We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dear developers,
I'm trying to use ColabDesign AF to design a sequence using the fixbb protocol fixing sites with a list of positions as follows:
fixbb
model = mk_afdesign_model(protocol="fixbb") model.prep_inputs(pdb_filename="mystruc.pdb", chain="A",fix_pos="10,14,22,31,46,48,56,58,60,77,79,81,131,133,141,143,145,153,155,157,164,166,168") model.restart() model.design_3stage() seq=SeqRecord(Seq(model.get_seqs()[0]),id=f"design{i}",description="") model.save_pdb(f"fixed/org/design{i}.{model.protocol}.pdb")
I've assumed the positions need to 0-based. Is that correct?
I must be doing something wrong as the resulting sequence differs from the input pdb protein sequence in the sites given to fix_pos?
fix_pos
Any hint would be greatly appreciated.
Best, Daniel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The fix_pos uses PDB numbering (so that would be 1-index for most PDBs)
Sorry, something went wrong.
@sokrypton, thank you for clearing this up.
So if I use 1-based cords the above code should always result in sequence designs that are identical to the Input pdb seq sites given via fix_pos?
Or are there situations the algorithm/model will change the site anyway?
No branches or pull requests
Dear developers,
I'm trying to use ColabDesign AF to design a sequence using the
fixbb
protocol fixing sites with a list of positions as follows:I've assumed the positions need to 0-based. Is that correct?
I must be doing something wrong as the resulting sequence differs from the input pdb protein sequence in the sites given to
fix_pos
?Any hint would be greatly appreciated.
Best,
Daniel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: