We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It's common good practice to include descriptive metadata with each ontology. It should include fields like:
If you agree to do #187, the metadata could be like this (in turtle):
@prefix uncefact: <https://vocabulary.uncefact.org/uncefact/>. uncefact: a owl:Ontology; rdfs:label "UNCEFACT Buy-Ship-Pay Reference Data Model"; rdfs:comment "some nice long description"; dct:source <https://unece.org/trade/uncefact/mainstandards>; rdfs:seeAlso <https://github.com/uncefact>, <https://vocabulary.uncefact.org/unlocode-vocab/>; dct:created "first publication date"^^xsd:date; dct:modified "last publication date, automatically updated"^^xsd:date.
And for UNLOCODE:
@prefix unlcdv: <https://vocabulary.uncefact.org/unlocode-vocab/>. unlcdv: a owl:Ontology; rdfs:label "UNLOCODE geographic gazetteer"; rdfs:comment "some nice long description"; dct:source <https://unece.org/trade/uncefact/unlocode>; rdfs:seeAlso <https://github.com/uncefact>, <https://vocabulary.uncefact.org/uncefact/>; dct:created "first publication date"^^xsd:date; dct:modified "last publication date, automatically updated"^^xsd:date.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
It's common good practice to include descriptive metadata with each ontology.
It should include fields like:
If you agree to do #187, the metadata could be like this (in turtle):
And for UNLOCODE:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: