𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧:

This research presents a significant advancement in credit card fraud detection by integrating advanced machine learning and deep learning techniques, showcasing the adaptability and precision of models like 𝐑𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐨𝐦 𝐅𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭, 𝐋𝐒𝐓𝐌, 𝐂𝐍𝐍, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐍𝐍 + 𝐋𝐒𝐓𝐌. Key findings include the substantial improvement in model adaptability through hyperparameter tuning, particularly evident in the case of K-Nearest Neighbors. Looking forward, the study emphasizes ongoing innovation, the exploration of cutting-edge algorithms, and the automation of hyperparameter tuning processes for enhanced efficiency. Additionally, it highlights the importance of tailored data balancing techniques beyond 𝐒𝐌𝐎𝐓𝐄 and proposes refining ensemble learning strategies to dynamically adapt to the evolving threat landscape.

𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐄𝐃 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐊𝐅𝐋𝐎𝐖

𝐒𝐔𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐕𝐈𝐒𝐄𝐃 𝐌𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐄 𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐀𝐋𝐆𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐓𝐇𝐌𝐒

1.𝓓𝓔𝓒𝓘𝓢𝓘𝓞𝓝 𝓣𝓡𝓔𝓔

A Decision Tree is a commonly used and easy-to-understand data analysis tool, often depicted as an upside-down tree diagram. Essentially, it segments data into increasingly specific groups, making determinations at each stage. The tree's branches symbolize these choices, where every node presents a query regarding the data, and each subsequent branch illustrates the answer to that query.

2.𝓝𝓐𝓘𝓥𝓔 𝓑𝓐𝓨𝓔𝓢

The Naive Bayes model is rooted in Bayes' theorem, a cornerstone of probabilistic theory. Despite its name suggesting rudimentary attributes, its performance, particularly in text categorization, is notably commendable. The "naive" descriptor arises from the model's underlying presumption that all examined features are independent of one another. While this might seem like an oversimplification, especially when dealing with complex datasets, practical implementations of this algorithm frequently demonstrate its resilience and dependability, countering initial impressions.

3.𝓚𝓝𝓝

The K-Nearest Neighbours method, commonly referred to as KNN, is a notable member of the supervised learning family. Its uncomplicated nature, combined with its efficiency, makes it a favored tool for various analytical endeavors. Essentially, KNN operates on a straightforward principle: within a collection of data, similar data points typically have common characteristics, implying they likely belong to a similar category or cluster.

4.𝓡𝓐𝓝𝓓𝓞𝓜 𝓕𝓞𝓡𝓔𝓢𝓣

Random Forest, a respected ensemble learning technique, works by assembling numerous decision trees throughout its training process. Its structure comprises an array of decision trees, typically educated using the "bagging" approach. The fundamental premise of the bagging strategy is that amalgamating multiple learning models enhances the final performance.

5.𝓐𝓓𝓐𝓑𝓞𝓞𝓢𝓣

Adaboost, a renowned ensemble learning method, belongs to the boosting algorithm family. Its core philosophy is to amend the errors of earlier models through successive refinements. This method constructs a series of decision trees, with each one rectifying the mistakes of its predecessor.

6.𝓝𝓔𝓤𝓡𝓐𝓛 𝓝𝓔𝓣𝓦𝓞𝓡𝓚𝓢(𝓝𝓝)

Neural networks are sophisticated computational models that have found profound applications in various sectors, including the banking industry. These models, characterized by layers of interconnected nodes or "neurons," are adept at capturing intricate patterns in data, much like the human brain's neural connections. The significance or "weight" of these connections is dynamically adjusted as the network learns.

𝐃𝐄𝐄𝐏 𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐀𝐋𝐆𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐓𝐇𝐌𝐒

1.𝓒𝓞𝓝𝓥𝓞𝓛𝓤𝓣𝓘𝓞𝓝𝓐𝓛 𝓝𝓔𝓤𝓡𝓐𝓛 𝓝𝓔𝓣𝓦𝓞𝓡𝓚𝓢 (𝓒𝓝𝓝𝓢)

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), increasingly being employed in the banking sector, especially for credit card fraud detection. CNNs, with their inherent ability to recognize and extract intricate patterns using filters and pooling layers, are particularly suited to detect anomalies in transactional data. The architecture of a CNN comprises several layers, predominantly starting with convolutional layers followed by pooling (or subsampling) layers. During the convolutional phase, filters meticulously scan the input data, which could be transactional patterns or sequences, producing feature maps that spotlight significant transactional trends or anomalies. Subsequently, pooling layers, often utilizing max-pooling, condense these feature maps, focusing on the most prominent transactional patterns. This not only streamlines the network's operations but also bolsters its capability to detect fraud despite minor variations or noise in the transactional data.

2.𝓛𝓢𝓣𝓜

Originating from the expansive domain of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTMs) present an advanced methodology for analyzing sequential data. While conventional RNNs established the foundational principles for sequence processing, they encountered limitations, notably the vanishing and exploding gradient phenomena. LSTMs, through their intricate structure, effectively address these issues, thereby enhancing the efficacy of sequential data interpretation. Central to the LSTM's capabilities is its distinct architecture, which integrates specialized units known as gates. These gates collaboratively manage the information trajectory, ensuring the network adeptly balances the assimilation of new data with the preservation of historical insights.

3.𝓗𝓨𝓑𝓡𝓘𝓓 𝓜𝓞𝓓𝓔𝓛(𝓛𝓢𝓣𝓜+𝓒𝓝𝓝)

The combined model, melding the attributes of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), presents a refined strategy for deciphering sequential data embedded with spatial intricacies. By leveraging the salient features of both LSTM and CNN architectures, this amalgamation paves the way for a more nuanced and comprehensive analysis, especially crucial in the domain of transactional data analysis in the banking sector.

𝐃𝐀𝐓𝐀 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐂𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐍𝐆

Data preprocessing plays a pivotal role in readying data for machine learning algorithms, where the overall goal is to refine the dataset to enhance accuracy and improve model performance. This process involves delving into Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) to comprehend the inherent characteristics and patterns within the dataset. Addressing missing values through effective data cleaning ensures data completeness and reliability. Feature selection is then employed to identify and prioritize the most relevant features for the predictive task at hand. Subsequent feature scaling standardizes the range of independent variables, promoting uniformity in how the model interprets the data. Additionally, class imbalances are addressed using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) to prevent biases during model training. Finally, the dataset is strategically split into training and testing sets to assess model performance accurately.

𝐇𝐘𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐏𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐓𝐄𝐑 𝐎𝐏𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐈𝐙𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐌𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐄 𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐃𝐄𝐄𝐏 𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐌𝐈𝐆 𝐌𝐎𝐃𝐄𝐋𝐒 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝐑𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝𝐒𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐂𝐕

𝐇𝐘𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐏𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐓𝐄𝐑 𝐎𝐏𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐈𝐙𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐌𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐄 𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐃𝐄𝐄𝐏 𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐌𝐈𝐆 𝐌𝐎𝐃𝐄𝐋𝐒 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝐆𝐫𝐢𝐝𝐒𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐂𝐕

𝐄𝐕𝐀𝐋𝐔𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐌𝐄𝐓𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐒

Assessing the performance of a model, especially in classification endeavors, requires a comprehensive suite of metrics that can effectively encapsulate the subtleties and complexities of the output. In this research, four key metrics were employed: Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1-Score. Each metric provides a unique perspective on the model's predictive capabilities, facilitating a well-rounded evaluation.

Outlined metrics collectively form a comprehensive assessment framework meticulously designed to address the multifaceted challenges associated with detecting indicators of credit card fraud.

Accuracy: This metric offers a direct quantification of the overall performance of the model by computing the ratio of correct predictions to the total number of instances. However, the dataset used in this investigation exhibits an inherent class imbalance, with fewer instances of credit card fraud compared to non-fraudulent instances. Consequently, a model could achieve high accuracy by merely predicting the majority class. This limitation renders accuracy inadequate as a standalone metric for evaluation in this study.

Precision: In the sensitive context of credit card fraud detection, minimizing false positives is paramount. False positives could result in the misclassification of legitimate instances such as fraud, diluting the significance and focus on genuine cases. Precision is calculated as the ratio of true positive instances to the sum of true positives and false positives. High precision ensures that the model's positive identifications are relevant, making it a crucial metric for this study.

Recall: Conversely, the detection of credit card fraud is of utmost importance, and overlooking such instances could have serious consequences. The recall metric addresses this by measuring the ratio of true positive instances to the sum of true positives and false negatives. High recall ensures that most of the credit card fraud instances are captured by the model. Given the study's emphasis on comprehensive fraud detection, recall becomes an indispensable metric.

F1-Score: Striking a balance between the trade-off of precision and recall, particularly in the context of imbalanced datasets, is essential for credit card fraud detection. The F1-Score provides a harmonized average of both precision and recall, offering a single metric that encapsulates the model's performance in identifying both the relevance and completeness of the detected credit card fraud instances. Hence, the F1-Score serves as a robust metric for evaluating models in this study.

𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐂𝐋𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒

The conclusion of this research stands as a crucial milestone in the technological advancements aimed at addressing a prominent challenge in credit card fraud detection. In response to the initial research question, the existing credit card fraud detection methods exhibit varying effectiveness in accurately identifying and preventing fraudulent transactions. While traditional methods such as Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, and Naive Bayes show stability, the advanced models like Random Forest, LSTM, CNN, and CNN + LSTM outperform, demonstrating adaptability to evolving fraud tactics.

In the context of credit card emergeetection, the integration of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) techniques emerges as a crucial avenue for refining accuracy and efficiency. Given the constantly evolving landscape of fraudulent activities, employing advanced methods becomes imperative. The study's findings underscore the tangible benefits of these techniques, especially when subjected to meticulous hyperparameter tuning. Noteworthy is the substantial improvement observed in the adaptability of K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), with its accuracy experiencing a remarkable surge from 91.7% to an impressive 99.9% post hyperparameter tuning. These outcomes shed light on the practical significance of ML and DL in honing fraud detection models, particularly in addressing issues tied to imbalanced data and the ever-changing nature of fraud strategies, directly answering the second research question.

The comparison of machine learning and deep learning tools reveals that Random Forest achieves perfect accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Hyperparameter tuning enhances the performance of various models, emphasizing the importance of optimization. The choice of tools should consider a balance between accuracy and computational efficiency, with hyperparameter tuning as a key optimization strategy.

Data balancing techniques, such as SMOTE, play a critical role in improving the robustness and accuracy of fraud detection models. Trade-offs exist with each approach, and the choice depends on specific requirements.

Ensemble learning, combining multiple fraud detection methods, proves effective in real-world banking environments. Random Forest emerges as a top performer with perfect accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. The practical implications of implementing ensemble learning include improved overall model performance and resilience to diverse fraud scenarios.

In conclusion, the integration of advanced machine learning and deep learning techniques, coupled with strategic hyperparameter tuning, offers a promising avenue for enhancing credit card fraud detection. The findings emphasize the importance of adaptability, precision, and a holistic approach, particularly in addressing the dynamic landscape of financial fraud.

REFERENCES

Afriyie, J. K., Tawiah, K., Pels, W. A., Addai-Henne, S., Dwamena, H. A., Owiredu, E. O., Ayeh, S. A., & Eshun, J. (2023). A supervised machine learning algorithm for detecting and predicting fraud in credit card transactions. Decision Analytics Journal, 6, 100163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100163

Altaher, A., & Malebary, S. J. (2020). An intelligent approach to credit card fraud detection using an optimized light gradient boosting machine. IEEE Access, 8, 25579–25587. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2971354

Aman. (2021). Credit Card Fraud Detection using Machine Learning and Data Science. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 9(VII), 3788–3792. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.37200

Arya, A., Sehgal, M., Bhatia, N., Juneja, S., & Koundal, D. (2023). Heart disease prediction with machine learning and virtual reality. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 209–228). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-98381-5.00011-8

Assessing the feasibility of machine learning-based modelling and prediction of credit fraud outcomes using hyperparameter tuning. (2023). Advances in Computer, Signals and Systems, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.23977/acss.2023.070212

Awoyemi, J. O., Adetunmbi, A. O., & Oluwadare, S. A. (2017). Credit card fraud detection using machine learning techniques: A comparative analysis. 2017 International Conference on Computing Networking and Informatics (ICCNI). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccni.2017.8123782

Ayyadevara, V. K. (2018). Decision tree. In Apress eBooks (pp. 71–103). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3564-5_4

Bodepudi, H. (2021). Credit card fraud detection using unsupervised machine learning algorithms. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 69(8), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/ijctt-v69i8p101

Boutaher, N., Elomri, A., Abghour, N., Moussaid, K., & Rida, M. (2020). A Review of Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 8, ISSUE 10, OCTOBER 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/cloudtech49835.2020.9365916

Btoush, E. a. L. M., Zhou, X., Gururajan, R., Chan, K. C., Genrich, R., & Sankaran, P. (2023). A systematic review of literature on credit card cyber fraud detection using machine and deep learning. PeerJ, 9, e1278. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1278

Cherif, A., Badhib, A., Ammar, H., Alshehri, S., Kalkatawi, M., & Imine, A. (2023). Credit card fraud detection in the era of disruptive technologies: A systematic review. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 35(1), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.11.008

Cynthia, P. C., & George, S. T. (2020). An Outlier Detection Approach on Credit card Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Analysis on Supervised and Unsupervised learning. In Advances in intelligent systems and computing (pp. 125–135). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5285-4_12

Dalal, S., Seth, B., Rădulescu, M., Secară, C. G., & Tolea, C. (2022). Predicting Fraud in Financial Payment Services through Optimized Hyper-Parameter-Tuned XGBoost Model. Mathematics, 10(24), 4679. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10244679

Deep, A. (2021, December 15). Introduction to Deep Neural Networks with layers Architecture Step by Step with Real Time Use cases. Medium. https://medium.com/analytics-vidhya/introduction-to-deep-neural-networks-with-layers-architecture-step-by-step-with-real-time-use-cases-ef544580687b

Dornadula, V. N., & Geetha, S. (2019). Credit Card Fraud Detection using Machine Learning Algorithms. Procedia Computer Science, 165, 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.01.057

El-Naby, A. A., Hemdan, E. E., & Elsayed, A. M. (2022). An efficient fraud detection framework with credit card imbalanced data in financial services. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(3), 4139–4160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13434-6

Fiore, U., De Santis, A., Perla, F., Zanetti, P., & Palmieri, F. (2019). Using generative adversarial networks for improving classification effectiveness in credit card fraud detection. Information Sciences, 479, 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.12.030

Forough, J., & Momtazi, S. (2021). Ensemble of deep sequential models for credit card fraud detection. Applied Soft Computing, 99, 106883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106883

Ghaleb, F. A., Saeed, F., Al-Sarem, M., Qasem, S. N., & Al-Hadhrami, T. (2023). Ensemble Synthesized Minority Oversampling based Generative Adversarial Networks and Random Forest Algorithm for Credit Card Fraud Detection. IEEE Access, 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3306621

Gupta, P., Varshney, A., Khan, M. R., Ahmed, R., Shuaib, M., & Alam, S. (2023). Unbalanced Credit Card Fraud Detection Data: A Machine Learning-Oriented Comparative Study of Balancing Techniques. Procedia Computer Science, 218, 2575–2584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.231

Jain, R., Gour, B., & Dubey, S. (2016). A Hybrid Approach for Credit Card Fraud Detection using Rough Set and Decision Tree Technique. International Journal of Computer Applications, 139(10), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016909325

Jiang, S., Dong, R., Wang, J., & Xia, M. (2023). Credit card fraud detection based on unsupervised attentional anomaly Detection network. Systems, 11(6), 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11060305

Khan, S., Alourani, A., Mishra, B., Ashraf, A., & Kamal, M. (2022). Developing a Credit Card Fraud Detection Model using Machine Learning Approaches. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2022.0130350

Khatri, S., Arora, A., & Agrawal, A. P. (2020). Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Comparison. 2020 10th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence). https://doi.org/10.1109/confluence47617.2020.9057851

Kim, E., Lee, J., Shin, H., Yang, H., Cho, S., Nam, S., Song, Y., Yoon, J., & Kim, J. (2019). Champion-challenger analysis for credit card fraud detection: Hybrid ensemble and deep learning. Expert Systems With Applications, 128, 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.042

Kumar, A., & Dwivedi, R. K. (2020). Fraud Detection in Credit Card Data using Unsupervised Machine Learning Based Scheme. 2020 International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC). https://doi.org/10.1109/icesc48915.2020.9155615

Long Short-Term Memory Networks (LSTM)- simply explained! | Data Basecamp. (2022, June 4). Data Basecamp. https://databasecamp.de/en/ml/lstms Makki, S., Assaghir, Z., Taher, Y., Haque, R., Hacid, M., & Zeineddine, H. (2019). An experimental study with imbalanced classification approaches for credit card fraud detection. IEEE Access, 7, 93010–93022. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2927266

Mienye, I. D., & Sun, Y. (2023). A deep learning ensemble with data resampling for credit card fraud detection. IEEE Access, 11, 30628–30638. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3262020

Muhammad, I. Z., & Zhu, Y. (2015). SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES: a SURVEY. ICTACT Journal on Soft Computing, 05(03), 946–952. https://doi.org/10.21917/ijsc.2015.0133

Najadat, H., Altiti, O., Aqouleh, A. A., & Younes, M. (2020). Credit Card Fraud Detection Based on Machine and Deep Learning. 2020 11th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS). https://doi.org/10.1109/icics49469.2020.239524

Park, M., Jung, D., Lee, S., & Park, S. (2020). Heatwave damage prediction using random forest model in Korea. Applied Sciences, 10(22), 8237. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228237

Pavlidis, G. (2023). Deploying artificial intelligence for anti-money laundering and asset recovery: the dawn of a new era. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(7), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmlc-03-2023-0050

Prusti, D., Kumar, A., Purusottam, I. S., & Rath, S. K. (2021). A design methodology for web-based services to detect fraudulent transactions in credit card. ISEC 2021: 14th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference (Formerly Known as India Software Engineering Conference)February 2021Article No.: 14Pages 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452383.3452397

Quah, J. T., & Sriganesh, M. (2008). Real-time credit card fraud detection using computational intelligence. Expert Systems With Applications, 35(4), 1721–1732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.093

Ratan, P. (2023, November 6). What is the Convolutional Neural Network Architecture? Analytics Vidhya. https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2020/10/what-is-the-convolutional-neural-network-architecture/

Roy, A., Sun, J., Mahoney, R., Alonzi, L. P., Adams, S., & Beling, P. A. (2018). Deep learning detecting fraud in credit card transactions. 2018 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS). https://doi.org/10.1109/sieds.2018.8374722

Sailusha, R., Gnaneswar, V., Ramesh, R., & Rao, G. R. (2020). Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning. 2020 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS). https://doi.org/10.1109/iciccs48265.2020.9121114

Shah, D., & Sharma, L. K. (2023). Credit Card Fraud Detection using Decision Tree and Random Forest. ITM Web of Conferences, 53, 02012. https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20235302012

Shekhar, S., Leder-Luis, J., & Akoglu, L. (2022). Unsupervised machine learning for explainable health care fraud detection. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2211.02927

Singh, A., Ranjan, R. K., & Tiwari, A. (2021). Credit Card Fraud Detection under Extreme Imbalanced Data: A Comparative Study of Data-level Algorithms. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 34(4), 571–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813x.2021.1907795

Sohony, I., Pratap, R., & Nambiar, U. (2018). Ensemble learning for credit card fraud detection. CODS-COMAD ’18: Proceedings of the ACM India Joint International Conference on Data Science and Management of DataJanuary 2018Pages 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152494.3156815

Strelcenia, E., & Prakoonwit, S. (2023). A survey on GAN Techniques for data augmentation to address the imbalanced data issues in credit card fraud detection. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 5(1), 304–329. https://doi.org/10.3390/make5010019

Tayebi, M., & Kafhali, S. E. (2021). Hyperparameter optimization using genetic algorithms to detect frauds transactions. In Springer eBooks (pp. 288–297). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76346-6_27

Tayebi, M., & Kafhali, S. E. (2022). Performance analysis of metaheuristics based hyperparameters optimization for fraud transactions detection. Evolutionary Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-022-00764-5

The flowchart of the Adaboost algorithm. (n.d.). ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-flowchart-of-the-Adaboost-algorithm_fig3_352781421

Thennakoon, A., Bhagyani, C., Premadasa, S., Mihiranga, S., & Kuruwitaarachchi, N. (2019). Real-time Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning. 2019 9th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence). https://doi.org/10.1109/confluence.2019.8776942

Tran, P. T. M., Tran, K. P., Hương, T. T., Heuchenne, C., HienTran, P., & Le, T. M. H. (2018). Real Time Data-Driven Approaches for Credit Card Fraud Detection. ICEBA 2018: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on E-Business and ApplicationsFebruary 2018Pages 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3194188.3194196

Varmedja, D., Karanovic, M., Sladojević, S., Arsenović, M., & Anderla, A. (2019). Credit Card Fraud Detection - Machine Learning methods. 18th International Symposium INFOTEH-JAHORINA, 20-22 March 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/infoteh.2019.8717766

Zaffar, Z., Sohrab, F., Kanniainen, J., & Gabbouj, M. (2023). Credit Card Fraud Detection with Subspace Learning-based One-Class Classification. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2309.14880

Zhang, X., Han, Y., Xu, W., & Wang, Q. (2021). HOBA: A novel feature engineering methodology for credit card fraud detection with a deep learning architecture. Information Sciences, 557, 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.023

Key words:

-Credit card fraud detection

-Machine learning, deep learning

-Hyperparameter tuning

-K-Nearest Neighbors

-Data balancing techniques

-Ensemble learning

-Innovation

-Adaptability

-Cutting-edge algorithms