feat: add role-based access control for bridge (backport #1358)

[tkxkd0159]

Description

closes: #XXXX

Motivation and context

How has this been tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Checklist:

• I followed the contributing guidelines and code of conduct.
• I have added a relevant changelog to CHANGELOG.md
• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have updated API documentation client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 30.61798% with 494 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.90%. Comparing base (98da17d) to head (a490670).

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           release/v0.49.x    #1360      +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage            69.33%   68.90%   -0.43%     
===================================================
  Files                  666      675       +9     
  Lines                68371    69140     +769     
===================================================
+ Hits                 47406    47643     +237     
- Misses               18718    19220     +502     
- Partials              2247     2277      +30     

Files	Coverage Δ
simapp/app.go	82.28% <100.00%> (ø)
x/fbridge/types/codec.go	56.75% <50.00%> (ø)
x/fbridge/keeper/params.go	76.92% <76.92%> (ø)
x/fbridge/types/msgs.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/fbridge/types/fbridge.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/fbridge/keeper/keeper.go	68.13% <69.73%> (+15.19%)	⬆️
x/fbridge/types/keys.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/fbridge/types/params.go	39.02% <39.02%> (ø)
x/fbridge/keeper/genesis.go	10.60% <10.00%> (+10.60%)	⬆️
x/fbridge/keeper/abci.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 4 more

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes