Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UnboundLocalError: local variable 'wandb_logger' referenced before assignment #2562

Closed
wq9 opened this issue Mar 23, 2021 · 11 comments · Fixed by #2574
Closed

UnboundLocalError: local variable 'wandb_logger' referenced before assignment #2562

wq9 opened this issue Mar 23, 2021 · 11 comments · Fixed by #2574
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@wq9
Copy link
Contributor

wq9 commented Mar 23, 2021

🐛 Bug

Multi-GPU Training does not work with latest commit (e8fc97a Improved W&B integration)

To Reproduce (REQUIRED)

python -m torch.distributed.launch --nproc_per_node 4 train.py --data coco128.yaml --cfg yolov5s.yaml --weights '' --batch-size 16

Output:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "train.py", line 537, in <module>
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "train.py", line 537, in <module>
    train(hyp, opt, device, tb_writer)
  File "train.py", line 76, in train
    train(hyp, opt, device, tb_writer)
  File "train.py", line 76, in train
    loggers = {'wandb': wandb_logger.wandb}  # loggers dict
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'wandb_logger' referenced before assignment
    loggers = {'wandb': wandb_logger.wandb}  # loggers dict
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'wandb_logger' referenced before assignment
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "train.py", line 537, in <module>
    train(hyp, opt, device, tb_writer)
  File "train.py", line 76, in train
    loggers = {'wandb': wandb_logger.wandb}  # loggers dict
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'wandb_logger' referenced before assignment

Expected behavior

Normal Multi-GPU Training

Environment

N/A

Additional context

wandb_logger is not defined for child processes, so child processes terminates prematurely (e8fc97a#diff-ed183d67207df065a11e1289f19d34cc2abbc5448dea952683cfe9728c342b95R76)

@wq9 wq9 added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 23, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 23, 2021

👋 Hello @wq9, thank you for your interest in 🚀 YOLOv5! Please visit our ⭐️ Tutorials to get started, where you can find quickstart guides for simple tasks like Custom Data Training all the way to advanced concepts like Hyperparameter Evolution.

If this is a 🐛 Bug Report, please provide screenshots and minimum viable code to reproduce your issue, otherwise we can not help you.

If this is a custom training ❓ Question, please provide as much information as possible, including dataset images, training logs, screenshots, and a public link to online W&B logging if available.

For business inquiries or professional support requests please visit https://www.ultralytics.com or email Glenn Jocher at [email protected].

Requirements

Python 3.8 or later with all requirements.txt dependencies installed, including torch>=1.7. To install run:

$ pip install -r requirements.txt

Environments

YOLOv5 may be run in any of the following up-to-date verified environments (with all dependencies including CUDA/CUDNN, Python and PyTorch preinstalled):

Status

CI CPU testing

If this badge is green, all YOLOv5 GitHub Actions Continuous Integration (CI) tests are currently passing. CI tests verify correct operation of YOLOv5 training (train.py), testing (test.py), inference (detect.py) and export (export.py) on MacOS, Windows, and Ubuntu every 24 hours and on every commit.

@glenn-jocher
Copy link
Member

@wq9 thank you for the bug report!

@AyushExel do you think there's a quick fix for this (i.e. next few hours)? If not we should probably revert #2125 until we have a chance to debug further.

@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher added the TODO High priority items label Mar 23, 2021
@AyushExel
Copy link
Contributor

AyushExel commented Mar 23, 2021

@glenn-jocher Yes I'm looking into this now. Any idea what's the difference in execution in multi-GPU case?

@AyushExel
Copy link
Contributor

@glenn-jocher Okay I think I found the solution. Testing it in a bit. I'll let you know

@glenn-jocher
Copy link
Member

@AyushExel I'm not sure what it could be. Multi-GPU is always tricky. Rank 0 and -1 processes are intended for the main process/GPU, while all other parts of the code will run on all processes.

Do you have access to a Multi-GPU instance to test on?

@AyushExel
Copy link
Contributor

@glenn-jocher Yes, I'm testing on multi-GPUS. I usually work on single GPU so this test didn't cross my mind. In the previous integration, wandb logging worked only with the single GPU case right? Juding by the previous integration, here:

if rank in [-1, 0] and wandb and wandb.run is None:

@glenn-jocher
Copy link
Member

glenn-jocher commented Mar 23, 2021

@AyushExel oh, no, master before PR performed W&B logging with Multi-GPU well, i.e.:
Screenshot 2021-03-23 at 15 25 45

See Multi-GPU Tutorial for DP and DDP commands (we need to test both). DDP is strongly preferred though due to it's better performance.

@AyushExel
Copy link
Contributor

@glenn-jocher thanks for the info. I'm working on a fix.

@AyushExel
Copy link
Contributor

@glenn-jocher Okay this is fixed. I'm testing in a different environment without wandb installed. Expect a PR in a few minutes

@AyushExel AyushExel mentioned this issue Mar 23, 2021
@AyushExel
Copy link
Contributor

@glenn-jocher I've tested on my end and the fix seems to work in all cases. CI tests are running on the PR now. Hopefully, I haven't introduced any CI typos.
Sorry about this bug though. I'll include DDP in my test cases.

@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher linked a pull request Mar 23, 2021 that will close this issue
@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher removed the TODO High priority items label Mar 23, 2021
@glenn-jocher
Copy link
Member

@wq9 thanks for identifying this problem! We've pushed a fix for this now in PR #2574, and made sure to test Multi-GPU training as well as resuming Multi-GPU training. Please git pull or clone again to receive this update, and let us know if you have any further problems!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants