Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handling transient network filesystem issues #386

Closed
tazjin opened this issue Oct 1, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Handling transient network filesystem issues #386

tazjin opened this issue Oct 1, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@tazjin
Copy link

tazjin commented Oct 1, 2023

gonic version: v0.15.2


Hey! Thanks for making gonic, it's pretty great! I've started reorganising my music library recently (after the Bandcamp announcement ...), and gonic really hits the spot for what I want.

My setup is a bit odd: I have my music library (O(1000s) of tracks) in an S3-compatible storage bucket, which is mounted on my machines through geesefs. With disk caching etc. this works pretty well, even with large FLAC files.

I've seen one issue though which is a bit tricky to reproduce: In case of transient network issues, or problems with geesefs, IO errors will be returned to gonic during scans. I've gotten the impression that sometimes this is treated akin to a file deletion, i.e. the track(s) are removed from the library, and reappear later when the IO issues are fixed (with different IDs, probably).

I'm not sure what the intended behaviour here is, but I think I'd prefer if IO errors were always treated as transient and didn't lead to file removal.

I plan to debug this further (it's possible that it only happens during full scans, I'm not sure yet), just wanted to leave an issue here in case anyone has run into something like this and investigated already.

@sentriz
Copy link
Owner

sentriz commented Sep 18, 2024

closing in favour of #538

@sentriz sentriz closed this as completed Sep 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants