cifs_d_revalidate at ffffffffc0a014f6 [cifs] > torvalds#11 [ffff99650065bd08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe7f7 > torvalds#12 [ffff99650065bdd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33 > torvalds#13 [ffff99650065bee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6 > torvalds#14 [ffff99650065bf38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315 > > cifs_launder_page is for page 0xffffd1e2c07d2480 > > crash> page.index,mapping,flags 0xffffd1e2c07d2480 > index = 0x8 > mapping = 0xffff8c68f3cd0db0 > flags = 0xfffffc0008095 > > PAGE-FLAG BIT VALUE > PG_locked 0 0000001 > PG_uptodate 2 0000004 > PG_lru 4 0000010 > PG_waiters 7 0000080 > PG_writeback 15 0008000 > > > inode is ffff8c68f3cd0c40 > inode.i_rwsem is ffff8c68f3cd0ce0 > DENTRY INODE SUPERBLK TYPE PATH > ffff8c68a1f1b480 ffff8c68f3cd0c40 ffff8c6915bf9000 REG > /mnt/vm1_smb/testfile.8853 > > > this process holds the inode->i_rwsem for the parent directory, is > laundering a page attached to the inode of the file it's opening, and in > _cifsFileInfo_put is trying to down_write the cifsInodeInflock_sem > for the file itself. > > > <struct rw_semaphore 0xffff8c68f3cd0ce0>: > owner: <struct task_struct 0xffff8c6914272e80> (UN - 8854 - > reopen_file), counter: 0x0000000000000003 > waitlist: 1 > 0xffff9965005dfd80 8855 reopen_file UN 0 1:29:22.912 > RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE > > this is the inode.i_rwsem for the file > > the owner: > > [0 00:48:22.739] [UN] PID: 8854 TASK: ffff8c6914272e80 CPU: 2 > COMMAND: "reopen_file" > #0 [ffff99650054fb38] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095 > #1 [ffff99650054fbc8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df > #2 [ffff99650054fbd8] io_schedule at ffffffff9b6e68e2 > #3 [ffff99650054fbe8] __lock_page at ffffffff9b03c56f > #4 [ffff99650054fc80] pagecache_get_page at ffffffff9b03dcdf > #5 [ffff99650054fcc0] grab_cache_page_write_begin at ffffffff9b03ef4c > #6 [ffff99650054fcd0] cifs_write_begin at ffffffffc0a064ec [cifs] > #7 [ffff99650054fd30] generic_perform_write at ffffffff9b03bba4 > #8 [ffff99650054fda8] __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff9b04060a > torvalds#9 [ffff99650054fdf0] cifs_strict_writev.cold.70 at ffffffffc0a4469b [cifs] > torvalds#10 [ffff99650054fe48] new_sync_write at ffffffff9b0ec1dd > torvalds#11 [ffff99650054fed0] vfs_write at ffffffff9b0eed35 > torvalds#12 [ffff99650054ff00] ksys_write at ffffffff9b0eefd9 > torvalds#13 [ffff99650054ff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315 > > the process holds the inode->i_rwsem for the file to which it's writing, > and is trying to __lock_page for the same page as in the other processes > > > the other tasks: > [0 00:00:00.028] [UN] PID: 8859 TASK: ffff8c6915479740 CPU: 2 > COMMAND: "reopen_file" > #0 [ffff9965007b39d8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095 > #1 [ffff9965007b3a68] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df > #2 [ffff9965007b3a78] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89 > #3 [ffff9965007b3af0] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9 > #4 [ffff9965007b3af8] cifs_new_fileinfo.cold.61 at ffffffffc0a42a07 [cifs] > #5 [ffff9965007b3b78] cifs_open at ffffffffc0a0709d [cifs] > #6 [ffff9965007b3cd8] do_dentry_open at ffffffff9b0e9b7a > #7 [ffff9965007b3d08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe34f > #8 [ffff9965007b3dd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33 > torvalds#9 [ffff9965007b3ee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6 > torvalds#10 [ffff9965007b3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315 > > this is opening the file, and is trying to down_write cinode->lock_sem > > > [0 00:00:00.041] [UN] PID: 8860 TASK: ffff8c691547ae80 CPU: 2 > COMMAND: "reopen_file" > [0 00:00:00.057] [UN] PID: 8861 TASK: ffff8c6915478000 CPU: 3 > COMMAND: "reopen_file" > [0 00:00:00.059] [UN] PID: 8858 TASK: ffff8c6914271740 CPU: 2 > COMMAND: "reopen_file" > [0 00:00:00.109] [UN] PID: 8862 TASK: ffff8c691547dd00 CPU: 6 > COMMAND: "reopen_file" > #0 [ffff9965007c3c78] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095 > #1 [ffff9965007c3d08] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df > #2 [ffff9965007c3d18] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89 > #3 [ffff9965007c3d90] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9 > #4 [ffff9965007c3d98] _cifsFileInfo_put.cold.63 at ffffffffc0a42dd6 [cifs] > #5 [ffff9965007c3e88] cifs_close at ffffffffc0a07aaf [cifs] > #6 [ffff9965007c3ea0] __fput at ffffffff9b0efa6e > #7 [ffff9965007c3ee8] task_work_run at ffffffff9aef1614 > #8 [ffff9965007c3f20] exit_to_usermode_loop at ffffffff9ae03d6f > torvalds#9 [ffff9965007c3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae0444c > > closing the file, and trying to down_write cifsi->lock_sem > > > [0 00:48:22.839] [UN] PID: 8857 TASK: ffff8c6914270000 CPU: 7 > COMMAND: "reopen_file" > #0 [ffff9965006a7cc8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095 > #1 [ffff9965006a7d58] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df > #2 [ffff9965006a7d68] io_schedule at ffffffff9b6e68e2 > #3 [ffff9965006a7d78] wait_on_page_bit at ffffffff9b03cac6 > #4 [ffff9965006a7e10] __filemap_fdatawait_range at ffffffff9b03b028 > #5 [ffff9965006a7ed8] filemap_write_and_wait at ffffffff9b040165 > #6 [ffff9965006a7ef0] cifs_flush at ffffffffc0a0c2fa [cifs] > #7 [ffff9965006a7f10] filp_close at ffffffff9b0e93f1 > #8 [ffff9965006a7f30] __x64_sys_close at ffffffff9b0e9a0e > torvalds#9 [ffff9965006a7f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315 > > in __filemap_fdatawait_range > wait_on_page_writeback(page); > for the same page of the file > > > > [0 00:48:22.718] [UN] PID: 8855 TASK: ffff8c69142745c0 CPU: 7 > COMMAND: "reopen_file" > #0 [ffff9965005dfc98] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095 > #1 [ffff9965005dfd28] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df > #2 [ffff9965005dfd38] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff9af283d7 > #3 [ffff9965005dfdf0] cifs_strict_writev at ffffffffc0a0c40a [cifs] > #4 [ffff9965005dfe48] new_sync_write at ffffffff9b0ec1dd > #5 [ffff9965005dfed0] vfs_write at ffffffff9b0eed35 > #6 [ffff9965005dff00] ksys_write at ffffffff9b0eefd9 > #7 [ffff9965005dff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315 > > inode_lock(inode); > > > and one 'ls' later on, to see whether the rest of the mount is available > (the test file is in the root, so we get blocked up on the directory > ->i_rwsem), so the entire mount is unavailable > > [0 00:36:26.473] [UN] PID: 9802 TASK: ffff8c691436ae80 CPU: 4 > COMMAND: "ls" > #0 [ffff996500393d28] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095 > #1 [ffff996500393db8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df > #2 [ffff996500393dc8] rwsem_down_read_slowpath at ffffffff9b6e9421 > #3 [ffff996500393e78] down_read_killable at ffffffff9b6e95e2 > #4 [ffff996500393e88] iterate_dir at ffffffff9b103c56 > #5 [ffff996500393ec8] ksys_getdents64 at ffffffff9b104b0c > #6 [ffff996500393f30] __x64_sys_getdents64 at ffffffff9b104bb6 > #7 [ffff996500393f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315 > > in iterate_dir: > if (shared) > res = down_read_killable(&inode->i_rwsem); <<<< > else > res = down_write_killable(&inode->i_rwsem); > Reported-by: Frank Sorenson <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit 5c9934b upstream. We got another syzbot report [1] that tells us we must use write_lock_irq()/write_unlock_irq() to avoid possible deadlock. [1] WARNING: inconsistent lock state 5.5.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Not tainted -------------------------------- inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-R} usage. syz-executor826/9605 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes: ffffffff8a128718 (disc_data_lock){+-..}, at: sp_get.isra.0+0x1d/0xf0 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_synctty.c:138 {HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: lock_acquire+0x190/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4485 __raw_write_lock_bh include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:203 [inline] _raw_write_lock_bh+0x33/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:319 sixpack_close+0x1d/0x250 drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c:657 tty_ldisc_close.isra.0+0x119/0x1a0 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:489 tty_set_ldisc+0x230/0x6b0 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:585 tiocsetd drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2337 [inline] tty_ioctl+0xe8d/0x14f0 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2597 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:47 [inline] file_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:545 [inline] do_vfs_ioctl+0x977/0x14e0 fs/ioctl.c:732 ksys_ioctl+0xab/0xd0 fs/ioctl.c:749 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:756 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:754 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:754 do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe irq event stamp: 3946 hardirqs last enabled at (3945): [<ffffffff87c86e43>] __raw_spin_unlock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:168 [inline] hardirqs last enabled at (3945): [<ffffffff87c86e43>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x23/0x80 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:199 hardirqs last disabled at (3946): [<ffffffff8100675f>] trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.S:42 softirqs last enabled at (2658): [<ffffffff86a8b4df>] spin_unlock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:383 [inline] softirqs last enabled at (2658): [<ffffffff86a8b4df>] clusterip_netdev_event+0x46f/0x670 net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_CLUSTERIP.c:222 softirqs last disabled at (2656): [<ffffffff86a8b22b>] spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:343 [inline] softirqs last disabled at (2656): [<ffffffff86a8b22b>] clusterip_netdev_event+0x1bb/0x670 net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_CLUSTERIP.c:196 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(disc_data_lock); <Interrupt> lock(disc_data_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by syz-executor826/9605: #0: ffff8880a905e198 (&tty->legacy_mutex){+.+.}, at: tty_lock+0xc7/0x130 drivers/tty/tty_mutex.c:19 #1: ffffffff899a56c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: mutex_spin_on_owner+0x0/0x330 kernel/locking/mutex.c:413 #2: ffff8880a496a2b0 (&(&i->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline] #2: ffff8880a496a2b0 (&(&i->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: serial8250_interrupt+0x2d/0x1a0 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c:116 #3: ffffffff8c104048 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}, at: serial8250_handle_irq.part.0+0x24/0x330 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1823 #4: ffff8880a905e090 (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}, at: tty_ldisc_ref+0x22/0x90 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:288 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 9605 Comm: syz-executor826 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x197/0x210 lib/dump_stack.c:118 print_usage_bug.cold+0x327/0x378 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3101 valid_state kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3112 [inline] mark_lock_irq kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3309 [inline] mark_lock+0xbb4/0x1220 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3666 mark_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3554 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x1e55/0x4a00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3909 lock_acquire+0x190/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4485 __raw_read_lock include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:149 [inline] _raw_read_lock+0x32/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:223 sp_get.isra.0+0x1d/0xf0 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_synctty.c:138 sixpack_write_wakeup+0x25/0x340 drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c:402 tty_wakeup+0xe9/0x120 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:536 tty_port_default_wakeup+0x2b/0x40 drivers/tty/tty_port.c:50 tty_port_tty_wakeup+0x57/0x70 drivers/tty/tty_port.c:387 uart_write_wakeup+0x46/0x70 drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:104 serial8250_tx_chars+0x495/0xaf0 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1761 serial8250_handle_irq.part.0+0x2a2/0x330 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1834 serial8250_handle_irq drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1820 [inline] serial8250_default_handle_irq+0xc0/0x150 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1850 serial8250_interrupt+0xf1/0x1a0 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c:126 __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x15d/0x970 kernel/irq/handle.c:149 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x74/0x160 kernel/irq/handle.c:189 handle_irq_event+0xa7/0x134 kernel/irq/handle.c:206 handle_edge_irq+0x25e/0x8d0 kernel/irq/chip.c:830 generic_handle_irq_desc include/linux/irqdesc.h:156 [inline] do_IRQ+0xde/0x280 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:250 common_interrupt+0xf/0xf arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:607 </IRQ> RIP: 0010:cpu_relax arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:685 [inline] RIP: 0010:mutex_spin_on_owner+0x247/0x330 kernel/locking/mutex.c:579 Code: c3 be 08 00 00 00 4c 89 e7 e8 e5 06 59 00 4c 89 e0 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 38 00 0f 85 e1 00 00 00 49 8b 04 24 a8 01 75 96 f3 90 <e9> 2f fe ff ff 0f 0b e8 0d 19 09 00 84 c0 0f 85 ff fd ff ff 48 c7 RSP: 0018:ffffc90001eafa20 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffd7 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88809fd9e0c0 RCX: 1ffffffff13266dd RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc90001eafa60 R08: 1ffff11013d22898 R09: ffffed1013d22899 R10: ffffed1013d22898 R11: ffff88809e9144c7 R12: ffff8880a905e138 R13: ffff88809e9144c0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 mutex_optimistic_spin kernel/locking/mutex.c:673 [inline] __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:962 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x32b/0x13c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1106 mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1121 tty_lock+0xc7/0x130 drivers/tty/tty_mutex.c:19 tty_release+0xb5/0xe90 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1665 __fput+0x2ff/0x890 fs/file_table.c:280 ____fput+0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:313 task_work_run+0x145/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:22 [inline] do_exit+0x8e7/0x2ef0 kernel/exit.c:797 do_group_exit+0x135/0x360 kernel/exit.c:895 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:904 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x44/0x50 kernel/exit.c:904 do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe RIP: 0033:0x43fef8 Code: Bad RIP value. RSP: 002b:00007ffdb07d2338 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000000043fef8 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000003c RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 00000000004bf730 R08: 00000000000000e7 R09: ffffffffffffffd0 R10: 00000000004002c8 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 00000000006d1180 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 Fixes: 6e4e2f8 ("6pack,mkiss: fix lock inconsistency") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> Reported-by: syzbot <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 158d583 ] Each AFS mountpoint has strings that define the target to be mounted. This is required to end in a dot that is supposed to be stripped off. The string can include suffixes of ".readonly" or ".backup" - which are supposed to come before the terminal dot. To add to the confusion, the "fs lsmount" afs utility does not show the terminal dot when displaying the string. The kernel mount source string parser, however, assumes that the terminal dot marks the suffix and that the suffix is always "" and is thus ignored. In most cases, there is no suffix and this is not a problem - but if there is a suffix, it is lost and this affects the ability to mount the correct volume. The command line mount command, on the other hand, is expected not to include a terminal dot - so the problem doesn't arise there. Fix this by making sure that the dot exists and then stripping it when passing the string to the mount configuration. Fixes: bec5eb6 ("AFS: Implement an autocell mount capability [ver #2]") Reported-by: Jonathan Billings <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <[email protected]> Tested-by: Jonathan Billings <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 08ad9a3 ] As we may signal a request and take the engine->active.lock within the signaler, the engine submission paths have to use a nested annotation on their requests -- but we guarantee that we can never submit on the same engine as the signaling fence. <4>[ 723.763281] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected <4>[ 723.763285] 5.3.0-g80fa0e042cdb-drmtip_379+ #1 Tainted: G U <4>[ 723.763288] ------------------------------------------------------ <4>[ 723.763291] gem_exec_await/1388 is trying to acquire lock: <4>[ 723.763294] ffff93a7b53221d8 (&engine->active.lock){..-.}, at: execlists_submit_request+0x2b/0x1e0 [i915] <4>[ 723.763378] but task is already holding lock: <4>[ 723.763381] ffff93a7c25f6d20 (&i915_request_get(rq)->submit/1){-.-.}, at: __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x1b2/0x250 [i915] <4>[ 723.763420] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4>[ 723.763423] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4>[ 723.763427] -> #2 (&i915_request_get(rq)->submit/1){-.-.}: <4>[ 723.763434] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave_nested+0x39/0x50 <4>[ 723.763478] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x1b2/0x250 [i915] <4>[ 723.763513] intel_engine_breadcrumbs_irq+0x3aa/0x5e0 [i915] <4>[ 723.763600] cs_irq_handler+0x49/0x50 [i915] <4>[ 723.763659] gen11_gt_irq_handler+0x17b/0x280 [i915] <4>[ 723.763690] gen11_irq_handler+0x54/0xf0 [i915] <4>[ 723.763695] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x41/0x2d0 <4>[ 723.763699] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x2b/0x70 <4>[ 723.763702] handle_irq_event+0x2f/0x50 <4>[ 723.763706] handle_edge_irq+0xee/0x1a0 <4>[ 723.763709] do_IRQ+0x7e/0x160 <4>[ 723.763712] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d <4>[ 723.763717] __slab_alloc.isra.28.constprop.33+0x4f/0x70 <4>[ 723.763720] kmem_cache_alloc+0x28d/0x2f0 <4>[ 723.763724] vm_area_dup+0x15/0x40 <4>[ 723.763727] dup_mm+0x2dd/0x550 <4>[ 723.763730] copy_process+0xf21/0x1ef0 <4>[ 723.763734] _do_fork+0x71/0x670 <4>[ 723.763737] __se_sys_clone+0x6e/0xa0 <4>[ 723.763741] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210 <4>[ 723.763744] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4>[ 723.763747] -> #1 (&(&rq->lock)->rlock#2){-.-.}: <4>[ 723.763752] _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 <4>[ 723.763789] __unwind_incomplete_requests+0x3eb/0x450 [i915] <4>[ 723.763825] __execlists_submission_tasklet+0x9ec/0x1d60 [i915] <4>[ 723.763864] execlists_submission_tasklet+0x34/0x50 [i915] <4>[ 723.763874] tasklet_action_common.isra.5+0x47/0xb0 <4>[ 723.763878] __do_softirq+0xd8/0x4ae <4>[ 723.763881] irq_exit+0xa9/0xc0 <4>[ 723.763883] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0xb7/0x280 <4>[ 723.763887] apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 <4>[ 723.763892] cpuidle_enter_state+0xae/0x450 <4>[ 723.763895] cpuidle_enter+0x24/0x40 <4>[ 723.763899] do_idle+0x1e7/0x250 <4>[ 723.763902] cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20 <4>[ 723.763905] start_secondary+0x15f/0x1b0 <4>[ 723.763908] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 <4>[ 723.763911] -> #0 (&engine->active.lock){..-.}: <4>[ 723.763916] __lock_acquire+0x15d8/0x1ea0 <4>[ 723.763919] lock_acquire+0xa6/0x1c0 <4>[ 723.763922] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x33/0x50 <4>[ 723.763956] execlists_submit_request+0x2b/0x1e0 [i915] <4>[ 723.764002] submit_notify+0xa8/0x13c [i915] <4>[ 723.764035] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x81/0x250 [i915] <4>[ 723.764054] i915_sw_fence_wake+0x51/0x64 [i915] <4>[ 723.764054] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x1ee/0x250 [i915] <4>[ 723.764054] dma_i915_sw_fence_wake_timer+0x14/0x20 [i915] <4>[ 723.764054] dma_fence_signal_locked+0x9e/0x1c0 <4>[ 723.764054] dma_fence_signal+0x1f/0x40 <4>[ 723.764054] vgem_fence_signal_ioctl+0x67/0xc0 [vgem] <4>[ 723.764054] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x83/0xf0 <4>[ 723.764054] drm_ioctl+0x2f3/0x3b0 <4>[ 723.764054] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa0/0x6f0 <4>[ 723.764054] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x60 <4>[ 723.764054] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20 <4>[ 723.764054] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210 <4>[ 723.764054] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4>[ 723.764054] other info that might help us debug this: <4>[ 723.764054] Chain exists of: &engine->active.lock --> &(&rq->lock)->rlock#2 --> &i915_request_get(rq)->submit/1 <4>[ 723.764054] Possible unsafe locking scenario: <4>[ 723.764054] CPU0 CPU1 <4>[ 723.764054] ---- ---- <4>[ 723.764054] lock(&i915_request_get(rq)->submit/1); <4>[ 723.764054] lock(&(&rq->lock)->rlock#2); <4>[ 723.764054] lock(&i915_request_get(rq)->submit/1); <4>[ 723.764054] lock(&engine->active.lock); <4>[ 723.764054] *** DEADLOCK *** Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111862 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 11bde98 ] Check for overflow in addition before checking for end-of-block-device. Steps to reproduce: #define _GNU_SOURCE 1 #include <sys/ioctl.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> typedef unsigned long long __u64; struct blk_zone_range { __u64 sector; __u64 nr_sectors; }; #define BLKRESETZONE _IOW(0x12, 131, struct blk_zone_range) int main(void) { int fd = open("/dev/nullb0", O_RDWR|O_DIRECT); struct blk_zone_range zr = {4096, 0xfffffffffffff000ULL}; ioctl(fd, BLKRESETZONE, &zr); return 0; } BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in submit_bio_wait+0x74/0xe0 Write of size 8 at addr 0000000000000040 by task a.out/1590 CPU: 8 PID: 1590 Comm: a.out Not tainted 5.6.0-rc1-00019-g359c92c02bfa #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190711_202441-buildvm-armv7-10.arm.fedoraproject.org-2.fc31 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x76/0xa0 __kasan_report.cold+0x5/0x3e kasan_report+0xe/0x20 submit_bio_wait+0x74/0xe0 blkdev_zone_mgmt+0x26f/0x2a0 blkdev_zone_mgmt_ioctl+0x14b/0x1b0 blkdev_ioctl+0xb28/0xe60 block_ioctl+0x69/0x80 ksys_ioctl+0x3af/0xa50 Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan (SK hynix) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

…dency [ Upstream commit 7809f70 ] On a very heavily loaded D05 with GICv4, I managed to trigger the following lockdep splat: [ 6022.598864] ====================================================== [ 6022.605031] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 6022.611200] 5.6.0-rc4-00026-geee7c7b0f498 torvalds#680 Tainted: G E [ 6022.618061] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 6022.624227] qemu-system-aar/7569 is trying to acquire lock: [ 6022.629789] ffff042f97606808 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}, at: try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0 [ 6022.637102] [ 6022.637102] but task is already holding lock: [ 6022.642921] ffff002fae424cf0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98 [ 6022.651350] [ 6022.651350] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 6022.651350] [ 6022.659512] [ 6022.659512] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 6022.666980] [ 6022.666980] -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}: [ 6022.672983] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78 [ 6022.677848] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98 [ 6022.682453] irq_set_vcpu_affinity+0x40/0xc0 [ 6022.687236] its_make_vpe_non_resident+0x6c/0xb8 [ 6022.692364] vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70 [ 6022.696273] vgic_v3_put+0x20/0xd8 [ 6022.700183] kvm_vgic_put+0x30/0x48 [ 6022.704182] kvm_arch_vcpu_put+0x34/0x50 [ 6022.708614] kvm_sched_out+0x34/0x50 [ 6022.712700] __schedule+0x4bc/0x7f8 [ 6022.716697] schedule+0x50/0xd8 [ 6022.720347] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x5f0/0x978 [ 6022.725473] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8 [ 6022.729820] ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0 [ 6022.733642] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.738074] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8 [ 6022.743373] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6022.747198] el0_svc+0x14/0x40 [ 6022.750761] el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8 [ 6022.755278] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6022.759100] [ 6022.759100] -> #1 (&rq->lock){-.-.}: [ 6022.764143] _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50 [ 6022.768314] task_fork_fair+0x40/0x128 [ 6022.772572] sched_fork+0xe0/0x210 [ 6022.776484] copy_process+0x8c4/0x18d8 [ 6022.780742] _do_fork+0x88/0x6d8 [ 6022.784478] kernel_thread+0x64/0x88 [ 6022.788563] rest_init+0x30/0x270 [ 6022.792390] arch_call_rest_init+0x14/0x1c [ 6022.796995] start_kernel+0x498/0x4c4 [ 6022.801164] [ 6022.801164] -> #0 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}: [ 6022.806382] __lock_acquire+0xdd8/0x15c8 [ 6022.810813] lock_acquire+0xd0/0x218 [ 6022.814896] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78 [ 6022.819761] try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0 [ 6022.824018] wake_up_process+0x1c/0x28 [ 6022.828276] wakeup_softirqd+0x38/0x40 [ 6022.832533] __tasklet_schedule_common+0xc4/0xf0 [ 6022.837658] __tasklet_schedule+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.842176] check_irq_resend+0xc8/0x158 [ 6022.846609] irq_startup+0x74/0x128 [ 6022.850606] __enable_irq+0x6c/0x78 [ 6022.854602] enable_irq+0x54/0xa0 [ 6022.858431] its_make_vpe_non_resident+0xa4/0xb8 [ 6022.863557] vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70 [ 6022.867469] kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking+0x28/0x38 [ 6022.872336] kvm_vcpu_block+0x48/0x490 [ 6022.876594] kvm_handle_wfx+0x18c/0x310 [ 6022.880938] handle_exit+0x138/0x198 [ 6022.885022] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x4d4/0x978 [ 6022.890148] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8 [ 6022.894494] ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0 [ 6022.898317] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.902748] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8 [ 6022.908046] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6022.911871] el0_svc+0x14/0x40 [ 6022.915434] el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8 [ 6022.919951] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6022.923773] [ 6022.923773] other info that might help us debug this: [ 6022.923773] [ 6022.931762] Chain exists of: [ 6022.931762] &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock --> &irq_desc_lock_class [ 6022.931762] [ 6022.942101] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 6022.942101] [ 6022.948007] CPU0 CPU1 [ 6022.952523] ---- ---- [ 6022.957039] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 6022.961036] lock(&rq->lock); [ 6022.966595] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 6022.973109] lock(&p->pi_lock); [ 6022.976324] [ 6022.976324] *** DEADLOCK *** This is happening because we have a pending doorbell that requires retrigger. As SW retriggering is done in a tasklet, we trigger the circular dependency above. The easy cop-out is to provide a retrigger callback that doesn't require acquiring any extra lock. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit f0cc2cd upstream. During unmount we can have a job from the delayed inode items work queue still running, that can lead to at least two bad things: 1) A crash, because the worker can try to create a transaction just after the fs roots were freed; 2) A transaction leak, because the worker can create a transaction before the fs roots are freed and just after we committed the last transaction and after we stopped the transaction kthread. A stack trace example of the crash: [79011.691214] kernel BUG at lib/radix-tree.c:982! [79011.692056] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [79011.693180] CPU: 3 PID: 1394 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Tainted: G W 5.6.0-rc2-btrfs-next-54 #2 (...) [79011.696789] Workqueue: btrfs-delayed-meta btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [79011.697904] RIP: 0010:radix_tree_tag_set+0xe7/0x170 (...) [79011.702014] RSP: 0018:ffffb3c84a317ca0 EFLAGS: 00010293 [79011.702949] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [79011.704202] RDX: ffffb3c84a317cb0 RSI: ffffb3c84a317ca8 RDI: ffff8db3931340a0 [79011.705463] RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: ffffffff974629d0 [79011.706756] R10: ffffb3c84a317bc0 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8db393134000 [79011.708010] R13: ffff8db3931340a0 R14: ffff8db393134068 R15: 0000000000000001 [79011.709270] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8db3b6a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [79011.710699] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [79011.711710] CR2: 00007f22c2a0a000 CR3: 0000000232ad4005 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [79011.712958] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [79011.714205] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [79011.715448] Call Trace: [79011.715925] record_root_in_trans+0x72/0xf0 [btrfs] [79011.716819] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x4b/0x70 [btrfs] [79011.717925] start_transaction+0xdd/0x5c0 [btrfs] [79011.718829] btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x17e/0x2b0 [btrfs] [79011.719915] btrfs_work_helper+0xaa/0x720 [btrfs] [79011.720773] process_one_work+0x26d/0x6a0 [79011.721497] worker_thread+0x4f/0x3e0 [79011.722153] ? process_one_work+0x6a0/0x6a0 [79011.722901] kthread+0x103/0x140 [79011.723481] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [79011.724379] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 (...) The following diagram shows a sequence of steps that lead to the crash during ummount of the filesystem: CPU 1 CPU 2 CPU 3 btrfs_punch_hole() btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() btrfs_balance_delayed_items() --> sees fs_info->delayed_root->items with value 200, which is greater than BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND (128) and smaller than BTRFS_DELAYED_WRITEBACK (512) btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node() --> queues a job for fs_info->delayed_workers to run btrfs_async_run_delayed_root() btrfs_async_run_delayed_root() --> job queued by CPU 1 --> starts picking and running delayed nodes from the prepare_list list close_ctree() btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() btrfs_commit_super() btrfs_join_transaction() --> gets transaction N btrfs_commit_transaction(N) --> set transaction state to TRANTS_STATE_COMMIT_START btrfs_first_prepared_delayed_node() --> picks delayed node X through the prepared_list list btrfs_run_delayed_items() btrfs_first_delayed_node() --> also picks delayed node X but through the node_list list __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items() --> runs all delayed items from this node and drops the node's item count to 0 through call to btrfs_release_delayed_inode() --> finishes running any remaining delayed nodes --> finishes transaction commit --> stops cleaner and transaction threads btrfs_free_fs_roots() --> frees all roots and removes them from the radix tree fs_info->fs_roots_radix btrfs_join_transaction() start_transaction() btrfs_record_root_in_trans() record_root_in_trans() radix_tree_tag_set() --> crashes because the root is not in the radix tree anymore If the worker is able to call btrfs_join_transaction() before the unmount task frees the fs roots, we end up leaking a transaction and all its resources, since after the call to btrfs_commit_super() and stopping the transaction kthread, we don't expect to have any transaction open anymore. When this situation happens the worker has a delayed node that has no more items to run, since the task calling btrfs_run_delayed_items(), which is doing a transaction commit, picks the same node and runs all its items first. We can not wait for the worker to complete when running delayed items through btrfs_run_delayed_items(), because we call that function in several phases of a transaction commit, and that could cause a deadlock because the worker calls btrfs_join_transaction() and the task doing the transaction commit may have already set the transaction state to TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING. Also it's not possible to get into a situation where only some of the items of a delayed node are added to the fs/subvolume tree in the current transaction and the remaining ones in the next transaction, because when running the items of a delayed inode we lock its mutex, effectively waiting for the worker if the worker is running the items of the delayed node already. Since this can only cause issues when unmounting a filesystem, fix it in a simple way by waiting for any jobs on the delayed workers queue before calling btrfs_commit_supper() at close_ctree(). This works because at this point no one can call btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() or btrfs_balance_delayed_items(), and if we end up waiting for any worker to complete, btrfs_commit_super() will commit the transaction created by the worker. CC: [email protected] # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit 351cbf6 upstream. Zygo reported the following lockdep splat while testing the balance patches ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ #53 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/1133 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888092f622c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.91+0x29/0x30 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x19/0x20 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x32/0x740 add_block_entry+0x45/0x260 btrfs_ref_tree_mod+0x6e2/0x8b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x789/0x880 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0xc6/0xf0 __btrfs_cow_block+0x270/0x940 btrfs_cow_block+0x1ba/0x3a0 btrfs_search_slot+0x999/0x1030 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x81/0xe0 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x128/0x7d0 __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0xf4/0x2a0 btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13/0x20 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x5cc/0x1390 insert_balance_item.isra.39+0x6b2/0x6e0 btrfs_balance+0x72d/0x18d0 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3de/0x4c0 btrfs_ioctl+0x30ab/0x44a0 ksys_ioctl+0xa1/0xe0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x77/0x2c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}: __lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550 lock_acquire+0x103/0x220 __mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50 btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900 evict+0x19a/0x2c0 dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0 prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0 super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250 do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530 shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410 shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0 balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0 kswapd+0x35a/0x800 kthread+0x1e9/0x210 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/1133: #0: ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8fc380d8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}, at: shrink_slab+0x1e8/0x410 #2: ffff8881e0e6c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#42){++++}, at: trylock_super+0x1b/0x70 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1133 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ #53 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xc1/0x11a print_circular_bug.isra.38.cold.57+0x145/0x14a check_noncircular+0x2a9/0x2f0 ? print_circular_bug.isra.38+0x130/0x130 ? stack_trace_consume_entry+0x90/0x90 ? save_trace+0x3cc/0x420 __lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550 ? btrfs_inode_clear_file_extent_range+0x9b/0xb0 ? register_lock_class+0x960/0x960 lock_acquire+0x103/0x220 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 __mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 ? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20 ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0xeb/0x190 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0xc20/0xc20 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? check_chain_key+0x1e6/0x2e0 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50 btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900 ? btrfs_setattr+0x840/0x840 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140 evict+0x19a/0x2c0 dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0 prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0 ? invalidate_inodes+0x310/0x310 super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250 do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530 shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410 ? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530 ? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? mem_cgroup_protected+0x13d/0x260 shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0 balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0 ? mem_cgroup_shrink_node+0x490/0x490 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x40 ? finish_task_switch+0xce/0x390 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0 kswapd+0x35a/0x800 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4c/0x60 ? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0 ? finish_wait+0x110/0x110 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? __kthread_parkme+0xc6/0xe0 ? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0 kthread+0x1e9/0x210 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 This is because we hold that delayed node's mutex while doing tree operations. Fix this by just wrapping the searches in nofs. CC: [email protected] # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit 28936b6 upstream. inode->i_blocks could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN, BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ext4_do_update_inode [ext4] / inode_add_bytes write to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 22100 on cpu 118: inode_add_bytes+0x65/0xf0 __inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:689 (inlined by) inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:702 ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x418/0xca0 [ext4] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1a6b/0x27b0 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x1a9/0x950 [ext4] _ext4_get_block+0xfc/0x270 [ext4] ext4_get_block_unwritten+0x33/0x50 [ext4] __block_write_begin_int+0x22e/0xae0 __block_write_begin+0x39/0x50 ext4_write_begin+0x388/0xb50 [ext4] ext4_da_write_begin+0x35f/0x8f0 [ext4] generic_perform_write+0x15d/0x290 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4] ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4] new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0 __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0 vfs_write+0x103/0x260 ksys_write+0x9d/0x130 __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe read to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 8 on cpu 65: ext4_do_update_inode+0x4a0/0xf60 [ext4] ext4_inode_blocks_set at fs/ext4/inode.c:4815 ext4_mark_iloc_dirty+0xaf/0x160 [ext4] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x129/0x3e0 [ext4] ext4_convert_unwritten_extents+0x253/0x2d0 [ext4] ext4_convert_unwritten_io_end_vec+0xc5/0x150 [ext4] ext4_end_io_rsv_work+0x22c/0x350 [ext4] process_one_work+0x54f/0xb90 worker_thread+0x80/0x5f0 kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 4 locks held by kworker/u256:0/8: #0: ffff9a025abc4328 ((wq_completion)ext4-rsv-conversion){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90 #1: ffffab5a862dbe20 ((work_completion)(&ei->i_rsv_conversion_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90 #2: ffff9a025a9d0f58 (jbd2_handle){++++}, at: start_this_handle+0x1c1/0x9d0 [jbd2] #3: ffff9a00d4b985d8 (&(&ei->i_raw_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: ext4_do_update_inode+0xaa/0xf60 [ext4] irq event stamp: 3009267 hardirqs last enabled at (3009267): [<ffffffff980da9b7>] __find_get_block+0x107/0x790 hardirqs last disabled at (3009266): [<ffffffff980da8f9>] __find_get_block+0x49/0x790 softirqs last enabled at (3009230): [<ffffffff98a0034c>] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x57c softirqs last disabled at (3009223): [<ffffffff97cc67a2>] irq_exit+0xa2/0xc0 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 65 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u256:0 Tainted: G L 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200221+ #7 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019 Workqueue: ext4-rsv-conversion ext4_end_io_rsv_work [ext4] The plain read is outside of inode->i_lock critical section which results in a data race. Fix it by adding READ_ONCE() there. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit a866759 ] This reverts commit 64e62bd. This commit ends up causing some lockdep splats due to trying to grab the payload lock while holding the mgr's lock: [ 54.010099] [ 54.011765] ====================================================== [ 54.018670] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 54.025577] 5.5.0-rc6-02274-g77381c23ee63 torvalds#47 Not tainted [ 54.031610] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 54.038516] kworker/1:6/1040 is trying to acquire lock: [ 54.044354] ffff888272af3228 (&mgr->payload_lock){+.+.}, at: drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.054957] [ 54.054957] but task is already holding lock: [ 54.061473] ffff888272af3060 (&mgr->lock){+.+.}, at: drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x3c/0x2e4 [ 54.071193] [ 54.071193] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 54.071193] [ 54.080334] [ 54.080334] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 54.088697] [ 54.088697] -> #1 (&mgr->lock){+.+.}: [ 54.094440] __mutex_lock+0xc3/0x498 [ 54.099015] drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated+0x25/0x80 [ 54.106018] drm_dp_update_payload_part1+0xa2/0x2e2 [ 54.112051] intel_mst_pre_enable_dp+0x144/0x18f [ 54.117791] intel_encoders_pre_enable+0x63/0x70 [ 54.123532] hsw_crtc_enable+0xa1/0x722 [ 54.128396] intel_update_crtc+0x50/0x194 [ 54.133455] skl_commit_modeset_enables+0x40c/0x540 [ 54.139485] intel_atomic_commit_tail+0x5f7/0x130d [ 54.145418] intel_atomic_commit+0x2c8/0x2d8 [ 54.150770] drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x5a/0x70 [ 54.156801] drm_mode_setcrtc+0x2ab/0x833 [ 54.161862] drm_ioctl+0x2e5/0x424 [ 54.166242] vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x2f [ 54.170426] do_vfs_ioctl+0x5fb/0x61e [ 54.175096] ksys_ioctl+0x55/0x75 [ 54.179377] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x1e [ 54.184146] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x6d [ 54.188721] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 54.194946] [ 54.194946] -> #0 (&mgr->payload_lock){+.+.}: [ 54.201463] [ 54.201463] other info that might help us debug this: [ 54.201463] [ 54.210410] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 54.210410] [ 54.217025] CPU0 CPU1 [ 54.222082] ---- ---- [ 54.227138] lock(&mgr->lock); [ 54.230643] lock(&mgr->payload_lock); [ 54.237742] lock(&mgr->lock); [ 54.244062] lock(&mgr->payload_lock); [ 54.248346] [ 54.248346] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 54.248346] [ 54.254959] 7 locks held by kworker/1:6/1040: [ 54.259822] #0: ffff888275c4f528 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: worker_thread+0x455/0x6e2 [ 54.269451] #1: ffffc9000119beb0 ((work_completion)(&(&dev_priv->hotplug.hotplug_work)->work)){+.+.}, at: worker_thread+0x455/0x6e2 [ 54.282768] #2: ffff888272a403f0 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}, at: i915_hotplug_work_func+0x4b/0x2be [ 54.293368] #3: ffffffff824fc6c0 (drm_connector_list_iter){.+.+}, at: i915_hotplug_work_func+0x17e/0x2be [ 54.304061] #4: ffffc9000119bc58 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}, at: drm_helper_probe_detect_ctx+0x40/0xfd [ 54.314855] #5: ffff888272a40470 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}, at: drm_modeset_lock+0x74/0xe2 [ 54.324385] #6: ffff888272af3060 (&mgr->lock){+.+.}, at: drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x3c/0x2e4 [ 54.334597] [ 54.334597] stack backtrace: [ 54.339464] CPU: 1 PID: 1040 Comm: kworker/1:6 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc6-02274-g77381c23ee63 torvalds#47 [ 54.348893] Hardware name: Google Fizz/Fizz, BIOS Google_Fizz.10139.39.0 01/04/2018 [ 54.357451] Workqueue: events i915_hotplug_work_func [ 54.362995] Call Trace: [ 54.365724] dump_stack+0x71/0x9c [ 54.369427] check_noncircular+0x91/0xbc [ 54.373809] ? __lock_acquire+0xc9e/0xf66 [ 54.378286] ? __lock_acquire+0xc9e/0xf66 [ 54.382763] ? lock_acquire+0x175/0x1ac [ 54.387048] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.393177] ? __mutex_lock+0xc3/0x498 [ 54.397362] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.403492] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.409620] ? drm_dp_dpcd_access+0xd9/0x101 [ 54.414390] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.420517] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.426645] ? intel_digital_port_connected+0x34d/0x35c [ 54.432482] ? intel_dp_detect+0x227/0x44e [ 54.437056] ? ww_mutex_lock+0x49/0x9a [ 54.441242] ? drm_helper_probe_detect_ctx+0x75/0xfd [ 54.446789] ? intel_encoder_hotplug+0x4b/0x97 [ 54.451752] ? intel_ddi_hotplug+0x61/0x2e0 [ 54.456423] ? mark_held_locks+0x53/0x68 [ 54.460803] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3a/0x51 [ 54.466347] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x187/0x1a4 [ 54.471310] ? drm_connector_list_iter_next+0x89/0x9a [ 54.476953] ? i915_hotplug_work_func+0x206/0x2be [ 54.482208] ? worker_thread+0x4d5/0x6e2 [ 54.486587] ? worker_thread+0x455/0x6e2 [ 54.490966] ? queue_work_on+0x64/0x64 [ 54.495151] ? kthread+0x1e9/0x1f1 [ 54.498946] ? queue_work_on+0x64/0x64 [ 54.503130] ? kthread_unpark+0x5e/0x5e [ 54.507413] ? ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 The proper fix for this is probably cleanup the VCPI allocations when we're enabling the topology, or on the first payload allocation. For now though, let's just revert. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> Fixes: 64e62bd ("drm/dp_mst: Remove VCPI while disabling topology mgr") Cc: Sean Paul <[email protected]> Cc: Wayne Lin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 696ac2e ] Similar to commit 0266d81 ("acpi/processor: Prevent cpu hotplug deadlock") except this is for acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe(): "The problem is that the work is scheduled on the current CPU from the hotplug thread associated with that CPU. It's not required to invoke these functions via the workqueue because the hotplug thread runs on the target CPU already. Check whether current is a per cpu thread pinned on the target CPU and invoke the function directly to avoid the workqueue." WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected ------------------------------------------------------ cpuhp/1/15 is trying to acquire lock: ffffc90003447a28 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x4c6/0x630 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: cpus_read_lock+0x3e/0xc0 irq_calc_affinity_vectors+0x5f/0x91 __pci_enable_msix_range+0x10f/0x9a0 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity+0x13e/0x1f0 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity at drivers/pci/msi.c:1208 pqi_ctrl_init+0x72f/0x1618 [smartpqi] pqi_pci_probe.cold.63+0x882/0x892 [smartpqi] local_pci_probe+0x7a/0xc0 work_for_cpu_fn+0x2e/0x50 process_one_work+0x57e/0xb90 worker_thread+0x363/0x5b0 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&wfc.work) --> cpuhp_state-up --> cpuidle_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(cpuidle_lock); lock(cpuhp_state-up); lock(cpuidle_lock); lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by cpuhp/1/15: #0: ffffffffaf51ab10 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0 #1: ffffffffaf51ad40 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0 #2: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xa0/0xea print_circular_bug.cold.52+0x147/0x14c check_noncircular+0x295/0x2d0 __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> [ rjw: Subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit d3ec10a upstream. A lockdep circular locking dependency report was seen when running a keyutils test: [12537.027242] ====================================================== [12537.059309] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [12537.088148] 4.18.0-147.7.1.el8_1.x86_64+debug #1 Tainted: G OE --------- - - [12537.125253] ------------------------------------------------------ [12537.153189] keyctl/25598 is trying to acquire lock: [12537.175087] 000000007c39f96c (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12537.208365] [12537.208365] but task is already holding lock: [12537.234507] 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12537.270476] [12537.270476] which lock already depends on the new lock. [12537.270476] [12537.307209] [12537.307209] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [12537.340754] [12537.340754] -> #3 (&type->lock_class){++++}: [12537.367434] down_write+0x4d/0x110 [12537.385202] __key_link_begin+0x87/0x280 [12537.405232] request_key_and_link+0x483/0xf70 [12537.427221] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.444839] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.468445] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.496731] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.519418] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.546263] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.573551] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.601045] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.617906] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.636225] [12537.636225] -> #2 (root_key_user.cons_lock){+.+.}: [12537.664525] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.683734] request_key_and_link+0x35a/0xf70 [12537.705640] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.723304] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.746773] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.775607] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.798322] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.823369] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.847262] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.873477] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.890281] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.908649] [12537.908649] -> #1 (&tcp_ses->srv_mutex){+.+.}: [12537.935225] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.954450] cifs_call_async+0x102/0x7f0 [cifs] [12537.977250] smb2_async_readv+0x6c3/0xc90 [cifs] [12538.000659] cifs_readpages+0x120a/0x1e50 [cifs] [12538.023920] read_pages+0xf5/0x560 [12538.041583] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x41d/0x4b0 [12538.067047] ondemand_readahead+0x44c/0xc10 [12538.092069] filemap_fault+0xec1/0x1830 [12538.111637] __do_fault+0x82/0x260 [12538.129216] do_fault+0x419/0xfb0 [12538.146390] __handle_mm_fault+0x862/0xdf0 [12538.167408] handle_mm_fault+0x154/0x550 [12538.187401] __do_page_fault+0x42f/0xa60 [12538.207395] do_page_fault+0x38/0x5e0 [12538.225777] page_fault+0x1e/0x30 [12538.243010] [12538.243010] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: [12538.267875] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12538.286848] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12538.306006] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12538.327936] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12538.352154] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12538.370558] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12538.391470] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12538.410511] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf [12538.435535] [12538.435535] other info that might help us debug this: [12538.435535] [12538.472829] Chain exists of: [12538.472829] &mm->mmap_sem --> root_key_user.cons_lock --> &type->lock_class [12538.472829] [12538.524820] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [12538.524820] [12538.551431] CPU0 CPU1 [12538.572654] ---- ---- [12538.595865] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.613737] lock(root_key_user.cons_lock); [12538.644234] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.672410] lock(&mm->mmap_sem); [12538.687758] [12538.687758] *** DEADLOCK *** [12538.687758] [12538.714455] 1 lock held by keyctl/25598: [12538.732097] #0: 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12538.770573] [12538.770573] stack backtrace: [12538.790136] CPU: 2 PID: 25598 Comm: keyctl Kdump: loaded Tainted: G [12538.844855] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9/ProLiant DL360 Gen9, BIOS P89 12/27/2015 [12538.881963] Call Trace: [12538.892897] dump_stack+0x9a/0xf0 [12538.907908] print_circular_bug.isra.25.cold.50+0x1bc/0x279 [12538.932891] ? save_trace+0xd6/0x250 [12538.948979] check_prev_add.constprop.32+0xc36/0x14f0 [12538.971643] ? keyring_compare_object+0x104/0x190 [12538.992738] ? check_usage+0x550/0x550 [12539.009845] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 [12539.025484] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x1e0 [12539.043555] __lock_acquire+0x1f12/0x38d0 [12539.061551] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x10/0x10 [12539.080554] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12539.100330] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.119079] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12539.135869] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.153234] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12539.172787] ? keyring_read+0x110/0x110 [12539.190059] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12539.211526] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12539.227561] ? keyring_gc_check_iterator+0xc0/0xc0 [12539.249076] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12539.266660] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12539.283091] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf One way to prevent this deadlock scenario from happening is to not allow writing to userspace while holding the key semaphore. Instead, an internal buffer is allocated for getting the keys out from the read method first before copying them out to userspace without holding the lock. That requires taking out the __user modifier from all the relevant read methods as well as additional changes to not use any userspace write helpers. That is, 1) The put_user() call is replaced by a direct copy. 2) The copy_to_user() call is replaced by memcpy(). 3) All the fault handling code is removed. Compiling on a x86-64 system, the size of the rxrpc_read() function is reduced from 3795 bytes to 2384 bytes with this patch. Fixes: ^1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit 056ad39 upstream. FuzzUSB (a variant of syzkaller) found a free-while-still-in-use bug in the USB scatter-gather library: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in atomic_read include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:26 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x5f/0x170 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1607 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888065379610 by task kworker/u4:1/27 CPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 5.5.11 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: scsi_tmf_2 scmd_eh_abort_handler Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0xce/0x128 lib/dump_stack.c:118 print_address_description.constprop.4+0x21/0x3c0 mm/kasan/report.c:374 __kasan_report+0x153/0x1cb mm/kasan/report.c:506 kasan_report+0x12/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:639 check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:185 [inline] check_memory_region+0x152/0x1b0 mm/kasan/generic.c:192 __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:95 atomic_read include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:26 [inline] usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x5f/0x170 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1607 usb_unlink_urb+0x72/0xb0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:657 usb_sg_cancel+0x14e/0x290 drivers/usb/core/message.c:602 usb_stor_stop_transport+0x5e/0xa0 drivers/usb/storage/transport.c:937 This bug occurs when cancellation of the S-G transfer races with transfer completion. When that happens, usb_sg_cancel() may continue to access the transfer's URBs after usb_sg_wait() has freed them. The bug is caused by the fact that usb_sg_cancel() does not take any sort of reference to the transfer, and so there is nothing to prevent the URBs from being deallocated while the routine is trying to use them. The fix is to take such a reference by incrementing the transfer's io->count field while the cancellation is in progres and decrementing it afterward. The transfer's URBs are not deallocated until io->complete is triggered, which happens when io->count reaches zero. Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <[email protected]> Reported-and-tested-by: Kyungtae Kim <[email protected]> CC: <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

…f fs_info::journal_info commit fcc9973 upstream. [BUG] One run of btrfs/063 triggered the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ torvalds#48 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/u24:0/7 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(sb_internal#2); lock(sb_internal#2); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by kworker/u24:0/7: #0: ffff88817b495948 ((wq_completion)btrfs-endio-write){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80 #1: ffff888189ea7db8 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80 #2: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] #3: ffff888174ca4da8 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}, at: btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x83/0xd0 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ torvalds#48 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] Call Trace: dump_stack+0xc2/0x11a __lock_acquire.cold+0xce/0x214 lock_acquire+0xe6/0x210 __sb_start_write+0x14e/0x290 start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] find_free_extent+0x1504/0x1a50 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd5/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x1ac/0x570 [btrfs] btrfs_copy_root+0x213/0x580 [btrfs] create_reloc_root+0x3bd/0x470 [btrfs] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2d2/0x310 [btrfs] record_root_in_trans+0x191/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x90/0xd0 [btrfs] start_transaction+0x16e/0x890 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x55d/0xcd0 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0x116/0x9a0 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x632/0xb80 worker_thread+0x80/0x690 kthread+0x1a3/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 It's pretty hard to reproduce, only one hit so far. [CAUSE] This is because we're calling btrfs_join_transaction() without re-using the current running one: btrfs_finish_ordered_io() |- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #1 |- btrfs_record_root_in_trans() |- btrfs_reserve_extent() |- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #2 Normally such btrfs_join_transaction() call should re-use the existing one, without trying to re-start a transaction. But the problem is, in btrfs_join_transaction() call #1, we call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() before initializing current::journal_info. And in btrfs_join_transaction() call #2, we're relying on current::journal_info to avoid such deadlock. [FIX] Call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() after we have initialized current::journal_info. CC: [email protected] # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit 0b80f98 upstream. abs_vdebt is an atomic_64 which tracks how much over budget a given cgroup is and controls the activation of use_delay mechanism. Once a cgroup goes over budget from forced IOs, it has to pay it back with its future budget. The progress guarantee on debt paying comes from the iocg being active - active iocgs are processed by the periodic timer, which ensures that as time passes the debts dissipate and the iocg returns to normal operation. However, both iocg activation and vdebt handling are asynchronous and a sequence like the following may happen. 1. The iocg is in the process of being deactivated by the periodic timer. 2. A bio enters ioc_rqos_throttle(), calls iocg_activate() which returns without anything because it still sees that the iocg is already active. 3. The iocg is deactivated. 4. The bio from #2 is over budget but needs to be forced. It increases abs_vdebt and goes over the threshold and enables use_delay. 5. IO control is enabled for the iocg's subtree and now IOs are attributed to the descendant cgroups and the iocg itself no longer issues IOs. This leaves the iocg with stuck abs_vdebt - it has debt but inactive and no further IOs which can activate it. This can end up unduly punishing all the descendants cgroups. The usual throttling path has the same issue - the iocg must be active while throttled to ensure that future event will wake it up - and solves the problem by synchronizing the throttling path with a spinlock. abs_vdebt handling is another form of overage handling and shares a lot of characteristics including the fact that it isn't in the hottest path. This patch fixes the above and other possible races by strictly synchronizing abs_vdebt and use_delay handling with iocg->waitq.lock. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Reported-by: Vlad Dmitriev <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] # v5.4+ Fixes: e1518f6 ("blk-iocost: Don't let merges push vtime into the future") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit c6e316a upstream. We must check the return value of find_first_bit() before using the return value as an index array since it happens to overflow the array and then panic: [ 107.318430] Kernel BUG [#1] [ 107.319434] CPU: 3 PID: 1238 Comm: kill Tainted: G E 6.6.0-rc6ubuntu-defconfig #2 [ 107.319465] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) [ 107.319551] epc : pmu_sbi_ovf_handler+0x3a4/0x3ae [ 107.319840] ra : pmu_sbi_ovf_handler+0x52/0x3ae [ 107.319868] epc : ffffffff80a0a77c ra : ffffffff80a0a42a sp : ffffaf83fecda350 [ 107.319884] gp : ffffffff823961a8 tp : ffffaf8083db1dc0 t0 : ffffaf83fecda480 [ 107.319899] t1 : ffffffff80cafe62 t2 : 000000000000ff00 s0 : ffffaf83fecda520 [ 107.319921] s1 : ffffaf83fecda380 a0 : 00000018fca29df0 a1 : ffffffffffffffff [ 107.319936] a2 : 0000000001073734 a3 : 0000000000000004 a4 : 0000000000000000 [ 107.319951] a5 : 0000000000000040 a6 : 000000001d1c8774 a7 : 0000000000504d55 [ 107.319965] s2 : ffffffff82451f10 s3 : ffffffff82724e70 s4 : 000000000000003f [ 107.319980] s5 : 0000000000000011 s6 : ffffaf8083db27c0 s7 : 0000000000000000 [ 107.319995] s8 : 0000000000000001 s9 : 00007fffb45d6558 s10: 00007fffb45d81a0 [ 107.320009] s11: ffffaf7ffff60000 t3 : 0000000000000004 t4 : 0000000000000000 [ 107.320023] t5 : ffffaf7f80000000 t6 : ffffaf8000000000 [ 107.320037] status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000003 [ 107.320081] [<ffffffff80a0a77c>] pmu_sbi_ovf_handler+0x3a4/0x3ae [ 107.320112] [<ffffffff800b42d0>] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x9e/0x1a0 [ 107.320131] [<ffffffff800ad92c>] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x28/0x36 [ 107.320148] [<ffffffff8065f9f8>] riscv_intc_irq+0x36/0x4e [ 107.320166] [<ffffffff80caf4a0>] handle_riscv_irq+0x54/0x86 [ 107.320189] [<ffffffff80cb0036>] do_irq+0x64/0x96 [ 107.320271] Code: 85a6 855e b097 ff7f 80e7 9220 b709 9002 4501 bbd9 (9002) 6097 [ 107.320585] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 107.320704] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt [ 107.320775] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs [ 107.321219] Kernel Offset: 0x0 from 0xffffffff80000000 [ 107.333051] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt ]--- Fixes: 4905ec2 ("RISC-V: Add sscofpmf extension support") Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit 807252f upstream. Running smb2.rename test from Samba smbtorture suite against a kernel built with lockdep triggers a "possible recursive locking detected" warning. This is because mnt_want_write() is called twice with no mnt_drop_write() in between: -> ksmbd_vfs_mkdir() -> ksmbd_vfs_kern_path_create() -> kern_path_create() -> filename_create() -> mnt_want_write() -> mnt_want_write() Fix this by removing the mnt_want_write/mnt_drop_write calls from vfs helpers that call kern_path_create(). Full lockdep trace below: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.6.0-rc5 torvalds#775 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/1:1/32 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksmbd_vfs_mkdir+0xe1/0x410 but task is already holding lock: ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0xb6/0x260 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(sb_writers#5); lock(sb_writers#5); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by kworker/1:1/32: #0: ffff8880064e4138 ((wq_completion)ksmbd-io){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x40e/0x980 #1: ffff888005b0fdd0 ((work_completion)(&work->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x40e/0x980 #2: ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0xb6/0x260 #3: ffff8880057ce760 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x123/0x260 Cc: [email protected] Fixes: 40b268d ("ksmbd: add mnt_want_write to ksmbd vfs functions") Signed-off-by: Marios Makassikis <[email protected]> Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit 5a22fbc upstream. When LAN9303 is MDIO-connected two callchains exist into mdio->bus->write(): 1. switch ports 1&2 ("physical" PHYs): virtual (switch-internal) MDIO bus (lan9303_switch_ops->phy_{read|write})-> lan9303_mdio_phy_{read|write} -> mdiobus_{read|write}_nested 2. LAN9303 virtual PHY: virtual MDIO bus (lan9303_phy_{read|write}) -> lan9303_virt_phy_reg_{read|write} -> regmap -> lan9303_mdio_{read|write} If the latter functions just take mutex_lock(&sw_dev->device->bus->mdio_lock) it triggers a LOCKDEP false-positive splat. It's false-positive because the first mdio_lock in the second callchain above belongs to virtual MDIO bus, the second mdio_lock belongs to physical MDIO bus. Consequent annotation in lan9303_mdio_{read|write} as nested lock (similar to lan9303_mdio_phy_{read|write}, it's the same physical MDIO bus) prevents the following splat: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.15.71 #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u4:3/609 is trying to acquire lock: ffff000011531c68 (lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regmap_lock_mutex but task is already holding lock: ffff0000114c44d8 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mdiobus_read which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested lan9303_mdio_read _regmap_read regmap_read lan9303_probe lan9303_mdio_probe mdio_probe really_probe __driver_probe_device driver_probe_device __device_attach_driver bus_for_each_drv __device_attach device_initial_probe bus_probe_device deferred_probe_work_func process_one_work worker_thread kthread ret_from_fork -> #0 (lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire lock_acquire.part.0 lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested regmap_lock_mutex regmap_read lan9303_phy_read dsa_slave_phy_read __mdiobus_read mdiobus_read get_phy_device mdiobus_scan __mdiobus_register dsa_register_switch lan9303_probe lan9303_mdio_probe mdio_probe really_probe __driver_probe_device driver_probe_device __device_attach_driver bus_for_each_drv __device_attach device_initial_probe bus_probe_device deferred_probe_work_func process_one_work worker_thread kthread ret_from_fork other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&bus->mdio_lock); lock(lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock); lock(&bus->mdio_lock); lock(lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by kworker/u4:3/609: #0: ffff000002842938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work #1: ffff80000bacbd60 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work #2: ffff000007645178 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_attach #3: ffff8000096e6e78 (dsa2_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dsa_register_switch #4: ffff0000114c44d8 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mdiobus_read stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 609 Comm: kworker/u4:3 Not tainted 5.15.71 #1 Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func Call trace: dump_backtrace show_stack dump_stack_lvl dump_stack print_circular_bug check_noncircular __lock_acquire lock_acquire.part.0 lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested regmap_lock_mutex regmap_read lan9303_phy_read dsa_slave_phy_read __mdiobus_read mdiobus_read get_phy_device mdiobus_scan __mdiobus_register dsa_register_switch lan9303_probe lan9303_mdio_probe ... Cc: [email protected] Fixes: dc70058 ("net: dsa: LAN9303: add MDIO managed mode support") Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit d8b90d6 upstream. When scanning namespaces, it is possible to get valid data from the first call to nvme_identify_ns() in nvme_alloc_ns(), but not from the second call in nvme_update_ns_info_block(). In particular, if the NSID becomes inactive between the two commands, a storage device may return a buffer filled with zero as per 4.1.5.1. In this case, we can get a kernel crash due to a divide-by-zero in blk_stack_limits() because ns->lba_shift will be set to zero. PID: 326 TASK: ffff95fec3cd8000 CPU: 29 COMMAND: "kworker/u98:10" #0 [ffffad8f8702f9e0] machine_kexec at ffffffff91c76ec7 #1 [ffffad8f8702fa38] __crash_kexec at ffffffff91dea4fa #2 [ffffad8f8702faf8] crash_kexec at ffffffff91deb788 #3 [ffffad8f8702fb00] oops_end at ffffffff91c2e4bb #4 [ffffad8f8702fb20] do_trap at ffffffff91c2a4ce #5 [ffffad8f8702fb70] do_error_trap at ffffffff91c2a595 #6 [ffffad8f8702fbb0] exc_divide_error at ffffffff928506e6 #7 [ffffad8f8702fbd0] asm_exc_divide_error at ffffffff92a00926 [exception RIP: blk_stack_limits+434] RIP: ffffffff92191872 RSP: ffffad8f8702fc80 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff95efa0c91800 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 00000000ffffffff R8: ffff95fec7df35a8 R9: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff95fed33c09a8 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #8 [ffffad8f8702fce0] nvme_update_ns_info_block at ffffffffc06d3533 [nvme_core] torvalds#9 [ffffad8f8702fd18] nvme_scan_ns at ffffffffc06d6fa7 [nvme_core] This happened when the check for valid data was moved out of nvme_identify_ns() into one of the callers. Fix this by checking in both callers. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218186 Fixes: 0dd6fff ("nvme: bring back auto-removal of deleted namespaces during sequential scan") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit a2e36cd ] This allows it to break the following circular locking dependency. Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ====================================================== Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: 6.4.0-rc7+ torvalds#10 Not tainted Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ------------------------------------------------------ Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: wireplumber/2236 is trying to acquire lock: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ffff8fca5320da18 (&fctx->lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler+0x2b/0x100 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: but task is already holding lock: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ffff8fca41208610 (&event->list_lock#2){-...}-{2:2}, at: nvkm_event_ntfy+0x50/0xf0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: which lock already depends on the new lock. Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: -> #3 (&event->list_lock#2){-...}-{2:2}: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x70 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy+0x50/0xf0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ga100_fifo_nonstall_intr+0x24/0x30 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_intr+0x12c/0x240 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_irq_event+0x38/0x80 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_edge_irq+0xa3/0x240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __common_interrupt+0x72/0x160 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: common_interrupt+0x60/0xe0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: -> #2 (&device->intr.lock){-...}-{2:2}: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x70 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_inth_allow+0x2c/0x80 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy_state+0x181/0x250 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy_allow+0x63/0xd0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_uevent_mthd+0x4d/0x70 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_ioctl+0x10b/0x250 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvif_object_mthd+0xa8/0x1f0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvif_event_allow+0x2a/0xa0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_fence_enable_signaling+0x78/0x80 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __dma_fence_enable_signaling+0x5e/0x100 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: dma_fence_add_callback+0x4b/0xd0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_cli_work_queue+0xae/0x110 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_gem_object_close+0x1d1/0x2a0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_gem_handle_delete+0x70/0xe0 [drm] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa5/0x150 [drm] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_ioctl+0x256/0x490 [drm] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_drm_ioctl+0x5a/0xb0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __x64_sys_ioctl+0x91/0xd0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: do_syscall_64+0x3c/0x90 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: -> #1 (&event->refs_lock#4){....}-{2:2}: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x70 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy_state+0x37/0x250 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy_allow+0x63/0xd0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_uevent_mthd+0x4d/0x70 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_ioctl+0x10b/0x250 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvif_object_mthd+0xa8/0x1f0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvif_event_allow+0x2a/0xa0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_fence_enable_signaling+0x78/0x80 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __dma_fence_enable_signaling+0x5e/0x100 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: dma_fence_add_callback+0x4b/0xd0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_cli_work_queue+0xae/0x110 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_gem_object_close+0x1d1/0x2a0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_gem_handle_delete+0x70/0xe0 [drm] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa5/0x150 [drm] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_ioctl+0x256/0x490 [drm] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_drm_ioctl+0x5a/0xb0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __x64_sys_ioctl+0x91/0xd0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: do_syscall_64+0x3c/0x90 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: -> #0 (&fctx->lock){-...}-{2:2}: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __lock_acquire+0x14e3/0x2240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock_acquire+0xc8/0x2a0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x70 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler+0x2b/0x100 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_client_event+0xf/0x20 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy+0x9b/0xf0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ga100_fifo_nonstall_intr+0x24/0x30 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_intr+0x12c/0x240 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_irq_event+0x38/0x80 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_edge_irq+0xa3/0x240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __common_interrupt+0x72/0x160 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: common_interrupt+0x60/0xe0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: other info that might help us debug this: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: Chain exists of: &fctx->lock --> &device->intr.lock --> &event->list_lock#2 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: Possible unsafe locking scenario: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: CPU0 CPU1 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ---- ---- Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock(&event->list_lock#2); Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock(&device->intr.lock); Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock(&event->list_lock#2); Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock(&fctx->lock); Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: *** DEADLOCK *** Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: 2 locks held by wireplumber/2236: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: #0: ffff8fca53177bf8 (&device->intr.lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: nvkm_intr+0x29/0x240 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: #1: ffff8fca41208610 (&event->list_lock#2){-...}-{2:2}, at: nvkm_event_ntfy+0x50/0xf0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: stack backtrace: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: CPU: 6 PID: 2236 Comm: wireplumber Not tainted 6.4.0-rc7+ torvalds#10 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI/Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF, BIOS F8 11/05/2021 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: Call Trace: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: <TASK> Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x90 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: check_noncircular+0xe2/0x110 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __lock_acquire+0x14e3/0x2240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock_acquire+0xc8/0x2a0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ? nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler+0x2b/0x100 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ? lock_acquire+0xc8/0x2a0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x70 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ? nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler+0x2b/0x100 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler+0x2b/0x100 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_client_event+0xf/0x20 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy+0x9b/0xf0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ga100_fifo_nonstall_intr+0x24/0x30 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_intr+0x12c/0x240 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_irq_event+0x38/0x80 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_edge_irq+0xa3/0x240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __common_interrupt+0x72/0x160 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: common_interrupt+0x60/0xe0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7fb66174d700 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: Code: c1 e2 05 29 ca 8d 0c 10 0f be 07 84 c0 75 eb 89 c8 c3 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa e9 d7 0f fc ff 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 <f3> 0f 1e fa e9 c7 0f fc> Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffdd3c48438 EFLAGS: 00000206 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: RAX: 000055bb758763c0 RBX: 000055bb758752c0 RCX: 00000000000028b0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: RDX: 000055bb758752c0 RSI: 000055bb75887490 RDI: 000055bb75862950 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: RBP: 00007ffdd3c48490 R08: 000055bb75873b10 R09: 0000000000000001 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 000055bb7587f000 R12: 000055bb75887490 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: R13: 000055bb757f6280 R14: 000055bb758875c0 R15: 000055bb757f6280 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: </TASK> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <[email protected]> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit e3e82fc ] When creating ceq_0 during probing irdma, cqp.sc_cqp will be sent as a cqp_request to cqp->sc_cqp.sq_ring. If the request is pending when removing the irdma driver or unplugging its aux device, cqp.sc_cqp will be dereferenced as wrong struct in irdma_free_pending_cqp_request(). PID: 3669 TASK: ffff88aef892c000 CPU: 28 COMMAND: "kworker/28:0" #0 [fffffe0000549e38] crash_nmi_callback at ffffffff810e3a34 #1 [fffffe0000549e40] nmi_handle at ffffffff810788b2 #2 [fffffe0000549ea0] default_do_nmi at ffffffff8107938f #3 [fffffe0000549eb8] do_nmi at ffffffff81079582 #4 [fffffe0000549ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffff82e016b4 [exception RIP: native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+1291] RIP: ffffffff8127e72b RSP: ffff88aa841ef778 RFLAGS: 00000046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88b01f849700 RCX: ffffffff8127e47e RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffff83857ec0 RBP: ffff88afe3e4efc8 R8: ffffed15fc7c9dfa R9: ffffed15fc7c9dfa R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed15fc7c9df9 R12: 0000000000740000 R13: ffff88b01f849708 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: ffffed1603f092e1 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0000 -- <NMI exception stack> -- #5 [ffff88aa841ef778] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff8127e72b #6 [ffff88aa841ef7b0] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff82c22aa4 #7 [ffff88aa841ef7c8] __wake_up_common_lock at ffffffff81257363 #8 [ffff88aa841ef888] irdma_free_pending_cqp_request at ffffffffa0ba12cc [irdma] torvalds#9 [ffff88aa841ef958] irdma_cleanup_pending_cqp_op at ffffffffa0ba1469 [irdma] torvalds#10 [ffff88aa841ef9c0] irdma_ctrl_deinit_hw at ffffffffa0b2989f [irdma] torvalds#11 [ffff88aa841efa28] irdma_remove at ffffffffa0b252df [irdma] torvalds#12 [ffff88aa841efae8] auxiliary_bus_remove at ffffffff8219afdb torvalds#13 [ffff88aa841efb00] device_release_driver_internal at ffffffff821882e6 torvalds#14 [ffff88aa841efb38] bus_remove_device at ffffffff82184278 torvalds#15 [ffff88aa841efb88] device_del at ffffffff82179d23 torvalds#16 [ffff88aa841efc48] ice_unplug_aux_dev at ffffffffa0eb1c14 [ice] torvalds#17 [ffff88aa841efc68] ice_service_task at ffffffffa0d88201 [ice] torvalds#18 [ffff88aa841efde8] process_one_work at ffffffff811c589a torvalds#19 [ffff88aa841efe60] worker_thread at ffffffff811c71ff torvalds#20 [ffff88aa841eff10] kthread at ffffffff811d87a0 torvalds#21 [ffff88aa841eff50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff82e0022f Fixes: 44d9e52 ("RDMA/irdma: Implement device initialization definitions") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Suggested-by: "Ismail, Mustafa" <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Shifeng Li <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Shiraz Saleem <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit fe2b122 upstream. When working on LED support for r8169 I got the following lockdep warning. Easiest way to prevent this scenario seems to be to take the RTNL lock before the trigger_data lock in set_device_name(). ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc2-next-20231124+ #2 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ bash/383 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888103aa1c68 (&trigger_data->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: netdev_trig_notify+0xec/0x190 [ledtrig_netdev] but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8cddf808 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_lock+0x12/0x20 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9b/0xb50 mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 rtnl_lock+0x12/0x20 set_device_name+0xa9/0x120 [ledtrig_netdev] netdev_trig_activate+0x1a1/0x230 [ledtrig_netdev] led_trigger_set+0x172/0x2c0 led_trigger_write+0xf1/0x140 sysfs_kf_bin_write+0x5d/0x80 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x15d/0x210 vfs_write+0x1f0/0x510 ksys_write+0x6c/0xf0 __x64_sys_write+0x14/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6c/0x74 -> #0 (&trigger_data->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1459/0x25a0 lock_acquire+0xc8/0x2d0 __mutex_lock+0x9b/0xb50 mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 netdev_trig_notify+0xec/0x190 [ledtrig_netdev] call_netdevice_register_net_notifiers+0x5a/0x100 register_netdevice_notifier+0x85/0x120 netdev_trig_activate+0x1d4/0x230 [ledtrig_netdev] led_trigger_set+0x172/0x2c0 led_trigger_write+0xf1/0x140 sysfs_kf_bin_write+0x5d/0x80 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x15d/0x210 vfs_write+0x1f0/0x510 ksys_write+0x6c/0xf0 __x64_sys_write+0x14/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6c/0x74 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(rtnl_mutex); lock(&trigger_data->lock); lock(rtnl_mutex); lock(&trigger_data->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 8 locks held by bash/383: #0: ffff888103ff33f0 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x6c/0xf0 #1: ffff888103aa1e88 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x114/0x210 #2: ffff8881036f1890 (kn->active#82){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11d/0x210 #3: ffff888108e2c358 (&led_cdev->led_access){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: led_trigger_write+0x30/0x140 #4: ffffffff8cdd9e10 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: led_trigger_write+0x75/0x140 #5: ffff888108e2c270 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: led_trigger_write+0xe3/0x140 #6: ffffffff8cdde3d0 (pernet_ops_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: register_netdevice_notifier+0x1c/0x120 #7: ffffffff8cddf808 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_lock+0x12/0x20 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 383 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.7.0-rc2-next-20231124+ #2 Hardware name: Default string Default string/Default string, BIOS ADLN.M6.SODIMM.ZB.CY.015 08/08/2023 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x5c/0xd0 dump_stack+0x10/0x20 print_circular_bug+0x2dd/0x410 check_noncircular+0x131/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x1459/0x25a0 lock_acquire+0xc8/0x2d0 ? netdev_trig_notify+0xec/0x190 [ledtrig_netdev] __mutex_lock+0x9b/0xb50 ? netdev_trig_notify+0xec/0x190 [ledtrig_netdev] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20 ? netdev_trig_notify+0xec/0x190 [ledtrig_netdev] ? __cancel_work_timer+0x11c/0x1b0 ? __mutex_lock+0x123/0xb50 mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 ? mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 netdev_trig_notify+0xec/0x190 [ledtrig_netdev] call_netdevice_register_net_notifiers+0x5a/0x100 register_netdevice_notifier+0x85/0x120 netdev_trig_activate+0x1d4/0x230 [ledtrig_netdev] led_trigger_set+0x172/0x2c0 ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xc0 led_trigger_write+0xf1/0x140 sysfs_kf_bin_write+0x5d/0x80 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x15d/0x210 vfs_write+0x1f0/0x510 ksys_write+0x6c/0xf0 __x64_sys_write+0x14/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6c/0x74 RIP: 0033:0x7f269055d034 Code: c7 00 16 00 00 00 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d 35 c3 0d 00 00 74 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 c3 0f 1f 00 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffddb7ef748 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000007 RCX: 00007f269055d034 RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: 000055bf5f4af3c0 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 000055bf5f4af3c0 R08: 0000000000000073 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000007 R13: 00007f26906325c0 R14: 00007f269062ff20 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Fixes: d5e0126 ("leds: trigger: netdev: add additional specific link speed mode") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <[email protected]> Acked-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit eab0da3 ] Due to the cited patch, devlink health commands take devlink lock and this may result in deadlock for mlx5e_tx_reporter as it takes local state_lock before calling devlink health report and on the other hand devlink health commands such as diagnose for same reporter take local state_lock after taking devlink lock (see kernel log below). To fix it, remove local state_lock from mlx5e_tx_timeout_work() before calling devlink_health_report() and take care to cancel the work before any call to close channels, which may free the SQs that should be handled by the work. Before cancel_work_sync(), use current_work() to check we are not calling it from within the work, as mlx5e_tx_timeout_work() itself may close the channels and reopen as part of recovery flow. While removing state_lock from mlx5e_tx_timeout_work() keep rtnl_lock to ensure no change in netdev->real_num_tx_queues, but use rtnl_trylock() and a flag to avoid deadlock by calling cancel_work_sync() before closing the channels while holding rtnl_lock too. Kernel log: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.0.0-rc3_for_upstream_debug_2022_08_30_13_10 #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u16:2/65 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888122f6c2f8 (&devlink->lock_key#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff888121d20be0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x70/0x280 [mlx5_core] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x12c/0x14b0 mlx5e_rx_reporter_diagnose+0x71/0x700 [mlx5_core] devlink_nl_cmd_health_reporter_diagnose_doit+0x212/0xa50 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x1e9/0x2f0 genl_rcv_msg+0x2e9/0x530 netlink_rcv_skb+0x11d/0x340 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x438/0x710 netlink_sendmsg+0x788/0xc40 sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xe0 __sys_sendto+0x1c1/0x290 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdd/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 -> #0 (&devlink->lock_key#2){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x2c8a/0x6200 lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x550 __mutex_lock+0x12c/0x14b0 devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 mlx5e_health_report+0xc9/0xd7 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_reporter_tx_timeout+0x2ab/0x3d0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x1c1/0x280 [mlx5_core] process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1340 worker_thread+0x59d/0xec0 kthread+0x28f/0x330 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&priv->state_lock); lock(&devlink->lock_key#2); lock(&priv->state_lock); lock(&devlink->lock_key#2); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u16:2/65: #0: ffff88811a55b138 ((wq_completion)mlx5e#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x6e2/0x1340 #1: ffff888101de7db8 ((work_completion)(&priv->tx_timeout_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x70f/0x1340 #2: ffffffff84ce8328 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x53/0x280 [mlx5_core] #3: ffff888121d20be0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x70/0x280 [mlx5_core] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 65 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc3_for_upstream_debug_2022_08_30_13_10 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: mlx5e mlx5e_tx_timeout_work [mlx5_core] Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d check_noncircular+0x278/0x300 ? print_circular_bug+0x460/0x460 ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x110 ? __stack_depot_save+0x24c/0x520 ? alloc_chain_hlocks+0x228/0x700 __lock_acquire+0x2c8a/0x6200 ? register_lock_class+0x1860/0x1860 ? kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 ? kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x30 ? ____kasan_slab_free+0x11d/0x1b0 ? kfree+0x1ba/0x520 ? devlink_health_do_dump.part.0+0x171/0x3a0 ? devlink_health_report+0x3d5/0x7e0 lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x550 ? devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x110 __mutex_lock+0x12c/0x14b0 ? devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 ? devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1320/0x1320 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x2d/0x100 ? bit_wait_io_timeout+0x170/0x170 ? devlink_health_do_dump.part.0+0x171/0x3a0 ? kfree+0x1ba/0x520 ? devlink_health_do_dump.part.0+0x171/0x3a0 devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 mlx5e_health_report+0xc9/0xd7 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_reporter_tx_timeout+0x2ab/0x3d0 [mlx5_core] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? mlx5e_reporter_tx_err_cqe+0x1b0/0x1b0 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_tx_reporter_timeout_dump+0x70/0x70 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_tx_reporter_dump_sq+0x320/0x320 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x70/0x280 [mlx5_core] ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1320/0x1320 ? process_one_work+0x70f/0x1340 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x1c1/0x280 [mlx5_core] process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1340 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x230/0x230 ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 worker_thread+0x59d/0xec0 ? process_one_work+0x1340/0x1340 kthread+0x28f/0x330 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 </TASK> Fixes: c90005b ("devlink: Hold the instance lock in health callbacks") Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 15319a4 ] As &card->tx_queue_lock is acquired under softirq context along the following call chain from solos_bh(), other acquisition of the same lock inside process context should disable at least bh to avoid double lock. <deadlock #2> pclose() --> spin_lock(&card->tx_queue_lock) <interrupt> --> solos_bh() --> fpga_tx() --> spin_lock(&card->tx_queue_lock) This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am developing for irq-related deadlock. To prevent the potential deadlock, the patch uses spin_lock_bh() on &card->tx_queue_lock under process context code consistently to prevent the possible deadlock scenario. Fixes: 213e85d ("solos-pci: clean up pclose() function") Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

@len

commit 90d025c upstream. If server replied SMB2_NEGOTIATE with a zero SecurityBufferOffset, smb2_get_data_area() sets @len to non-zero but return NULL, so decode_negTokeninit() ends up being called with a NULL @security_blob: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 871 Comm: mount.cifs Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:asn1_ber_decoder+0x173/0xc80 Code: 01 4c 39 2c 24 75 09 45 84 c9 0f 85 2f 03 00 00 48 8b 14 24 4c 29 ea 48 83 fa 01 0f 86 1e 07 00 00 48 8b 74 24 28 4d 8d 5d 01 <42> 0f b6 3c 2e 89 fa 40 88 7c 24 5c f7 d2 83 e2 1f 0f 84 3d 07 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000063f950 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000000000004a RDX: 000000000000004a RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000000000000004d R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fce52b0fbc0(0000) GS:ffff88806ba00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000001ae64000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x23/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x181/0x480 ? __stack_depot_save+0x1e6/0x480 ? exc_page_fault+0x6f/0x1c0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? asn1_ber_decoder+0x173/0xc80 ? check_object+0x40/0x340 decode_negTokenInit+0x1e/0x30 [cifs] SMB2_negotiate+0xc99/0x17c0 [cifs] ? smb2_negotiate+0x46/0x60 [cifs] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 smb2_negotiate+0x46/0x60 [cifs] cifs_negotiate_protocol+0xae/0x130 [cifs] cifs_get_smb_ses+0x517/0x1040 [cifs] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x5d/0x90 cifs_mount_get_session+0x78/0x200 [cifs] dfs_mount_share+0x13a/0x9f0 [cifs] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0 ? find_nls+0x16/0x80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 cifs_mount+0x7e/0x350 [cifs] cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x128/0x780 [cifs] smb3_get_tree+0xd9/0x290 [cifs] vfs_get_tree+0x2c/0x100 ? capable+0x37/0x70 path_mount+0x2d7/0xb80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x60 __x64_sys_mount+0x11a/0x150 do_syscall_64+0x47/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 RIP: 0033:0x7fce52c2ab1e Fix this by setting @len to zero when @off == 0 so callers won't attempt to dereference non-existing data areas. Reported-by: Robert Morris <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit 3a42709 upstream. Validate @ioctl_rsp->OutputOffset and @ioctl_rsp->OutputCount so that their sum does not wrap to a number that is smaller than @reparse_buf and we end up with a wild pointer as follows: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff88809c5cd45f #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 4a01067 P4D 4a01067 PUD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 1260 Comm: mount.cifs Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:smb2_query_reparse_point+0x3e0/0x4c0 [cifs] Code: ff ff e8 f3 51 fe ff 41 89 c6 58 5a 45 85 f6 0f 85 14 fe ff ff 49 8b 57 48 8b 42 60 44 8b 42 64 42 8d 0c 00 49 39 4f 50 72 40 <8b> 04 02 48 8b 9d f0 fe ff ff 49 8b 57 50 89 03 48 8b 9d e8 fe ff RSP: 0018:ffffc90000347a90 EFLAGS: 00010212 RAX: 000000008000001f RBX: ffff88800ae11000 RCX: 00000000000000ec RDX: ffff88801c5cd440 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff82004aa4 RBP: ffffc90000347bb0 R08: 00000000800000cd R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000024 R12: ffff8880114d4100 R13: ffff8880114d4198 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8880114d4000 FS: 00007f02c07babc0(0000) GS:ffff88806ba00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffff88809c5cd45f CR3: 0000000011750000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x23/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x181/0x480 ? search_module_extables+0x19/0x60 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? exc_page_fault+0x1b6/0x1c0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x60 ? smb2_query_reparse_point+0x3e0/0x4c0 [cifs] cifs_get_fattr+0x16e/0xa50 [cifs] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0 cifs_root_iget+0x163/0x5f0 [cifs] cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x5bd/0x780 [cifs] smb3_get_tree+0xd9/0x290 [cifs] vfs_get_tree+0x2c/0x100 ? capable+0x37/0x70 path_mount+0x2d7/0xb80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x60 __x64_sys_mount+0x11a/0x150 do_syscall_64+0x47/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 RIP: 0033:0x7f02c08d5b1e Fixes: 2e4564b ("smb3: add support for stat of WSL reparse points for special file types") Cc: [email protected] Reported-by: Robert Morris <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit da75fa5 ] Coverity Scan reports the following issue. But it's impossible that mlx5_get_dev_index returns 7 for PF, even if the index is calculated from PCI FUNC ID. So add the checking to make coverity slience. CID 610894 (#2 of 2): Out-of-bounds write (OVERRUN) Overrunning array esw->fdb_table.offloads.peer_miss_rules of 4 8-byte elements at element index 7 (byte offset 63) using index mlx5_get_dev_index(peer_dev) (which evaluates to 7). Fixes: 9bee385 ("net/mlx5: E-switch, refactor FDB miss rule add/remove") Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 769bf60 ] syzbot found a potential circular dependency leading to a deadlock: -> #3 (&hdev->req_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x1b6/0x1bc2 kernel/locking/mutex.c:599 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:732 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x1c kernel/locking/mutex.c:784 hci_dev_do_close+0x3f/0x9f net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:551 hci_rfkill_set_block+0x130/0x1ac net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:935 rfkill_set_block+0x1e6/0x3b8 net/rfkill/core.c:345 rfkill_fop_write+0x2d8/0x672 net/rfkill/core.c:1274 vfs_write+0x277/0xcf5 fs/read_write.c:594 ksys_write+0x19b/0x2bd fs/read_write.c:650 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:55 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x51/0xba arch/x86/entry/common.c:93 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb -> #2 (rfkill_global_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x1b6/0x1bc2 kernel/locking/mutex.c:599 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:732 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x1c kernel/locking/mutex.c:784 rfkill_register+0x30/0x7e3 net/rfkill/core.c:1045 hci_register_dev+0x48f/0x96d net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:2622 __vhci_create_device drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:341 [inline] vhci_create_device+0x3ad/0x68f drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:374 vhci_get_user drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:431 [inline] vhci_write+0x37b/0x429 drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:511 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2109 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:509 [inline] vfs_write+0xaa8/0xcf5 fs/read_write.c:596 ksys_write+0x19b/0x2bd fs/read_write.c:650 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:55 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x51/0xba arch/x86/entry/common.c:93 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb -> #1 (&data->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x1b6/0x1bc2 kernel/locking/mutex.c:599 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:732 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x1c kernel/locking/mutex.c:784 vhci_send_frame+0x68/0x9c drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:75 hci_send_frame+0x1cc/0x2ff net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:2989 hci_sched_acl_pkt net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3498 [inline] hci_sched_acl net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3583 [inline] hci_tx_work+0xb94/0x1a60 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3654 process_one_work+0x901/0xfb8 kernel/workqueue.c:2310 worker_thread+0xa67/0x1003 kernel/workqueue.c:2457 kthread+0x36a/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:298 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->tx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3787 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2d32/0x77fa kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5011 lock_acquire+0x273/0x4d5 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5622 __flush_work+0xee/0x19f kernel/workqueue.c:3090 hci_dev_close_sync+0x32f/0x1113 net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c:4352 hci_dev_do_close+0x47/0x9f net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:553 hci_rfkill_set_block+0x130/0x1ac net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:935 rfkill_set_block+0x1e6/0x3b8 net/rfkill/core.c:345 rfkill_fop_write+0x2d8/0x672 net/rfkill/core.c:1274 vfs_write+0x277/0xcf5 fs/read_write.c:594 ksys_write+0x19b/0x2bd fs/read_write.c:650 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:55 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x51/0xba arch/x86/entry/common.c:93 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb This change removes the need for acquiring the open_mutex in vhci_send_frame, thus eliminating the potential deadlock while maintaining the required packet ordering. Fixes: 92d4abd ("Bluetooth: vhci: Fix race when opening vhci device") Signed-off-by: Ying Hsu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b1dfc0f ] Calling led_trigger_register() when attaching a PHY located on an SFP module potentially (and practically) leads into a deadlock. Fix this by not calling led_trigger_register() for PHYs localted on SFP modules as such modules actually never got any LEDs. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc4-next-20231208+ #0 Tainted: G O ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u8:2/43 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffc08108c4e8 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: led_trigger_register+0x4c/0x1a8 but task is already holding lock: ffffff80c5c6f318 (&sfp->sm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleanup_module+0x2ba8/0x3120 [sfp] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&sfp->sm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x88/0x7a0 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 cleanup_module+0x2ae0/0x3120 [sfp] sfp_register_bus+0x5c/0x9c sfp_register_socket+0x48/0xd4 cleanup_module+0x271c/0x3120 [sfp] platform_probe+0x64/0xb8 really_probe+0x17c/0x3c0 __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x164 driver_probe_device+0x3c/0xd4 __driver_attach+0xec/0x1f0 bus_for_each_dev+0x60/0xa0 driver_attach+0x20/0x28 bus_add_driver+0x108/0x208 driver_register+0x5c/0x118 __platform_driver_register+0x24/0x2c init_module+0x28/0xa7c [sfp] do_one_initcall+0x70/0x2ec do_init_module+0x54/0x1e4 load_module+0x1b78/0x1c8c __do_sys_init_module+0x1bc/0x2cc __arm64_sys_init_module+0x18/0x20 invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x4c/0xdc do_el0_svc+0x3c/0xbc el0_svc+0x34/0x80 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf8/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154 -> #2 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x88/0x7a0 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 rtnl_lock+0x18/0x20 set_device_name+0x30/0x130 netdev_trig_activate+0x13c/0x1ac led_trigger_set+0x118/0x234 led_trigger_write+0x104/0x17c sysfs_kf_bin_write+0x64/0x80 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x128/0x1b4 vfs_write+0x178/0x2a4 ksys_write+0x58/0xd4 __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x4c/0xdc do_el0_svc+0x3c/0xbc el0_svc+0x34/0x80 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf8/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154 -> #1 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){++++}-{3:3}: down_write+0x4c/0x13c led_trigger_write+0xf8/0x17c sysfs_kf_bin_write+0x64/0x80 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x128/0x1b4 vfs_write+0x178/0x2a4 ksys_write+0x58/0xd4 __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x4c/0xdc do_el0_svc+0x3c/0xbc el0_svc+0x34/0x80 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf8/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154 -> #0 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x12a0/0x2014 lock_acquire+0x100/0x2ac down_write+0x4c/0x13c led_trigger_register+0x4c/0x1a8 phy_led_triggers_register+0x9c/0x214 phy_attach_direct+0x154/0x36c phylink_attach_phy+0x30/0x60 phylink_sfp_connect_phy+0x140/0x510 sfp_add_phy+0x34/0x50 init_module+0x15c/0xa7c [sfp] cleanup_module+0x1d94/0x3120 [sfp] cleanup_module+0x2bb4/0x3120 [sfp] process_one_work+0x1f8/0x4ec worker_thread+0x1e8/0x3d8 kthread+0x104/0x110 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: triggers_list_lock --> rtnl_mutex --> &sfp->sm_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&sfp->sm_mutex); lock(rtnl_mutex); lock(&sfp->sm_mutex); lock(triggers_list_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u8:2/43: #0: ffffff80c000f938 ((wq_completion)events_power_efficient){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x150/0x4ec #1: ffffffc08214bde8 ((work_completion)(&(&sfp->timeout)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x150/0x4ec #2: ffffffc0810902f8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_lock+0x18/0x20 #3: ffffff80c5c6f318 (&sfp->sm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleanup_module+0x2ba8/0x3120 [sfp] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 43 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Tainted: G O 6.7.0-rc4-next-20231208+ #0 Hardware name: Bananapi BPI-R4 (DT) Workqueue: events_power_efficient cleanup_module [sfp] Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xa8/0x10c show_stack+0x14/0x1c dump_stack_lvl+0x5c/0xa0 dump_stack+0x14/0x1c print_circular_bug+0x328/0x430 check_noncircular+0x124/0x134 __lock_acquire+0x12a0/0x2014 lock_acquire+0x100/0x2ac down_write+0x4c/0x13c led_trigger_register+0x4c/0x1a8 phy_led_triggers_register+0x9c/0x214 phy_attach_direct+0x154/0x36c phylink_attach_phy+0x30/0x60 phylink_sfp_connect_phy+0x140/0x510 sfp_add_phy+0x34/0x50 init_module+0x15c/0xa7c [sfp] cleanup_module+0x1d94/0x3120 [sfp] cleanup_module+0x2bb4/0x3120 [sfp] process_one_work+0x1f8/0x4ec worker_thread+0x1e8/0x3d8 kthread+0x104/0x110 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <[email protected]> Fixes: 01e5b72 ("net: phy: Add a binding for PHY LEDs") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/102a9dce38bdf00215735d04cd4704458273ad9c.1702339354.git.daniel@makrotopia.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 1469417 ] Trying to suspend to RAM on SAMA5D27 EVK leads to the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ torvalds#532 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- sh/92 is trying to acquire lock: c3cf306c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 but task is already holding lock: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 6 locks held by sh/92: #0: c3aa0258 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 #1: c4c2df44 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x138/0x284 #2: c32684a0 (kn->active){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x148/0x284 #3: c232b6d4 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x13c/0x4e8 #4: c387b088 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_suspend+0x1e8/0x91c #5: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 92 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ torvalds#532 Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x19ec/0x3a0c __lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0x124/0x2d0 lock_acquire.part.0 from _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x78 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave from __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 __irq_get_desc_lock from irq_set_irq_wake+0xa8/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake+0x58/0xb4 atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake from irq_set_irq_wake+0x100/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from gpio_keys_suspend+0xec/0x2b8 gpio_keys_suspend from dpm_run_callback+0xe4/0x248 dpm_run_callback from __device_suspend+0x234/0x91c __device_suspend from dpm_suspend+0x224/0x43c dpm_suspend from dpm_suspend_start+0x9c/0xa8 dpm_suspend_start from suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1e0/0xa84 suspend_devices_and_enter from pm_suspend+0x460/0x4e8 pm_suspend from state_store+0x78/0xe4 state_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1a0/0x284 kernfs_fop_write_iter from vfs_write+0x38c/0x6f4 vfs_write from ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 ksys_write from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c Exception stack(0xc52b3fa8 to 0xc52b3ff0) 3fa0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 005a0ae8 00000004 00000001 3fc0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 00000004 00000004 b6c616c0 00000020 0059d190 3fe0: 00000004 b6c61678 aec5a041 aebf1a26 This warning is raised because pinctrl-at91-pio4 uses chained IRQ. Whenever a wake up source configures an IRQ through irq_set_irq_wake, it will lock the corresponding IRQ desc, and then call irq_set_irq_wake on "parent" IRQ which will do the same on its own IRQ desc, but since those two locks share the same class, lockdep reports this as an issue. Fix lockdep false positive by setting a different class for parent and children IRQ Fixes: 7761808 ("pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller") Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 3f14b37 ] act_ct adds skb->users before defragmentation. If frags arrive in order, the last frag's reference is reset in: inet_frag_reasm_prepare skb_morph which is not straightforward. However when frags arrive out of order, nobody unref the last frag, and all frags are leaked. The situation is even worse, as initiating packet capture can lead to a crash[0] when skb has been cloned and shared at the same time. Fix the issue by removing skb_get() before defragmentation. act_ct returns TC_ACT_CONSUMED when defrag failed or in progress. [0]: [ 843.804823] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 843.809659] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:2091! [ 843.814516] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 843.819296] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S 6.7.0-rc3 #2 [ 843.824107] Hardware name: XFUSION 1288H V6/BC13MBSBD, BIOS 1.29 11/25/2022 [ 843.828953] RIP: 0010:pskb_expand_head+0x2ac/0x300 [ 843.833805] Code: 8b 70 28 48 85 f6 74 82 48 83 c6 08 bf 01 00 00 00 e8 38 bd ff ff 8b 83 c0 00 00 00 48 03 83 c8 00 00 00 e9 62 ff ff ff 0f 0b <0f> 0b e8 8d d0 ff ff e9 b3 fd ff ff 81 7c 24 14 40 01 00 00 4c 89 [ 843.843698] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000cce07c0 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 843.848524] RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff88811a211d00 RCX: 0000000000000820 [ 843.853299] RDX: 0000000000000640 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88811a211d00 [ 843.857974] RBP: ffff888127d39518 R08: 00000000bee97314 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 843.862584] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff8881109f0000 R12: 0000000000000880 [ 843.867147] R13: ffff888127d39580 R14: 0000000000000640 R15: ffff888170f7b900 [ 843.871680] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff889ffffc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 843.876242] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 843.880778] CR2: 00007fa42affcfb8 CR3: 000000011433a002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 [ 843.885336] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 843.889809] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 843.894229] PKRU: 55555554 [ 843.898539] Call Trace: [ 843.902772] <IRQ> [ 843.906922] ? __die_body+0x1e/0x60 [ 843.911032] ? die+0x3c/0x60 [ 843.915037] ? do_trap+0xe2/0x110 [ 843.918911] ? pskb_expand_head+0x2ac/0x300 [ 843.922687] ? do_error_trap+0x65/0x80 [ 843.926342] ? pskb_expand_head+0x2ac/0x300 [ 843.929905] ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x60 [ 843.933398] ? pskb_expand_head+0x2ac/0x300 [ 843.936835] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 843.940226] ? pskb_expand_head+0x2ac/0x300 [ 843.943580] inet_frag_reasm_prepare+0xd1/0x240 [ 843.946904] ip_defrag+0x5d4/0x870 [ 843.950132] nf_ct_handle_fragments+0xec/0x130 [nf_conntrack] [ 843.953334] tcf_ct_act+0x252/0xd90 [act_ct] [ 843.956473] ? tcf_mirred_act+0x516/0x5a0 [act_mirred] [ 843.959657] tcf_action_exec+0xa1/0x160 [ 843.962823] fl_classify+0x1db/0x1f0 [cls_flower] [ 843.966010] ? skb_clone+0x53/0xc0 [ 843.969173] tcf_classify+0x24d/0x420 [ 843.972333] tc_run+0x8f/0xf0 [ 843.975465] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x67a/0x1080 [ 843.978634] ? dev_gro_receive+0x249/0x730 [ 843.981759] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x12d/0x260 [ 843.984869] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1cb/0x2f0 [ 843.987957] ? mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe_mpwrq_rep+0xfa/0x1a0 [mlx5_core] [ 843.991170] napi_complete_done+0x72/0x1a0 [ 843.994305] mlx5e_napi_poll+0x28c/0x6d0 [mlx5_core] [ 843.997501] __napi_poll+0x25/0x1b0 [ 844.000627] net_rx_action+0x256/0x330 [ 844.003705] __do_softirq+0xb3/0x29b [ 844.006718] irq_exit_rcu+0x9e/0xc0 [ 844.009672] common_interrupt+0x86/0xa0 [ 844.012537] </IRQ> [ 844.015285] <TASK> [ 844.017937] asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 [ 844.020591] RIP: 0010:acpi_safe_halt+0x1b/0x20 [ 844.023247] Code: ff 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 65 48 8b 04 25 00 18 03 00 48 8b 00 a8 08 75 0c 66 90 0f 00 2d 81 d0 44 00 fb f4 <fa> c3 0f 1f 00 89 fa ec 48 8b 05 ee 88 ed 00 a9 00 00 00 80 75 11 [ 844.028900] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000533e70 EFLAGS: 00000246 [ 844.031725] RAX: 0000000000004000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 844.034553] RDX: ffff889ffffc0000 RSI: ffffffff828b7f20 RDI: ffff88a090f45c64 [ 844.037368] RBP: ffff88a0901a2800 R08: ffff88a090f45c00 R09: 00000000000317c0 [ 844.040155] R10: 00ec812281150475 R11: ffff889fffff0e04 R12: ffffffff828b7fa0 [ 844.042962] R13: ffffffff828b7f20 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 844.045819] acpi_idle_enter+0x7b/0xc0 [ 844.048621] cpuidle_enter_state+0x7f/0x430 [ 844.051451] cpuidle_enter+0x2d/0x40 [ 844.054279] do_idle+0x1d4/0x240 [ 844.057096] cpu_startup_entry+0x2a/0x30 [ 844.059934] start_secondary+0x104/0x130 [ 844.062787] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x16b/0x16b [ 844.065674] </TASK> Fixes: b57dc7c ("net/sched: Introduce action ct") Signed-off-by: Tao Liu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit ca34d81 ] This reverts commit 4d56a4f. The DMA-fence annotations cause a lockdep warning (see below). As per https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/462170/ it sounds like the annotations don't work correctly. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.6.0-rc2+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kmstest/733 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8000819377f0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x58/0x2d4 but task is already holding lock: ffff800081a06aa0 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: tidss_atomic_commit_tail+0x20/0xc0 [tidss] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: __dma_fence_might_wait+0x5c/0xd0 dma_resv_lockdep+0x1a4/0x32c do_one_initcall+0x84/0x2fc kernel_init_freeable+0x28c/0x4c4 kernel_init+0x24/0x1dc ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #1 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x70/0xe4 __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x58/0x2d4 kmalloc_trace+0x38/0x78 __kthread_create_worker+0x3c/0x150 kthread_create_worker+0x64/0x8c workqueue_init+0x1e8/0x2f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x11c/0x4c4 kernel_init+0x24/0x1dc ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1370/0x20d8 lock_acquire+0x1e8/0x308 fs_reclaim_acquire+0xd0/0xe4 __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x58/0x2d4 __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x58/0xf0 kmemdup+0x34/0x60 regmap_bulk_write+0x64/0x2c0 tc358768_bridge_pre_enable+0x8c/0x12d0 [tc358768] drm_atomic_bridge_call_pre_enable+0x68/0x80 [drm] drm_atomic_bridge_chain_pre_enable+0x50/0x158 [drm] drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables+0x164/0x264 [drm_kms_helper] tidss_atomic_commit_tail+0x58/0xc0 [tidss] commit_tail+0xa0/0x188 [drm_kms_helper] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x1a8/0x1c0 [drm_kms_helper] drm_atomic_commit+0xa8/0xe0 [drm] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x9ec/0xc80 [drm] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xc4/0x170 [drm] drm_ioctl+0x234/0x4b0 [drm] drm_compat_ioctl+0x110/0x12c [drm] __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0x128/0x150 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc_compat+0x1c/0x38 el0_svc_compat+0x48/0xb4 el0t_32_sync_handler+0xb0/0x138 el0t_32_sync+0x194/0x198 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: fs_reclaim --> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start --> dma_fence_map Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(dma_fence_map); lock(mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start); lock(dma_fence_map); lock(fs_reclaim); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kmstest/733: #0: ffff800082e5bba0 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x118/0xc80 [drm] #1: ffff000004224c88 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: modeset_lock+0xdc/0x1a0 [drm] #2: ffff800081a06aa0 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: tidss_atomic_commit_tail+0x20/0xc0 [tidss] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 733 Comm: kmstest Not tainted 6.6.0-rc2+ #1 Hardware name: Toradex Verdin AM62 on Verdin Development Board (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x98/0x118 show_stack+0x18/0x24 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xac dump_stack+0x18/0x24 print_circular_bug+0x288/0x368 check_noncircular+0x168/0x17c __lock_acquire+0x1370/0x20d8 lock_acquire+0x1e8/0x308 fs_reclaim_acquire+0xd0/0xe4 __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x58/0x2d4 __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x58/0xf0 kmemdup+0x34/0x60 regmap_bulk_write+0x64/0x2c0 tc358768_bridge_pre_enable+0x8c/0x12d0 [tc358768] drm_atomic_bridge_call_pre_enable+0x68/0x80 [drm] drm_atomic_bridge_chain_pre_enable+0x50/0x158 [drm] drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables+0x164/0x264 [drm_kms_helper] tidss_atomic_commit_tail+0x58/0xc0 [tidss] commit_tail+0xa0/0x188 [drm_kms_helper] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x1a8/0x1c0 [drm_kms_helper] drm_atomic_commit+0xa8/0xe0 [drm] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x9ec/0xc80 [drm] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xc4/0x170 [drm] drm_ioctl+0x234/0x4b0 [drm] drm_compat_ioctl+0x110/0x12c [drm] __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0x128/0x150 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc_compat+0x1c/0x38 el0_svc_compat+0x48/0xb4 el0t_32_sync_handler+0xb0/0x138 el0t_32_sync+0x194/0x198 Fixes: 4d56a4f ("drm/tidss: Annotate dma-fence critical section in commit path") Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230920-dma-fence-annotation-revert-v1-1-7ebf6f7f5bf6@ideasonboard.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 9d7c8c0 ] This reverts commit 250aa22. The DMA-fence annotations cause a lockdep warning (see below). As per https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/462170/ it sounds like the annotations don't work correctly. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc2+ #2 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kmstest/219 is trying to acquire lock: c4705838 (&hdmi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hdmi5_bridge_mode_set+0x1c/0x50 but task is already holding lock: c11e1128 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: omap_atomic_commit_tail+0x14/0xbc which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: __dma_fence_might_wait+0x48/0xb4 dma_resv_lockdep+0x1b8/0x2bc do_one_initcall+0x68/0x3b0 kernel_init_freeable+0x260/0x34c kernel_init+0x14/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x70/0xa8 __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x3c/0x368 kmalloc_trace+0x28/0x58 _drm_do_get_edid+0x7c/0x35c hdmi5_bridge_get_edid+0xc8/0x1ac drm_bridge_connector_get_modes+0x64/0xc0 drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes+0x170/0x528 drm_client_modeset_probe+0x208/0x1334 __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x30/0x548 omap_fbdev_client_hotplug+0x3c/0x6c drm_client_register+0x58/0x94 pdev_probe+0x544/0x6b0 platform_probe+0x58/0xbc really_probe+0xd8/0x3fc __driver_probe_device+0x94/0x1f4 driver_probe_device+0x2c/0xc4 __device_attach_driver+0xa4/0x11c bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xdc __device_attach+0xac/0x20c bus_probe_device+0x8c/0x90 device_add+0x588/0x7e0 platform_device_add+0x110/0x24c platform_device_register_full+0x108/0x15c dss_bind+0x90/0xc0 try_to_bring_up_aggregate_device+0x1e0/0x2c8 __component_add+0xa4/0x174 hdmi5_probe+0x1c8/0x270 platform_probe+0x58/0xbc really_probe+0xd8/0x3fc __driver_probe_device+0x94/0x1f4 driver_probe_device+0x2c/0xc4 __device_attach_driver+0xa4/0x11c bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xdc __device_attach+0xac/0x20c bus_probe_device+0x8c/0x90 deferred_probe_work_func+0x8c/0xd8 process_one_work+0x2ac/0x6e4 worker_thread+0x30/0x4ec kthread+0x100/0x124 ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 -> #0 (&hdmi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x145c/0x29cc lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x258 __mutex_lock+0x90/0x950 mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 hdmi5_bridge_mode_set+0x1c/0x50 drm_bridge_chain_mode_set+0x48/0x5c crtc_set_mode+0x188/0x1d0 omap_atomic_commit_tail+0x2c/0xbc commit_tail+0x9c/0x188 drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x158/0x18c drm_atomic_commit+0xa4/0xe8 drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x9a4/0xc38 drm_ioctl+0x210/0x4a8 sys_ioctl+0x138/0xf00 ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &hdmi->lock --> fs_reclaim --> dma_fence_map Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(dma_fence_map); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(dma_fence_map); lock(&hdmi->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kmstest/219: #0: f1011de4 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0xf0/0xc38 #1: c47059c8 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: modeset_lock+0xf8/0x230 #2: c11e1128 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: omap_atomic_commit_tail+0x14/0xbc stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 219 Comm: kmstest Not tainted 6.5.0-rc2+ #2 Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree) unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0x70 dump_stack_lvl from check_noncircular+0x164/0x198 check_noncircular from __lock_acquire+0x145c/0x29cc __lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x258 lock_acquire.part.0 from __mutex_lock+0x90/0x950 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 mutex_lock_nested from hdmi5_bridge_mode_set+0x1c/0x50 hdmi5_bridge_mode_set from drm_bridge_chain_mode_set+0x48/0x5c drm_bridge_chain_mode_set from crtc_set_mode+0x188/0x1d0 crtc_set_mode from omap_atomic_commit_tail+0x2c/0xbc omap_atomic_commit_tail from commit_tail+0x9c/0x188 commit_tail from drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x158/0x18c drm_atomic_helper_commit from drm_atomic_commit+0xa4/0xe8 drm_atomic_commit from drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x9a4/0xc38 drm_mode_atomic_ioctl from drm_ioctl+0x210/0x4a8 drm_ioctl from sys_ioctl+0x138/0xf00 sys_ioctl from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c Exception stack(0xf1011fa8 to 0xf1011ff0) 1fa0: 00466d58 be9ab510 00000003 c03864bc be9ab510 be9ab4e0 1fc0: 00466d58 be9ab510 c03864bc 00000036 00466ef0 00466fc0 00467020 00466f20 1fe0: b6bc7ef4 be9ab4d0 b6bbbb00 b6cb2cc0 Fixes: 250aa22 ("drm/omapdrm: Annotate dma-fence critical section in commit path") Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230920-dma-fence-annotation-revert-v1-2-7ebf6f7f5bf6@ideasonboard.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 2b44760 ] Running the following two commands in parallel on a multi-processor AArch64 machine can sporadically produce an unexpected warning about duplicate histogram entries: $ while true; do echo hist:key=id.syscall:val=hitcount > \ /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/raw_syscalls/sys_enter/trigger cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/raw_syscalls/sys_enter/hist sleep 0.001 done $ stress-ng --sysbadaddr $(nproc) The warning looks as follows: [ 2911.172474] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2911.173111] Duplicates detected: 1 [ 2911.173574] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 12247 at kernel/trace/tracing_map.c:983 tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408 [ 2911.174702] Modules linked in: iscsi_ibft(E) iscsi_boot_sysfs(E) rfkill(E) af_packet(E) nls_iso8859_1(E) nls_cp437(E) vfat(E) fat(E) ena(E) tiny_power_button(E) qemu_fw_cfg(E) button(E) fuse(E) efi_pstore(E) ip_tables(E) x_tables(E) xfs(E) libcrc32c(E) aes_ce_blk(E) aes_ce_cipher(E) crct10dif_ce(E) polyval_ce(E) polyval_generic(E) ghash_ce(E) gf128mul(E) sm4_ce_gcm(E) sm4_ce_ccm(E) sm4_ce(E) sm4_ce_cipher(E) sm4(E) sm3_ce(E) sm3(E) sha3_ce(E) sha512_ce(E) sha512_arm64(E) sha2_ce(E) sha256_arm64(E) nvme(E) sha1_ce(E) nvme_core(E) nvme_auth(E) t10_pi(E) sg(E) scsi_mod(E) scsi_common(E) efivarfs(E) [ 2911.174738] Unloaded tainted modules: cppc_cpufreq(E):1 [ 2911.180985] CPU: 2 PID: 12247 Comm: cat Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.7.0-default #2 1b58bbb22c97e4399dc09f92d309344f69c44a01 [ 2911.182398] Hardware name: Amazon EC2 c7g.8xlarge/, BIOS 1.0 11/1/2018 [ 2911.183208] pstate: 61400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 2911.184038] pc : tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408 [ 2911.184667] lr : tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408 [ 2911.185310] sp : ffff8000a1513900 [ 2911.185750] x29: ffff8000a1513900 x28: ffff0003f272fe80 x27: 0000000000000001 [ 2911.186600] x26: ffff0003f272fe80 x25: 0000000000000030 x24: 0000000000000008 [ 2911.187458] x23: ffff0003c5788000 x22: ffff0003c16710c8 x21: ffff80008017f180 [ 2911.188310] x20: ffff80008017f000 x19: ffff80008017f180 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 2911.189160] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffff8000a15134b8 [ 2911.190015] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 205d373432323154 x12: 5b5d313131333731 [ 2911.190844] x11: 00000000fffeffff x10: 00000000fffeffff x9 : ffffd1b78274a13c [ 2911.191716] x8 : 000000000017ffe8 x7 : c0000000fffeffff x6 : 000000000057ffa8 [ 2911.192554] x5 : ffff0012f6c24ec0 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffff2e5b72b5d000 [ 2911.193404] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff0003ff254480 [ 2911.194259] Call trace: [ 2911.194626] tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408 [ 2911.195220] hist_show+0x124/0x800 [ 2911.195692] seq_read_iter+0x1d4/0x4e8 [ 2911.196193] seq_read+0xe8/0x138 [ 2911.196638] vfs_read+0xc8/0x300 [ 2911.197078] ksys_read+0x70/0x108 [ 2911.197534] __arm64_sys_read+0x24/0x38 [ 2911.198046] invoke_syscall+0x78/0x108 [ 2911.198553] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xd0/0xf8 [ 2911.199157] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x40 [ 2911.199613] el0_svc+0x40/0x178 [ 2911.200048] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158 [ 2911.200621] el0t_64_sync+0x1a8/0x1b0 [ 2911.201115] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The problem appears to be caused by CPU reordering of writes issued from __tracing_map_insert(). The check for the presence of an element with a given key in this function is: val = READ_ONCE(entry->val); if (val && keys_match(key, val->key, map->key_size)) ... The write of a new entry is: elt = get_free_elt(map); memcpy(elt->key, key, map->key_size); entry->val = elt; The "memcpy(elt->key, key, map->key_size);" and "entry->val = elt;" stores may become visible in the reversed order on another CPU. This second CPU might then incorrectly determine that a new key doesn't match an already present val->key and subsequently insert a new element, resulting in a duplicate. Fix the problem by adding a write barrier between "memcpy(elt->key, key, map->key_size);" and "entry->val = elt;", and for good measure, also use WRITE_ONCE(entry->val, elt) for publishing the element. The sequence pairs with the mentioned "READ_ONCE(entry->val);" and the "val->key" check which has an address dependency. The barrier is placed on a path executed when adding an element for a new key. Subsequent updates targeting the same key remain unaffected. From the user's perspective, the issue was introduced by commit c193707 ("tracing: Remove code which merges duplicates"), which followed commit cbf4100 ("tracing: Add support to detect and avoid duplicates"). The previous code operated differently; it inherently expected potential races which result in duplicates but merged them later when they occurred. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/[email protected] Fixes: c193707 ("tracing: Remove code which merges duplicates") Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <[email protected]> Acked-by: Tom Zanussi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

…volume commit 7081929 upstream. If the source file descriptor to the snapshot ioctl refers to a deleted subvolume, we get the following abort: BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 833 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1875 create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] Modules linked in: pata_acpi btrfs ata_piix libata scsi_mod virtio_net blake2b_generic xor net_failover virtio_rng failover scsi_common rng_core raid6_pq libcrc32c CPU: 0 PID: 833 Comm: t_snapshot_dele Not tainted 6.7.0-rc6 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffa09c01337af8 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9982053e7c78 RCX: 0000000000000027 RDX: ffff99827dc20848 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff99827dc20840 RBP: ffffa09c01337c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa09c01337998 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffffb96da248 R12: fffffffffffffffe R13: ffff99820535bb28 R14: ffff99820b7bd000 R15: ffff99820381ea80 FS: 00007fe20aadabc0(0000) GS:ffff99827dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000559a120b502f CR3: 00000000055b6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? __warn+0x81/0x130 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? report_bug+0x171/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x3a/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] create_pending_snapshots+0x92/0xc0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x66b/0xf40 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x301/0x4d0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x80/0xb0 [btrfs] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x1c2/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xc4/0x150 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x8a6/0x2650 [btrfs] ? kmem_cache_free+0x22/0x340 ? do_sys_openat2+0x97/0xe0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x46/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 RIP: 0033:0x7fe20abe83af RSP: 002b:00007ffe6eff1360 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fe20abe83af RDX: 00007ffe6eff23c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fe20ad16cd0 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffe6eff13c0 R14: 00007fe20ad45000 R15: 0000559a120b6d58 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- BTRFS: error (device vdc: state A) in create_pending_snapshot:1875: errno=-2 No such entry BTRFS info (device vdc: state EA): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device vdc: state EA): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS: error (device vdc: state EA) in cleanup_transaction:2055: errno=-2 No such entry This happens because create_pending_snapshot() initializes the new root item as a copy of the source root item. This includes the refs field, which is 0 for a deleted subvolume. The call to btrfs_insert_root() therefore inserts a root with refs == 0. btrfs_get_new_fs_root() then finds the root and returns -ENOENT if refs == 0, which causes create_pending_snapshot() to abort. Fix it by checking the source root's refs before attempting the snapshot, but after locking subvol_sem to avoid racing with deletion. CC: [email protected] # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 169410e ] These three bpf_map_{lookup,update,delete}_elem() helpers are also available for sleepable bpf program, so add the corresponding lock assertion for sleepable bpf program, otherwise the following warning will be reported when a sleepable bpf program manipulates bpf map under interpreter mode (aka bpf_jit_enable=0): WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4985 at kernel/bpf/helpers.c:40 ...... CPU: 3 PID: 4985 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 6.6.0+ #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) ...... RIP: 0010:bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60 ...... Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn+0xa5/0x240 ? bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60 ? report_bug+0x1ba/0x1f0 ? handle_bug+0x40/0x80 ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x50 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 ? __pfx_bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x10/0x10 ? rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online+0x65/0xb0 ? rcu_is_watching+0x23/0x50 ? bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60 ? __pfx_bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x10/0x10 ___bpf_prog_run+0x513/0x3b70 __bpf_prog_run32+0x9d/0xd0 ? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur+0xad/0x120 ? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur+0x3e/0x120 bpf_trampoline_6442580665+0x4d/0x1000 __x64_sys_getpgid+0x5/0x30 ? do_syscall_64+0x36/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 </TASK> Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit fc3a553 ] An issue occurred while reading an ELF file in libbpf.c during fuzzing: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206 4206 in libbpf.c (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206 #1 0x000000000094f9d6 in bpf_object.collect_relos () at libbpf.c:6706 #2 0x000000000092bef3 in bpf_object_open () at libbpf.c:7437 #3 0x000000000092c046 in bpf_object.open_mem () at libbpf.c:7497 #4 0x0000000000924afa in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput () at fuzz/bpf-object-fuzzer.c:16 #5 0x000000000060be11 in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::Fuzzer::run_one () #6 0x000000000087ad92 in tracing::span::Span::in_scope () #7 0x00000000006078aa in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::util::walkdir () #8 0x00000000005f3217 in testblitz_engine::entrypoint::main::{{closure}} () torvalds#9 0x00000000005f2601 in main () (gdb) scn_data was null at this code(tools/lib/bpf/src/libbpf.c): if (rel->r_offset % BPF_INSN_SZ || rel->r_offset >= scn_data->d_size) { The scn_data is derived from the code above: scn = elf_sec_by_idx(obj, sec_idx); scn_data = elf_sec_data(obj, scn); relo_sec_name = elf_sec_str(obj, shdr->sh_name); sec_name = elf_sec_name(obj, scn); if (!relo_sec_name || !sec_name)// don't check whether scn_data is NULL return -EINVAL; In certain special scenarios, such as reading a malformed ELF file, it is possible that scn_data may be a null pointer Signed-off-by: Mingyi Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Changye Wu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 47bf0f8 ] ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-kfd-fkuehlin torvalds#276 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/8:2/2676 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9435aae95c88 ((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x52/0x550 but task is already holding lock: ffff9435cd8e1720 (&svms->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: svm_range_deferred_list_work+0xe8/0x340 [amdgpu] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&svms->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x97/0xd30 kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu+0x6d/0x3c0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl+0x1b2/0x5d0 [amdgpu] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x86/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x42/0x160 svm_range_evict_svm_bo_worker+0x8b/0x340 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x27a/0x540 worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0 kthread+0xeb/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1426/0x2200 lock_acquire+0xc1/0x2b0 __flush_work+0x80/0x550 __cancel_work_timer+0x109/0x190 svm_range_bo_release+0xdc/0x1c0 [amdgpu] svm_range_free+0x175/0x180 [amdgpu] svm_range_deferred_list_work+0x15d/0x340 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x27a/0x540 worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0 kthread+0xeb/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work) --> &mm->mmap_lock --> &svms->lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&svms->lock); lock(&mm->mmap_lock); lock(&svms->lock); lock((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work)); I believe this cannot really lead to a deadlock in practice, because svm_range_evict_svm_bo_worker only takes the mmap_read_lock if the BO refcount is non-0. That means it's impossible that svm_range_bo_release is running concurrently. However, there is no good way to annotate this. To avoid the problem, take a BO reference in svm_range_schedule_evict_svm_bo instead of in the worker. That way it's impossible for a BO to get freed while eviction work is pending and the cancel_work_sync call in svm_range_bo_release can be eliminated. v2: Use svm_bo_ref_unless_zero and explained why that's safe. Also removed redundant checks that are already done in amdkfd_fence_enable_signaling. Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Philip Yang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 2a9de42 ] ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-kfd-yangp #2289 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:2/996 is trying to acquire lock: (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: __synchronize_srcu+0x5/0x1a0 but task is already holding lock: ((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x211/0x560 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 ((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0 svm_range_list_lock_and_flush_work+0x3d/0x110 [amdgpu] svm_range_set_attr+0xd6/0x14c0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl+0x1d1/0x630 [amdgpu] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0 -> #2 (&info->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc70 amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_restore_process_bos+0x54/0x740 [amdgpu] restore_process_helper+0x22/0x80 [amdgpu] restore_process_worker+0x2d/0xa0 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x29b/0x560 worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&(&process->restore_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0 __cancel_work_timer+0x12c/0x1c0 kfd_process_notifier_release_internal+0x37/0x1f0 [amdgpu] __mmu_notifier_release+0xad/0x240 exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0 mmput+0x6a/0x120 do_exit+0x322/0xb90 do_group_exit+0x37/0xa0 __x64_sys_exit_group+0x18/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80 -> #0 (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1521/0x2510 lock_sync+0x5f/0x90 __synchronize_srcu+0x4f/0x1a0 __mmu_notifier_release+0x128/0x240 exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0 mmput+0x6a/0x120 svm_range_deferred_list_work+0x19f/0x350 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x29b/0x560 worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: srcu --> &info->lock#2 --> (work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work) Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)); lock(&info->lock#2); lock((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)); sync(srcu); Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 3d65860 ] Patch series "mm: follow_pte() improvements and acrn follow_pte() fixes". Patch #1 fixes a bunch of issues I spotted in the acrn driver. It compiles, that's all I know. I'll appreciate some review and testing from acrn folks. Patch #2+#3 improve follow_pte(), passing a VMA instead of the MM, adding more sanity checks, and improving the documentation. Gave it a quick test on x86-64 using VM_PAT that ends up using follow_pte(). This patch (of 3): We currently miss handling various cases, resulting in a dangerous follow_pte() (previously follow_pfn()) usage. (1) We're not checking PTE write permissions. Maybe we should simply always require pte_write() like we do for pin_user_pages_fast(FOLL_WRITE)? Hard to tell, so let's check for ACRN_MEM_ACCESS_WRITE for now. (2) We're not rejecting refcounted pages. As we are not using MMU notifiers, messing with refcounted pages is dangerous and can result in use-after-free. Let's make sure to reject them. (3) We are only looking at the first PTE of a bigger range. We only lookup a single PTE, but memmap->len may span a larger area. Let's loop over all involved PTEs and make sure the PFN range is actually contiguous. Reject everything else: it couldn't have worked either way, and rather made use access PFNs we shouldn't be accessing. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 8a6e85f ("virt: acrn: obtain pa from VMA with PFNMAP flag") Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> Cc: Alex Williamson <[email protected]> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Cc: Fei Li <[email protected]> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]> Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> Cc: Yonghua Huang <[email protected]> Cc: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 88ce010 ] The session has a header in it which contains a perf env with bpf_progs. The bpf_progs are accessed by the sideband thread and so the sideband thread must be stopped before the session is deleted, to avoid a use after free. This error was detected by AddressSanitizer in the following: ==2054673==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x61d000161e00 at pc 0x55769289de54 bp 0x7f9df36d4ab0 sp 0x7f9df36d4aa8 READ of size 8 at 0x61d000161e00 thread T1 #0 0x55769289de53 in __perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info util/env.c:42 #1 0x55769289dbb1 in perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info util/env.c:29 #2 0x557692bbae29 in perf_env__add_bpf_info util/bpf-event.c:483 #3 0x557692bbb01a in bpf_event__sb_cb util/bpf-event.c:512 #4 0x5576928b75f4 in perf_evlist__poll_thread util/sideband_evlist.c:68 #5 0x7f9df96a63eb in start_thread nptl/pthread_create.c:444 #6 0x7f9df9726a4b in clone3 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:81 0x61d000161e00 is located 384 bytes inside of 2136-byte region [0x61d000161c80,0x61d0001624d8) freed by thread T0 here: #0 0x7f9dfa6d7288 in __interceptor_free libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:52 #1 0x557692978d50 in perf_session__delete util/session.c:319 #2 0x557692673959 in __cmd_record tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2884 #3 0x55769267a9f0 in cmd_record tools/perf/builtin-record.c:4259 #4 0x55769286710c in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:349 #5 0x557692867678 in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:402 #6 0x557692867a40 in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:446 #7 0x557692867fae in main tools/perf/perf.c:562 #8 0x7f9df96456c9 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58 Fixes: 657ee55 ("perf evlist: Introduce side band thread") Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Athira Rajeev <[email protected]> Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]> Cc: Disha Goel <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: James Clark <[email protected]> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Kajol Jain <[email protected]> Cc: Kan Liang <[email protected]> Cc: K Prateek Nayak <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Song Liu <[email protected]> Cc: Tim Chen <[email protected]> Cc: Yicong Yang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 769e6a1 ] ui_browser__show() is capturing the input title that is stack allocated memory in hist_browser__run(). Avoid a use after return by strdup-ing the string. Committer notes: Further explanation from Ian Rogers: My command line using tui is: $ sudo bash -c 'rm /tmp/asan.log*; export ASAN_OPTIONS="log_path=/tmp/asan.log"; /tmp/perf/perf mem record -a sleep 1; /tmp/perf/perf mem report' I then go to the perf annotate view and quit. This triggers the asan error (from the log file): ``` ==1254591==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-return on address 0x7f2813331920 at pc 0x7f28180 65991 bp 0x7fff0a21c750 sp 0x7fff0a21bf10 READ of size 80 at 0x7f2813331920 thread T0 #0 0x7f2818065990 in __interceptor_strlen ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:461 #1 0x7f2817698251 in SLsmg_write_wrapped_string (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libslang.so.2+0x98251) #2 0x7f28176984b9 in SLsmg_write_nstring (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libslang.so.2+0x984b9) #3 0x55c94045b365 in ui_browser__write_nstring ui/browser.c:60 #4 0x55c94045c558 in __ui_browser__show_title ui/browser.c:266 #5 0x55c94045c776 in ui_browser__show ui/browser.c:288 #6 0x55c94045c06d in ui_browser__handle_resize ui/browser.c:206 #7 0x55c94047979b in do_annotate ui/browsers/hists.c:2458 #8 0x55c94047fb17 in evsel__hists_browse ui/browsers/hists.c:3412 torvalds#9 0x55c940480a0c in perf_evsel_menu__run ui/browsers/hists.c:3527 torvalds#10 0x55c940481108 in __evlist__tui_browse_hists ui/browsers/hists.c:3613 torvalds#11 0x55c9404813f7 in evlist__tui_browse_hists ui/browsers/hists.c:3661 torvalds#12 0x55c93ffa253f in report__browse_hists tools/perf/builtin-report.c:671 torvalds#13 0x55c93ffa58ca in __cmd_report tools/perf/builtin-report.c:1141 torvalds#14 0x55c93ffaf159 in cmd_report tools/perf/builtin-report.c:1805 torvalds#15 0x55c94000c05c in report_events tools/perf/builtin-mem.c:374 torvalds#16 0x55c94000d96d in cmd_mem tools/perf/builtin-mem.c:516 torvalds#17 0x55c9400e44ee in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:350 torvalds#18 0x55c9400e4a5a in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:403 torvalds#19 0x55c9400e4e22 in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:447 torvalds#20 0x55c9400e53ad in main tools/perf/perf.c:561 torvalds#21 0x7f28170456c9 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58 torvalds#22 0x7f2817045784 in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360 torvalds#23 0x55c93ff544c0 in _start (/tmp/perf/perf+0x19a4c0) (BuildId: 84899b0e8c7d3a3eaa67b2eb35e3d8b2f8cd4c93) Address 0x7f2813331920 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 32 in frame #0 0x55c94046e85e in hist_browser__run ui/browsers/hists.c:746 This frame has 1 object(s): [32, 192) 'title' (line 747) <== Memory access at offset 32 is inside this variable HINT: this may be a false positive if your program uses some custom stack unwind mechanism, swapcontext or vfork ``` hist_browser__run isn't on the stack so the asan error looks legit. There's no clean init/exit on struct ui_browser so I may be trading a use-after-return for a memory leak, but that seems look a good trade anyway. Fixes: 05e8b08 ("perf ui browser: Stop using 'self'") Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> Cc: Athira Rajeev <[email protected]> Cc: Ben Gainey <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: James Clark <[email protected]> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Kajol Jain <[email protected]> Cc: Kan Liang <[email protected]> Cc: K Prateek Nayak <[email protected]> Cc: Li Dong <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Cc: Oliver Upton <[email protected]> Cc: Paran Lee <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi Bangoria <[email protected]> Cc: Sun Haiyong <[email protected]> Cc: Tim Chen <[email protected]> Cc: Yanteng Si <[email protected]> Cc: Yicong Yang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 3ebc46c ] In dctcp_update_alpha(), we use a module parameter dctcp_shift_g as follows: alpha -= min_not_zero(alpha, alpha >> dctcp_shift_g); ... delivered_ce <<= (10 - dctcp_shift_g); It seems syzkaller started fuzzing module parameters and triggered shift-out-of-bounds [0] by setting 100 to dctcp_shift_g: memcpy((void*)0x20000080, "/sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\000", 47); res = syscall(__NR_openat, /*fd=*/0xffffffffffffff9cul, /*file=*/0x20000080ul, /*flags=*/2ul, /*mode=*/0ul); memcpy((void*)0x20000000, "100\000", 4); syscall(__NR_write, /*fd=*/r[0], /*val=*/0x20000000ul, /*len=*/4ul); Let's limit the max value of dctcp_shift_g by param_set_uint_minmax(). With this patch: # echo 10 > /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g # cat /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g 10 # echo 11 > /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [0]: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c:143:12 shift exponent 100 is too large for 32-bit type 'u32' (aka 'unsigned int') CPU: 0 PID: 8083 Comm: syz-executor345 Not tainted 6.9.0-05151-g1b294a1f3561 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x201/0x300 lib/dump_stack.c:114 ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:231 [inline] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x346/0x3a0 lib/ubsan.c:468 dctcp_update_alpha+0x540/0x570 net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c:143 tcp_in_ack_event net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3802 [inline] tcp_ack+0x17b1/0x3bc0 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3948 tcp_rcv_state_process+0x57a/0x2290 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6711 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x764/0xc40 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1937 sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1106 [inline] __release_sock+0x20f/0x350 net/core/sock.c:2983 release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3549 mptcp_subflow_shutdown+0x3d0/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2907 mptcp_check_send_data_fin+0x225/0x410 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2976 __mptcp_close+0x238/0xad0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3072 mptcp_close+0x2a/0x1a0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3127 inet_release+0x190/0x1f0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:437 __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline] sock_close+0xc0/0x240 net/socket.c:1421 __fput+0x41b/0x890 fs/file_table.c:422 task_work_run+0x23b/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:180 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline] do_exit+0x9c8/0x2540 kernel/exit.c:878 do_group_exit+0x201/0x2b0 kernel/exit.c:1027 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1038 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1036 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1036 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xe4/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f RIP: 0033:0x7f6c2b5005b6 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f6c2b50058c. RSP: 002b:00007ffe883eb948 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6c2b5862f0 RCX: 00007f6c2b5005b6 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 000000000000003c RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 00000000000000e7 R09: ffffffffffffffc0 R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f6c2b5862f0 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 </TASK> Reported-by: syzkaller <[email protected]> Reported-by: Yue Sun <[email protected]> Reported-by: xingwei lee <[email protected]> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAEkJfYNJM=cw-8x7_Vmj1J6uYVCWMbbvD=EFmDPVBGpTsqOxEA@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: e3118e8 ("net: tcp: add DCTCP congestion control algorithm") Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

…PLES event" commit 5b3cde1 upstream. This reverts commit 7d1405c. This causes segfaults in some cases, as reported by Milian: ``` sudo /usr/bin/perf record -z --call-graph dwarf -e cycles -e raw_syscalls:sys_enter ls ... [ perf record: Woken up 3 times to write data ] malloc(): invalid next size (unsorted) Aborted ``` Backtrace with GDB + debuginfod: ``` malloc(): invalid next size (unsorted) Thread 1 "perf" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44 Downloading source file /usr/src/debug/glibc/glibc/nptl/pthread_kill.c 44 return INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P (ret) ? INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO (ret) : 0; (gdb) bt #0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44 #1 0x00007ffff6ea8eb3 in __pthread_kill_internal (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=6) at pthread_kill.c:78 #2 0x00007ffff6e50a30 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/ raise.c:26 #3 0x00007ffff6e384c3 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79 #4 0x00007ffff6e39354 in __libc_message_impl (fmt=fmt@entry=0x7ffff6fc22ea "%s\n") at ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:132 #5 0x00007ffff6eb3085 in malloc_printerr (str=str@entry=0x7ffff6fc5850 "malloc(): invalid next size (unsorted)") at malloc.c:5772 #6 0x00007ffff6eb657c in _int_malloc (av=av@entry=0x7ffff6ff6ac0 <main_arena>, bytes=bytes@entry=368) at malloc.c:4081 #7 0x00007ffff6eb877e in __libc_calloc (n=<optimized out>, elem_size=<optimized out>) at malloc.c:3754 #8 0x000055555569bdb6 in perf_session.do_write_header () torvalds#9 0x00005555555a373a in __cmd_record.constprop.0 () torvalds#10 0x00005555555a6846 in cmd_record () torvalds#11 0x000055555564db7f in run_builtin () torvalds#12 0x000055555558ed77 in main () ``` Valgrind memcheck: ``` ==45136== Invalid write of size 8 ==45136== at 0x2B38A5: perf_event__synthesize_id_sample (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x157069: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== Address 0x6a866a8 is 0 bytes after a block of size 40 alloc'd ==45136== at 0x4849BF3: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:1675) ==45136== by 0x3574AB: zalloc (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x1570E0: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== ==45136== Syscall param write(buf) points to unaddressable byte(s) ==45136== at 0x575953D: __libc_write (write.c:26) ==45136== by 0x575953D: write (write.c:24) ==45136== by 0x35761F: ion (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x357778: writen (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x1548F7: record__write (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x15708A: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== Address 0x6a866a8 is 0 bytes after a block of size 40 alloc'd ==45136== at 0x4849BF3: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:1675) ==45136== by 0x3574AB: zalloc (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x1570E0: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf) ==45136== ----- Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/23879991.0LEYPuXRzz@milian-workstation/ Reported-by: Milian Wolff <[email protected]> Tested-by: Milian Wolff <[email protected]> Cc: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Kan Liang <[email protected]> Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] # 6.8+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zl9ksOlHJHnKM70p@x1 Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit 9d274c1 upstream. We have been seeing crashes on duplicate keys in btrfs_set_item_key_safe(): BTRFS critical (device vdb): slot 4 key (450 108 8192) new key (450 108 8192) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 0 PID: 3139 Comm: xfs_io Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0 #6 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0x11f/0x290 [btrfs] With the following stack trace: #0 btrfs_set_item_key_safe (fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620:4) #1 btrfs_drop_extents (fs/btrfs/file.c:411:4) #2 log_one_extent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4732:9) #3 btrfs_log_changed_extents (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4955:9) #4 btrfs_log_inode (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6626:9) #5 btrfs_log_inode_parent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7070:8) #6 btrfs_log_dentry_safe (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7171:8) #7 btrfs_sync_file (fs/btrfs/file.c:1933:8) #8 vfs_fsync_range (fs/sync.c:188:9) torvalds#9 vfs_fsync (fs/sync.c:202:9) torvalds#10 do_fsync (fs/sync.c:212:9) torvalds#11 __do_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:225:9) torvalds#12 __se_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1) torvalds#13 __x64_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1) torvalds#14 do_syscall_x64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52:14) torvalds#15 do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83:7) torvalds#16 entry_SYSCALL_64+0xaf/0x14c (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121) So we're logging a changed extent from fsync, which is splitting an extent in the log tree. But this split part already exists in the tree, triggering the BUG(). This is the state of the log tree at the time of the crash, dumped with drgn (https://github.com/osandov/drgn/blob/main/contrib/btrfs_tree.py) to get more details than btrfs_print_leaf() gives us: >>> print_extent_buffer(prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]["eb"]) leaf 33439744 level 0 items 72 generation 9 owner 18446744073709551610 leaf 33439744 flags 0x100000000000000 fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677 chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da item 0 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 generation 7 transid 9 size 8192 nbytes 8473563889606862198 block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 204 flags 0x10(PREALLOC) atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) ctime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44) mtime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44) otime 17592186044416.000000000 (559444-03-08 01:40:16) item 1 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 16110 itemsize 13 index 195 namelen 3 name: 193 item 2 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 16073 itemsize 37 location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6 name: user.a data a item 3 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 16020 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 12288 extent compression 0 (none) item 4 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 15967 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 2 (prealloc) prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 prealloc data offset 4096 nr 8192 item 5 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 15914 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 2 (prealloc) prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096 ... So the real problem happened earlier: notice that items 4 (4k-12k) and 5 (8k-12k) overlap. Both are prealloc extents. Item 4 straddles i_size and item 5 starts at i_size. Here is the state of the filesystem tree at the time of the crash: >>> root = prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[2]["inode"].root >>> ret, nodes, slots = btrfs_search_slot(root, BtrfsKey(450, 0, 0)) >>> print_extent_buffer(nodes[0]) leaf 30425088 level 0 items 184 generation 9 owner 5 leaf 30425088 flags 0x100000000000000 fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677 chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da ... item 179 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 4907 itemsize 160 generation 7 transid 7 size 4096 nbytes 12288 block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 6 flags 0x10(PREALLOC) atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) ctime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) mtime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) otime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) item 180 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 4894 itemsize 13 index 195 namelen 3 name: 193 item 181 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 4857 itemsize 37 location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6 name: user.a data a item 182 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 4804 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 extent data offset 0 nr 8192 ram 12288 extent compression 0 (none) item 183 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 4751 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 2 (prealloc) prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096 Item 5 in the log tree corresponds to item 183 in the filesystem tree, but nothing matches item 4. Furthermore, item 183 is the last item in the leaf. btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() is responsible for logging prealloc extents beyond i_size. It first truncates any previously logged prealloc extents that start beyond i_size. Then, it walks the filesystem tree and copies the prealloc extent items to the log tree. If it hits the end of a leaf, then it calls btrfs_next_leaf(), which unlocks the tree and does another search. However, while the filesystem tree is unlocked, an ordered extent completion may modify the tree. In particular, it may insert an extent item that overlaps with an extent item that was already copied to the log tree. This may manifest in several ways depending on the exact scenario, including an EEXIST error that is silently translated to a full sync, overlapping items in the log tree, or this crash. This particular crash is triggered by the following sequence of events: - Initially, the file has i_size=4k, a regular extent from 0-4k, and a prealloc extent beyond i_size from 4k-12k. The prealloc extent item is the last item in its B-tree leaf. - The file is fsync'd, which copies its inode item and both extent items to the log tree. - An xattr is set on the file, which sets the BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING flag. - The range 4k-8k in the file is written using direct I/O. i_size is extended to 8k, but the ordered extent is still in flight. - The file is fsync'd. Since BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING is set, this calls copy_inode_items_to_log(), which calls btrfs_log_prealloc_extents(). - btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() finds the 4k-12k prealloc extent in the filesystem tree. Since it starts before i_size, it skips it. Since it is the last item in its B-tree leaf, it calls btrfs_next_leaf(). - btrfs_next_leaf() unlocks the path. - The ordered extent completion runs, which converts the 4k-8k part of the prealloc extent to written and inserts the remaining prealloc part from 8k-12k. - btrfs_next_leaf() does a search and finds the new prealloc extent 8k-12k. - btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() copies the 8k-12k prealloc extent into the log tree. Note that it overlaps with the 4k-12k prealloc extent that was copied to the log tree by the first fsync. - fsync calls btrfs_log_changed_extents(), which tries to log the 4k-8k extent that was written. - This tries to drop the range 4k-8k in the log tree, which requires adjusting the start of the 4k-12k prealloc extent in the log tree to 8k. - btrfs_set_item_key_safe() sees that there is already an extent starting at 8k in the log tree and calls BUG(). Fix this by detecting when we're about to insert an overlapping file extent item in the log tree and truncating the part that would overlap. CC: [email protected] # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

sargun added 2 commits February 11, 2020 20:45

net/ipv6/addrconf: Add the ability to pause the addrconf work queue

6094052

net/ipv6/addrconf: Make addr_check_frequency adjustable

df63075

sargun force-pushed the nflx-v4.19-20200211.0-fix-wq branch from 2d532df to df63075 Compare February 12, 2020 04:45

sargun requested a review from mcbrutus February 12, 2020 06:01

mcbrutus approved these changes Feb 12, 2020

View reviewed changes

sargun merged commit df63075 into nflx-v4.19-20200211.0 Feb 12, 2020

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

net/ipv6/addrconf: Add the ability to pause the addrconf work queue #2

net/ipv6/addrconf: Add the ability to pause the addrconf work queue #2

sargun commented Feb 12, 2020

net/ipv6/addrconf: Add the ability to pause the addrconf work queue #2

net/ipv6/addrconf: Add the ability to pause the addrconf work queue #2

Conversation

sargun commented Feb 12, 2020