-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 291
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add new tag for enabled products / features to DSM checkpoints #8051
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6341a9b
Tag dsm checkpoints with product mask
kr-igor 3fc206e
Merge branch 'master' into kr-igor/dsm-product-tags
kr-igor ea77f9c
Fixed failing tests
kr-igor b934995
Merge branch 'master' into kr-igor/dsm-product-tags
kr-igor 6bb98df
Moved product mask logic from the config to DSM context
kr-igor 408bde4
Moved product mask to DSM payload level
kr-igor 0d0c395
Cleanup
kr-igor 36168c3
Fixed serialization
kr-igor d0c8837
Fixed tests
kr-igor 928343c
Merge branch 'master' into kr-igor/dsm-product-tags
kr-igor File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you think of putting that in the "hash of known tags"?
That means we need to update the hashOfKnownsTags every time we enable / disable data streams via remote configuration, but it would give a boost in performance.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That will add one more field to hash, so I'm not sure about performance gains (the check for enabled products just checks a few variables). Also changing the configuration will change pathway hashes if we hash using this tag. Not critical, but it will create duplicating pathways during the overlapping time period.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. Let's just not use it for hashing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you think about putting this mask as a new field on the message pack? It could be a top level field on the payload instead of being set on each checkpoint.
So we could call the config right before writing the message pack in the writer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea! Moved the logic