Bring back the nice LineEditREPL on Windows #6560
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Windows doesn't have the TERM env var set outside of MSYS/Cygwin, so c8ae026 caused Windows Julia to default to the BasicREPL.
|
+1. @nolta? (travis failure looks unrelated) |
nolta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2014
Bring back the nice LineEditREPL on Windows
This was referenced Nov 21, 2014
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Windows doesn't have the TERM env var set outside of MSYS/Cygwin, so c8ae026 caused Windows Julia to default to the BasicREPL.
The LineEditREPL still has line duplication bugs on Windows (#6488), but overall it's a nicer experience than the BasicREPL.
This may un-fix #6428 on Windows, but I suspect Windows users are more frequently running Julia from cmd or by double-clicking than inside Emacs.