Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Poetry versioning should auto fallback to pep440 if no valid semver #8744

Closed
viceice opened this issue Feb 18, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Poetry versioning should auto fallback to pep440 if no valid semver #8744

viceice opened this issue Feb 18, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@viceice
Copy link
Member

viceice commented Feb 18, 2021

What would you like Renovate to be able to do?

Renovate poetry versioning should automatically fallback to pep440 versioning if the current version isn't a semver compatible version.

Did you already have any implementation ideas?

No, it's a little complicated for ranges. eg project lupa = "^1.8" and lock file version = "1.9" so:

  • it's not pep440 because of caret
  • it's not semver because of short version

ref: #8740, #8742

@viceice viceice added priority-3-medium Default priority, "should be done" but isn't prioritised ahead of others status:requirements Full requirements are not yet known, so implementation should not be started type:feature Feature (new functionality) versioning:poetry Poetry versioning scheme labels Feb 18, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been labeled with status:requirements. This indicates that we don't know enough to start work and further requirements or a reproduction are needed first.

This label will be replaced with status:ready once all requirements and reproductions necessary to start work have been met.

If it's not clear what is missing to move this issue forward, ask for clarification in a new comment. If you think we already have what we need to move forward, mention this in a new comment.

@rarkins rarkins removed type:feature Feature (new functionality) priority-3-medium Default priority, "should be done" but isn't prioritised ahead of others status:requirements Full requirements are not yet known, so implementation should not be started versioning:poetry Poetry versioning scheme labels Oct 1, 2023
@renovatebot renovatebot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 1, 2023
@rarkins rarkins converted this issue into discussion #24746 Oct 1, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants