-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 401
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test vector transport and its inverse with dIntegrateTransport
#2273
Merged
jcarpent
merged 7 commits into
stack-of-tasks:devel
from
fabinsch:add-py-unittest-transport
Jun 6, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
306de26
py/test: use `dIntegrateTransport` to transport vector back and forth
fabinsch d8bfd40
update CHANGELOG
fabinsch f53cfb0
py/test: use `dIntegrateTransport` to transport matrix back and forth
fabinsch e28ed37
cpp/test: use `dIntegrateTransport` to transport vector/matrix back a…
fabinsch f2db9df
update CHANGELOG
fabinsch 8470fe6
rename vars in unittest dIntegrateTransport
fabinsch 5eb8be3
changelog: clean
jcarpent File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't this be
dIntegrateTransport(qb, v_r, tvec_at_qa, ...)
?Since we check that$v_r$ from $qa_r$ , where we will end... Somewhere else than $q_a$ or $q_b$ 😅
qa
is equal toqa_r
below, this line amounts to integratingMeanwhile this line would fully make sense to me if we start from$q_b$ : then $q_b \oplus v_r$ would land on $q_{ar} = q_a$ , where we take $q_b$ , which is why we have the equality between $q_b$ , not $q_{ar}$ ! 😛)
tvec_at_qa
, and transport it back totvec_at_qb
andtvec_at_qa_r
below. (But then,tvec_at_qa_r
lies in the tangent space at@fabinsch I understand the test passed so I must have missed something. If you can double check at some point that would be 👌
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Meanwhile I fully agree with the Python variant.