-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I would appreciate a less verbose build option #772
Comments
If you are using setuptools as backend, you can try: python -m build -C--quiet To reduce de verbosity (it will not reduce to 1 line though). |
Build does not interfere with the build backend's output. That's why build backends like scikit-build-core produce colorful output with build, and not with pip (which captures and reprints the output). Build backends generally have verbosity toggles. Setuptools is the only one that is extremely verbose by default. That said, it might not be a bad idea, I'm +0.1 on it. You can do |
I'd like some way to communicate to tools what the built distributions were, but that's tricky to do since stdout/stderr are being written to by the build backend. |
This is #198 - let's discuss it there. |
Hello everyone,
The default
python -m build
lists a lot of interactions with files that I don't want to see (600 lines). I really only want to know if the build succeeded or not.
can I have a
python -m build --quiet
or something that just tells me
Successfully built foobar.whl
? I can just pipe it to a file but that doesn't tell me success y/n.Thank you for your work and this software!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: