Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Fix for 2 vulnerabilities #45

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2023

Conversation

Abuchtela
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `pip` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • requirements/base.txt
⚠️ Warning
wiki 0.7.3 has requirement bleach<3.2,>=3.1.0, but you have bleach 6.0.0.
web3 4.5.0 has requirement websockets<6.0.0,>=5.0.1, but you have websockets 11.0.3.
web3 4.5.0 has requirement eth-account<0.4.0,>=0.2.1, but you have eth-account 0.5.9.
twilio 8.9.0 has requirement PyJWT<3.0.0,>=2.0.0, but you have PyJWT 1.5.3.
social-auth-core 4.4.2 has requirement PyJWT>=2.0.0, but you have PyJWT 1.5.3.
rlp 3.0.0 has requirement eth-utils<3,>=2.0.0, but you have eth-utils 1.4.1.
PyGithub 1.54 has requirement requests<2.25,>=2.14.0, but you have requests 2.31.0.
mkdocs 1.2.3 has requirement watchdog>=2.0, but you have watchdog 0.9.0.
google-auth 2.23.0 has requirement urllib3<2.0, but you have urllib3 2.0.5.
eth-testrpc 1.3.5 has requirement rlp<=0.6.0,>=0.4.7, but you have rlp 3.0.0.
eth-tester 0.9.1b1 has requirement eth-account>=0.6.0, but you have eth-account 0.5.9.
eth-tester 0.9.1b1 has requirement eth-abi>=3.0.1, but you have eth-abi 1.1.1.
eth-tester 0.9.1b1 has requirement eth-utils<3.0.0,>=2.0.0, but you have eth-utils 1.4.1.
eth-rlp 0.3.0 has requirement eth-utils<3,>=2.0.0, but you have eth-utils 1.4.1.
eth-keys 0.4.0 has requirement eth-utils<3.0.0,>=2.0.0, but you have eth-utils 1.4.1.
eth-keys 0.4.0 has requirement eth-typing<4,>=3.0.0, but you have eth-typing 2.3.0.
eth-account 0.5.9 has requirement eth-abi<3,>=2.0.0b7, but you have eth-abi 1.1.1.
eth-account 0.5.9 has requirement rlp<3,>=1.0.0, but you have rlp 3.0.0.
eth-account 0.5.9 has requirement eth-keys<0.4.0,>=0.3.4, but you have eth-keys 0.4.0.
elasticsearch 7.10.0 has requirement urllib3<2,>=1.21.1, but you have urllib3 2.0.5.
django-sekizai 3.0.1 has requirement django-classy-tags>=1, but you have django-classy-tags 0.8.0.
ccxt 4.0.104 has requirement cryptography>=2.6.1, but you have cryptography 2.3.
botocore 1.21.65 has requirement urllib3<1.27,>=1.25.4, but you have urllib3 2.0.5.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

By pinning:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Upgrade Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
critical severity 704/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 9.8
Arbitrary Code Execution
SNYK-PYTHON-PILLOW-2331901
pillow:
8.3.2 -> 9.0.0
No No Known Exploit
high severity 761/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 8.8
Remote Code Execution (RCE)
SNYK-PYTHON-REPORTLAB-5664897
reportlab:
3.5.55 -> 3.6.13
No Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Remote Code Execution (RCE)

@Abuchtela Abuchtela merged commit effd2c4 into master Sep 24, 2023
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants