-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 227
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
benchmark result to compare with other crates #352
Comments
It's true that I took a quick look at the benchmark and I would not call it a fair comparison - the author compared However, the folks from We know that there are some areas to improve the performance of The required improvements are known to us and we've discussed them in the past:
I'm confident that after addressing these points the gap in performance between The essence of the aforementioned problems:
Ideally, we would need to refactor it into a sans I/O implementation of WebSockets and use it from |
In reddit discussion of new websocket crates, mentioned benchmarks results for websockets crates:
code for benchmark here. It is just send/receive. May be somebody would be interesting to improve not the best results for "tungstenite".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: