Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade yaml from 2.1.1 to 2.1.3 #173

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 9, 2023

Conversation

circleci-secops
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade yaml from 2.1.1 to 2.1.3.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 2 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 2 months ago, on 2022-10-05.
Release notes
Package name: yaml
  • 2.1.3 - 2022-10-05
    • Set correct node-end position for block collections with comments (#413)
  • 2.1.2 - 2022-10-02
    • Set correct node-end position for empty values with comments (#413)
  • 2.1.1 - 2022-05-29

    No changes in executable code, only TS types.

    • Revert "Use TS named tuple for range (#385)" -- see #393
    • Fix types for compatibility with TS 4.2 and 4.7
    • Add CI workflow for testing published type in a range of TS versions
from yaml GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: yaml
  • 8e7e57f 2.1.3
  • 8b0a3a4 fix: Set correct node-end position for block collections with comments (#413)
  • acb5f47 2.1.2
  • 6e7fba7 chore: Refresh lockfile
  • 4ac0f5d fix: Set correct node-end position for empty values with comments (#413)
  • e97948d ci: Uninstall @ jest/types before testing types on TS 4.0 and 3.8
  • 17a56bd chore: Update to jest 29
  • 26526d7 chore: Satisfy updated Typescript (4.8.2) & Prettier
  • c3c265b chore: Refresh lockfile
  • 57a29cd chore: Update docs-slate
  • 3197c60 docs: Use https in README.md link (#400)

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 96.16% // Head: 96.16% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (ed8bd1a) compared to base (00ddfb1).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #173   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.16%   96.16%           
=======================================
  Files          62       62           
  Lines         678      678           
  Branches       69       69           
=======================================
  Hits          652      652           
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials       15       15           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 17, 2022

👇 Click on the image for a new way to code review
  • Make big changes easier — review code in small groups of related files

  • Know where to start — see the whole change at a glance

  • Take a code tour — explore the change with an interactive tour

  • Make comments and review — all fully sync’ed with github

    Try it now!

Review these changes using an interactive CodeSee Map

Legend

CodeSee Map Legend

@KyleTryon KyleTryon self-requested a review February 9, 2023 17:05
@KyleTryon KyleTryon merged commit 318ee62 into main Feb 9, 2023
@KyleTryon KyleTryon deleted the snyk-upgrade-d9073a364a29d76da5de2089fe267983 branch February 9, 2023 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants