Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cosmos SDK HTTP API returns error when querying for a transaction hash #3280

Open
fadeev opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Cosmos SDK HTTP API returns error when querying for a transaction hash #3280

fadeev opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@fadeev
Copy link
Member

fadeev commented Dec 12, 2024

Describe the Bug

https://zetachain.blockpi.network/lcd/v1/public/cosmos/tx/v1beta1/txs/6C86B759289ACB1BE2EEC35619B7F9227EC4AF4AC235BC70F366C1DCDF76539A

{"code":2, "message":"codespace sdk code 2: tx parse error: errUnknownField \"*types.MsgAddOutboundTracker\": {TagNum: 7, WireType:\"varint\"}", "details":[]}

Same with other RPC providers.

Interestingly enough, this tx exists in ZetaScan's indexer:

https://explorer.zetachain.com/cosmos/tx/6C86B759289ACB1BE2EEC35619B7F9227EC4AF4AC235BC70F366C1DCDF76539A

@fadeev fadeev added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 12, 2024
@lumtis
Copy link
Member

lumtis commented Dec 12, 2024

It shows up in other explorer as well https://zetachain.explorers.guru/transaction/6C86B759289ACB1BE2EEC35619B7F9227EC4AF4AC235BC70F366C1DCDF76539A

I think we already reached out to blockpi about this

@CharlieMc0
Copy link
Member

Just because it exists in an explorer doesn't mean this isn't an active bug in v23. It could have been indexed using v22 and retrieving the same TX does not work after v23.

@swift1337
Copy link
Contributor

swift1337 commented Dec 13, 2024

It's related to this PR (#3125); particularly this change in protos. reserved is placed validly, but seems there's an issue with decoding such messages

UPD: seems like we need to rollback reserved and keep legacy fields as deprecated. Will open a PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants