Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should SOneTo be moved to this package? #16

Closed
jishnub opened this issue Jan 11, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Should SOneTo be moved to this package? #16

jishnub opened this issue Jan 11, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@jishnub
Copy link
Member

jishnub commented Jan 11, 2023

While this package currently enables one to define methods for array types, moving SOneTo to this package would make it easier to define methods for the axis type.

@fredrikekre
Copy link
Member

#15

@jishnub
Copy link
Member Author

jishnub commented Jan 12, 2023

While that's certainly the direction for the future, this may be an intermediate step for users on 1.8 and 1.9

@fredrikekre
Copy link
Member

1.9 is about to release, and at that point 1.8 is not maintained anymore, so then we only care about 1.6 (LTS) and 1.9. I think "if you want faster load times, don't use 1.6, upgrade to 1.9" is a reasonable stance.

@jishnub
Copy link
Member Author

jishnub commented Jan 12, 2023

Are weak dependencies available on 1.9? In that case this isn't necessary

@fredrikekre
Copy link
Member

Yes.

@jishnub jishnub closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants